in no way do i support the ban of anyone here who hasn't broken tos

Yeah, there should be a better reason other then "being mean."

There was but our trial was blocked. Envoy is obstructing Congress once again and making it impossible for us to get anything done, just like he did during the impeachment. He and Surly are desperate to defend Richard so they started nitpicking and stopped the whole process. I tried to do what they asked anyway but it still wasn't enough for them. Envoy will tell me to try again and then after all that he'll just block me from trying again.

Well just a s k

Remember last time? I asked and Envoy declined because he somehow concluded there wasn't enough evidence even after I posted this: https://imgflip.com/i/5gghl2#com13056032

He told me to repeat the impeachment all over again knowing full well he would refuse to continue the process no matter what because he's been suspiciously consistently pro-Richard and intentionally wasted my time, most likely to get a reaction out of me in an attempt to discredit me.

hmmm

Well that's alot of evidence. Envoy should have to ban him for that

ikr

Ye

why don't you use that then, instead of doctored evidence? just a thought.

imgflip.com/i/5gghl2#com13056032

Posted by IG right above.

that was the impeachment, this is the banning trial.

for another trial, a real one

yeah, not counting doctored evidence is "nitpicking"

It is when the evidence you're calling doctored wasn't considered doctored by the actual judge at the trial. You're interfering with democracy and the law, and the President agrees.

https://imgflip.com/i/5hbax9

What are they trying to ban you we had a trial for the assassination if it's because of being a jerk there is no point so you do have a point