Trump winning everything

What a crock of shit…do you write news stories for CNN

Mad because is not your typical right wing media machine trash?

what?

At least 15 of those things aren't true.

Yea.
It claims only 120k Americans died of trumpvirus.
More like 600k.
LIE!

if you blame the virus on trump even though he tried to tell everybody the source you're pathetic just like flip flop fauci, she-bat pelosi, kamala chuckles and sippy cup joe no wonder you're democrat.

Who cares where it came from. It is about how to deal with it.

Are you actually serious? Do you actually stand by that statement? I will give you some time. Think about it, research it and let me know where you stand on this.

I do.
What about you doing some research and prove me wrong.
Trump worshiping right wing media machine crap not allowed.

Pay attention, my comment was to DanielLewellan, the mouth breathing right wing psychophant.

Psychophant? I don't think you know what that word means

Paradoxically, if you can’t be proven wrong, you also can’t be proven right. Logic is hard.

Well, you can prove it one way or another. These are facts, not opinions. These can be researched and argued, if you find facts that dispute the statements. These statements can easily be verified, with some time spent. I am guessing it will take about the same amount of time it took to research the facts to begin with.

But, go ahead and throw your hands up, point fingers and scream LIES.

"Trumpvirus"? 600k dead... because of Trump? You can't prove Trump didn't kill 600K the same way you can't prove God doesn't exist. It's just another faith-based narrative.

So that is your research? Good job. I can come up with a total of 100k every two months between September and December of last year, using public data.

Oh that's right, that data is skewed, and not correct because the "man" is fudging numbers.

I dont have to have the existence of God proven to me, that is what Faith does. I truly beleive had a single narrative been put forth, the count could have been several mitigated, by a solid Plan.

I wonder who's job it was to put together a solid plan?

You’re giving Trump too much credit. You can’t factually tie Trump to COVID deaths in the same way that you can’t tie the director of the FAA for aviation deaths. It’s a stupid narrative for stupid people.

I understand that. But it is his plan, his administration. If the FAA had 5 plane crashes in a week, and the FAA director did nothing, made no changes, he would be FIRED. IT IS HIS ADMINISTRATION.

That's my point - you have to prove that Trumps inaction led to more deaths than would have happened had he made "changes". There's no solid data to support the claim, not to mention the vagueness of it makes it indefensible. What should he have done? Why? How does that action correlate to less deaths?

It's all conjecture my friend. In order to argue this, you'd have to know every single factor that contributed to the spread (Trump and not-Trump factors) and to what extent they contributed, then weigh them against each other to see which factors contributed the largest. This is indefensible.

Another way to look at it would be to look at other countries response and deaths (the best way to look at it) but there are outliers on either end of the spectrum. They do not provide any concrete answers, either.

If you're going to accuse someone of murdering over half a million people, you better back it up with something more than what you've done so far.

I sir did not make the claim of 600k. I only showed the previous poster how those COULD BE ACHEIVED based on a three month sample from last year. That is all.

Just to throw hands up and call lies, is childish. That is all I was proving.

The last president who didnt release his taxes was Gerald Ford, 40 years not 45. Plus Trump said he will release them once his IRS audit is completed.
President Trump did not "allow" people to die. That's slander. Plus if anyone is to blame, it would be the Democrats' shining star Fauci.
The presidential elections of 1876, 1888, 2000, and 2016 produced an Electoral College winner who did not receive the most votes in the general election. Additionally, in 14 other presidential elections (1844, 1848, 1856, 1860, 1880, 1884, 1892, 1912, 1916, 1948, 1960, 1968, 1992, and 1996), the winner received a plurality but not a majority of the total popular votes cast. Additionally, there are nominees who lost the popular vote many times over, they just never made presidency.
Nixon was the last to 'boycott' the inauguration in 1974
The approval ratings are bias based. They asked certain people to control the outcome.
Trump questioned Biden's loyalty to America, and with Beijing Biden's dealing with ccp and Russia, it's obvious where his loyalties lay. Obama was accused of not being an American citizen by birth.
Elected with help of a foreign nation? There is absolutely zero evidence to that.
Johnson was impeached by a two-thirds super majority of the House. Clinton had 32 Democrats vote to impeach.
The arrest warrant is bs. It was a show of force because Trump ordered an air strike on a terrorist.
The Democrats in 2016 never conceded defeat, but spent 3 years trying to prove russian collusion, and then the rest of the time trying to impeach him on bs charges.
There was a peaceful transition of power, or did you not watch the inauguration?
Trump didnt incite violence in any way.