Fair enough, however its a mess not having a head owner. I get that head owner seems to get too much power, so we can work that out. But I still think its necessary to have one.
[deleted] M
0 ups, 4y,
2 replies
We should all just work together to control stream.
[deleted] M
0 ups, 4y
Yeah that sounds good.
[deleted] M
0 ups, 4y
True...
[deleted] M
0 ups, 4y,
1 reply
Why does it matter if there is a head owner? It's just a title of Nothing More.
[deleted] M
0 ups, 4y,
1 reply
then why has that title been able to put so much stress on past head owners that they quit after a few days?
[deleted] M
0 ups, 4y,
1 reply
Because when someone hears the word head owner, They think that that person has the most power with they actually don't.
[deleted] M
0 ups, 4y,
2 replies
Well they have most of the same powers as other owners, the only difference is they get slightly more say in decisions and what happens.
[deleted] M
1 up, 4y
Not really actually. When I was the main owner I didn't have all of the power say. The owners have to vote in order to make a major decision.
[deleted] M
0 ups, 4y
So I see your point on why it isn't necessary to have one
IN MY OPINION I DON'T THINK THERE SHOULD BE A HEAD OWNER. THINK YOU SHOULD JUST BE MULTIPLE OWNERS TO TAKE CONTROL STREAM. HEAD OWNERS ONLY REPRESENT THE STREAM. THINK THAT THE ORIGINAL OWNER OF THE STREAM SHOULD JUST REPRESENT US IN GENERAL.
Caption this Meme
