Imgflip Logo Icon

I respect SurlyKong in many ways, but I can't say I understand his logic here.

I respect SurlyKong in many ways, but I can't say I understand his logic here. | SURLYKONG WHEN CONGRESS DEMOCRATICALLY VOTES TO BAN A TERRORIST TROLL 99% OF THE STREAM OPPOSES; SURLYKONG WHEN ONE UNELECTED MOD DEFENDS THE TERRORIST TROLL AND OVERRULES THE WILL OF CONGRESS; UNCONSTITUTIONAL DICTATORSHIP! LITERALLY NORTH KOREA! | image tagged in hypocrisy,memes,politics,double standards,congress | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
196 views 5 upvotes Made by anonymous 3 years ago in IMGFLIP_PRESIDENTS
Lily Lu memeCaption this Meme
62 Comments
4 ups, 3y,
1 reply
I'll explain the law to you again if I must, but we'd all be having a much better time if you could simply learn constitutional meme law and US common law for yourself...
[deleted]
1 up, 3y,
1 reply
I read the IP constitution (I even drafted one version myself once), and I’m not even American so why should I care about your laws?
4 ups, 3y,
1 reply
The stream is run off the meme constitution and us common law. I know. I know. You didn't know that.
Settle down there. I'll explain the law to you in a few minutes once I get the memes made. I'm not wasting my time in the comments.
[deleted]
1 up, 3y,
1 reply
No thank you.
3 ups, 3y,
1 reply
Then don't make memes calling me out...
Never get into a constitutional law contest with a constitutional lawyer...
[deleted]
2 ups, 3y,
1 reply
Not long ago you were lecturing me on freedom of speech. Now you're telling me what I can and cannot post? I have every right to call you out. Who made you some sort of all-powerful "constitutional lawyer" immune to criticism? If my meme offends you then too bad. You waved off Richard's threats and terrorism as "dark humour" but now you have a problem with this? My meme pointed out your double standard, and now you've only gone and acted even more hypocritical.
3 ups, 3y
Then feel free to continue.
Literally nothing offends me.
But if you MAKE attack adds, well you can figure it out...
I explained how the law worked in my memes. Rather than try to understand the law, you accused me of hypocrisy. I explained constitutional law AGAIN last night. Again rather than try to understand the law you accuse me of hypocrisy again.
I would assume you were just dense, but I know the real reason you didn't read my memes explaining the law is because you have no defense except "I am the law!"
3 ups, 3y,
1 reply
im not defending him, but this is the second time yall neglected the process by which we do things. if you wanna do it, do it right, don't complain to me when u screw up and blame me.
[deleted]
1 up, 3y,
2 replies
This is the second time you have said "if you wanna do it, do it right". I remember when you told me to repeat the entire impeachment process of a minor, petty issue you had with it that you didn't point out until the last second after Congress had already finished voting. You forced me to start all over again knowing that you would refuse to let the process continue no matter what evidence I offered like this: https://imgflip.com/i/5gghl2#com13056032

That's why I was forced to pass an amendment. If you don't let me repeat the impeachment I will have no choice but to do that again because you simply abuse your power too much.
3 ups, 3y,
1 reply
you cant change the law every time it doesn't give you what you want. and you say I abuse my power smh.
[deleted]
1 up, 3y,
1 reply
And that's why you should stop changing the law every time it doesn't give you what you want.

And yes I do indeed say you abuse your power. Because you do.
3 ups, 3y,
1 reply
never, ever, changed the law. you did.
[deleted]
1 up, 3y,
1 reply
never, ever, changed the law. you did.
3 ups, 3y,
1 reply
you literally just said you made an amendment to the law, you good?
[deleted]
1 up, 3y
You literally just said you aren't letting Congress doing it's job, you good?
3 ups, 3y,
1 reply
and what is the amendment gonna be? there are problems with the evidence provided , so are you gonna make an amendment saying the judge doesn't get to look a the evidence? 🤦‍♂️
[deleted]
1 up, 3y,
1 reply
Um...no not doing that lol but keep fantasising.
2 ups, 3y,
1 reply
so then what is the amendment?
[deleted]
1 up, 3y,
1 reply
lol never even said anything about an amendment you good?
3 ups, 3y,
1 reply
[deleted]
1 up, 3y
Well that depends on whether you let me do that again. Didn't even say what the amendment would entail. I probably won't even pass one anyway because I'm not as desperate to ban Richard as I was to impeach him. I might need to just let the bad guys win this time unfortunately.
[deleted]
3 ups, 3y,
2 replies
same wit yo double standards

"i luve free speahce!

to

"he a bad naugyty boyy! we ban him forever! this is ademocracky!
2 ups, 3y,
1 reply
Envoy says we do the trial illegally and you are the clown we are trying to ban? Envoy should just ban Richard himself but he doesn’t have the common sense to do it.
[deleted]
2 ups, 3y,
2 replies
baby rage
2 ups, 3y,
2 replies
To think Envoy is still supporting you is crazy and mental. He doesn’t even want you banned. Sort your mind out, Richard.
2 ups, 3y,
1 reply
bruh.

I never supported Richard in the sense you're saying I just supported the proper system...?
2 ups, 3y,
1 reply
Ok, maybe you didn’t support Richard but you once didn’t support his impeachment, I think. Also, tell us the correct system for the system because our trial was “voided” because it was “illegal”. I trust Surly’s word but, you know what, screw this. I have other matters to attend to.
1 up, 3y,
1 reply
2 ups, 3y,
2 replies
I read that and I think one of them is screenshot and photoshop edited. The one I don’t trust is idk but I’d probably say… idk. Richard’s looks convincing to not be true but I don’t think CotW photoshopped that evidence. I’ll have to look at the evidence again. Although, Surly accusing CotW is bizarre as Uno admitted CotW is his brother.
2 ups, 3y,
3 replies
from a screenshot, cotw released it is both from 2 months and 2 days ago. now way its real.
1 up, 3y,
2 replies
Maybe just trying to get Richard banned from the stream (trust me, 69% of the stream wants him banned, maybe even more) because he is too immature, threatened IG with an Irish terrorist group and keeps spamming baby rage with emojis but yet IG was banned for longer? I get denouncing streams and saying Nazis have changed is bad but threatening the same guy who said that with a terrorist group that hates his country is even worse but yet Richard has been banned for a shorter time period than IG. What?
2 ups, 3y
ig was never banned. besides, just because people dislike him doesn't mean he gets banne.d
[deleted]
1 up, 3y
I'm starting to give up trying to reason with Envoy. It seems impossible.
0 ups, 3y,
1 reply
Reply to Last Comment: Well he wasn’t banned, just suspended for 5 days but he was missing in that time period, so I guess it counts as a ‘ban’ but Richy was only banned for 2 days.
2 ups, 3y
it doesn't, that was his choice, this isn't Richards's choice.
[deleted]
1 up, 3y,
1 reply
Judge certainly didn't see it that way. But you only care about trials when you agree with the ruling.
2 ups, 3y
i guarantee you if the judge knew it was doctored his ruling would be very different.
0 ups, 3y
The meme chats are fake how do you not see it
[deleted]
2 ups, 3y,
1 reply
baby rage
1 up, 3y,
1 reply
Is that all your spamming?
[deleted]
2 ups, 3y,
1 reply
maybe
1 up, 3y,
1 reply
Sort your mind out if you ever want 0.1% chance of getting back into Congress.
[deleted]
2 ups, 3y,
1 reply
baby rage
2 ups, 3y,
2 replies
Spammed again, can you stop spamming, you clown?
[deleted]
2 ups, 3y
Spam is an offence. Don't worry, I won't be forgetting this.
[deleted]
2 ups, 3y
if u ask nicely
[deleted]
2 ups, 3y,
1 reply
Spammed "baby rage" four times? Now you've committed another ban-worthy offence. It ain't over just yet, emoji boy.
[deleted]
1 up, 3y,
1 reply
now im starting to think that you have a grudge against me....
[deleted]
2 ups, 3y
I take action whenever someone commits an offence. I don't let bias influence my decisions, unlike Envoy...
[deleted]
2 ups, 3y,
1 reply
Ah yes, intentionally misspelling words when trying to quote stuff I never said.
[deleted]
3 ups, 3y,
1 reply
so you don't love free speache?

and i aint a naughty boy?
[deleted]
1 up, 3y,
1 reply
I was talking about the whole ""he a bad naugyty boyy! we ban him forever! this is ademocracky!" think but ok keep fantasising.
[deleted]
2 ups, 3y,
1 reply
so i no naught boy?

thx bro
[deleted]
1 up, 3y,
1 reply
"As you can see, the wild Richard has moved on to his backup defence of intentionally misinterpreting everything his opponent says after his previous tactic failed. Truly a fascinating creature."
[deleted]
2 ups, 3y,
1 reply
baby rage
[deleted]
1 up, 3y,
1 reply
Yes, you are indeed raging like a baby.
[deleted]
2 ups, 3y,
3 replies
"As you can see, the wild bri''ish has moved on to his backup defence of intentionally misinterpreting everything his opponent says after his previous tactic failed. Truly a fascinating creature."
[deleted]
1 up, 3y
I don't see a terrorist in my photo. Just an actor dressed up in non-terrorist clothes.
[deleted]
1 up, 3y,
2 replies
[deleted]
2 ups, 3y
and yet you cry when shown pictures of an irish in a ski mask
[deleted]
2 ups, 3y
...ever hear of the Zulu people? or India?
[deleted]
0 ups, 3y
Are you Zulu or Indian? Doubt it.
Lily Lu memeCaption this Meme
Created with the Imgflip Meme Generator
IMAGE DESCRIPTION:
SURLYKONG WHEN CONGRESS DEMOCRATICALLY VOTES TO BAN A TERRORIST TROLL 99% OF THE STREAM OPPOSES; SURLYKONG WHEN ONE UNELECTED MOD DEFENDS THE TERRORIST TROLL AND OVERRULES THE WILL OF CONGRESS; UNCONSTITUTIONAL DICTATORSHIP! LITERALLY NORTH KOREA!