Here is my argument as to why IG is guilty.

170 views • Made by Omega_Void 3 years ago in Courtroom

32 Comments

Lardar
1 up, 3y, 1 reply
I'm ready to defend IG in court right now.
Omega_Void
0 ups, 3y
Okay.They sent you a link.
Wubbzymon
1 up, 3y, 2 replies
It wasn't really an attack ad, more of "heads up they support blank"
Omega_Void
0 ups, 3y
An attack add is any add done to convince people not to vote for an opponent.
Omega_Void
0 ups, 3y, 1 reply
Also EYM doesn't support violence.
[deleted] M
0 ups, 3y, 1 reply
I can confirm
Omega_Void
0 ups, 3y, 1 reply
What can you confirm?
[deleted] M
0 ups, 3y
That the EYM does not support violence. I'm Vice president of the Epic Yeeter Memers
[deleted]
1 up, 3y, 1 reply
EYM Is officially tied to the IP stream as they are an official party of IP. Jeffy Even said so.

Omega (Faliure51) Kept attacking richard baselessly, within the mudslinging rules. MorallyRighteous isn't apart of IP.
Omega_Void
0 ups, 3y, 1 reply
RichardChill24's personal opinions were decided to not be fair game for attack adds. Therefore EYM members' personal opinions are not fair game for attack adds.
[deleted]
1 up, 3y, 1 reply
https://imgflip.com/i/55yauc



You used this ad to justify your claim. MorallyRighteous has no ties to IP whatsoever. If they did promote it inside of IP (Or related streams like Delta_Force, Imgflip_Congress, The_New_Congress, Courtroom) then the ads inside those streams are duly justified for attack ads.
Omega_Void
0 ups, 3y, 1 reply
IG used nothing to justify his false claim and EYM members' personal opinions on BLM are part of politics/real_politics/politics_too/[insert politics stream here]. None of the streams I just listed have ties to IP either.
Wubbzymon
1 up, 3y, 1 reply
Give the context that fits what he is saying
Omega_Void
0 ups, 3y, 1 reply
I don't quite understand that comment. Can you please phrase it differently? Thanks.
Wubbzymon
1 up, 3y, 1 reply
He is talking about MorrallyRighteous and you are looping around it and talking about EYM despite Captain already explaining it to ya
Omega_Void
0 ups, 3y, 2 replies
MorrallyRighteous isn't the issue. The issue is that it was decided RichardChill24 could have personal opinions outside of this stream yet according to the RUP EYM members' can't have personal opinions that remain outside of the stream for the purposes of attack adds.
Wubbzymon
1 up, 3y
o_o
[deleted]
1 up, 3y, 1 reply
But you did attack the RUP on his personal opinions.
Omega_Void
0 ups, 3y, 2 replies
I said IG was a bigot based on information in the IP stream.
[deleted]
1 up, 3y
I'm not denying that. But you attacked him on something else.
Omega_Void
0 ups, 3y
I also pointed out that broke the mudslinging rules.
Jeffy12334akRIPM
0 ups, 3y, 1 reply
can i see the link to the attack add
Omega_Void
0 ups, 3y, 1 reply
imgflip.com/i/5cxw3a
Jeffy12334akRIPM
0 ups, 3y
S*** that one, yeh i have seen
[deleted]
0 ups, 3y, 2 replies
I am voting for him to go to jail
[deleted]
1 up, 3y, 1 reply
Uh are you voting guilty or are you voting in the wrong spot
[deleted]
0 ups, 3y, 1 reply
Guilty
123gamer101-officalM
0 ups, 3y, 1 reply
Alright calm down we still need to hear ladar statement
[deleted]
0 ups, 3y
Ok
Omega_Void
1 up, 3y, 1 reply
You don't get to vote.
[deleted]
1 up, 3y, 1 reply
Said who? he's apart of 'le jury'
Omega_Void
0 ups, 3y
Nevermind I made a mistake.

Show More Comments

Caption this Meme

Created with the Imgflip Meme Generator

IMAGE DESCRIPTION:

YOUR HONOR IG IS CLEARLY GUILTY. HERE ARE THE FACTS: IG MADE AN ATTACK ADD. THE ADD WAS BASED ON A CANDIDATE'S PERSONAL OPINIONS. FAILURE51 VS RICHARDCHILL24 ESTABLISHED THAT A CANDIDATE'S PERSONAL OPINIONS ARE NOT RELATED TO THE STREAM FOR THE PURPOSE OF ATTACK ADDS. THE MUDSLINGING RULE SAYS THAT ATTACK ADDS MUST BE BASED IN THE IP STREAM. THEREFORE IG BROKE THE MUDSLINGING RULES