Difference being RichardChill openly and flagrantly used/uses terrorist imagery on PRESIDENTS, so he kind of opened the door to the “terrorist” accusation didn’t he? Making reference to those posts complies with the mudslinging rule and everything. Are we really gonna say Richard can post IRA imagery and not at least be called out for it?
[Incidentally, I think everyone with more than two brain cells realizes that calling Richard a terrorist in response is done in a roleplay sense, just as he claimed his use of IRA imagery was merely “roleplay”]
Tl;dr — Richard deliberately and provocatively branded himself as a roleplay terrorist and got a roleplay punishment in return. Anything wrong with that?