Fewer cops means more crime

Chicago is already used to this

[citation needed]
If they get rid of all the cops who will write parking tickets and harass poor people for quality of life crimes?? oh the horror!!!

Looks like you're unaware of the drastic rise in crime all over the country, huh?

Funny because there has not been a reduction in policing all over the country. This would seem to prove my point that the two are hardly related

In the major cities where the police budget and cuts have occured crime is skyrocketing. That is fact. If you don't see the connection between the two, then you're gullible or dumb. Or both.

[citation needed]

Crime is statistically tracked. Fewer cops, fewer police reports, fewer statistics gathered. Hence, less crime. It takes care of itself.

They can defund New York's Police force if they take the part that protects the U.N.

Oddly enough, that hasn't always been the case. Some notable instances of crime actually dropping during a police strike has raised the very valid question of what those police were even doing with their work.

Questions about accountability are always valid
the likelihood (in the absence contradictory proof) that crime will go down in the absence of law enforcement is too remote to factor into discussion.

See, you say that, but like I said - there were some notable instances where THIS HAPPENED.

Like, mathematically HAPPENED. Not as a possibility but as a matter of record.

exceptions don't make the rule

Lower reporting means lower crime.

....yeah, exceptions break the rule. How do you not understand what the word "exceptions" means? You're on the internet right now, look it up, your browser can be used as a dictionary.