Since Surly is demanding a retrial for some reason, this is just a vote for everything else Richard has done.

Yes.

Yea

Yes.

Yes

I vote a week

Yes

yes

Yea

yes

Yes

That makes 8.

Who is that

Thanos.

No the person who voted

Lib_Terds_Suck.

Who is that what did he/she do to get into Congress I don't see any images from him/she on the stream

I selected him after RichardChill24 was impeached to fill his vacant seat.

I have not seen the person on the stream before also aren't you not allowed to put people in Congress that are not on the stream

No that is not a rule.

Oh it's not a rule I see well now I have an idea for the campaing

Here Here

https://imgflip.com/memechat?invite=RUCiEJoHHIpjHNSDNzyPI-LHazOESk-N

Banning people for being a-holes is tempting but is overall an overstep of gov. power, and the assassinations were legal at the time he did them. Nay

pretty sure you can't hold a trial for things i've already been charged on 🤔🤔🤔

This is illegal. You cannot convict someone retroactively. The law banning hits was enacted AFTER alt of the west tried to wack you. You're making a mockery of the constitution.

I'll take that as a "nay" vote.

There is no vote.
Because their was no constitutional trial.
Now if you wanna ban him for being a jackass instead of some unconstitutional trail, then I'll vote.

This ban isn't JUST for the trial you think is "unconstitutional" for some reason. We just needed the trial to finish before we could vote, and the trial was about the assassination and now it's over so Congress can vote.

Read the constitution.
You cannot try someone based on retroactively applied law.
No trail. No vote.
Unless you wanna make a new meme explaining that this vote is just because Richard is an asshole and deserves to be banned for being an asshole this is illegal.
No trail. No vote.

I have read the constitution?

What do you mean "trail"? And why do you keep repeating everything?

Fine, since you're just going to keep nagging I've edited the meme title.

Everything Richard has done?
No.
"Banning Richard for being an asshole"
Yes.
You can't prove he did anything, which is why I had the trail thrown out.
Do this legally or don't do it. How hard is this? Everyone on the stream hates Richard's bullshit. So ban him for being a troll, don't try to ban him on some trumped up charges.
Sorted.

I did what you demanded. Already sorted.