"We have airline service that criss-crosses the country and does it in 1/4 the time of the so-called high speed rail"
No ome is asking for trains across the country. We're asking for corridors between Chicago and Indianapolis, Detroit, etc. From Miami to Orlando. From Dallas to Houston. Airplanes require trips to the airport outside of the city two to three hours early. This makes an hour of flying into 4 hours of travel. High-speed rail makes the trip into 2 hours.
"And high speed rail tickets would be 4 times the cost of a plane ticket."
Brightline only will cost $50 for an Orlando to Miami. Southwest Airlines costs over $100.
"(We did all that analysis in California for the high speed rail that was proposed here.)"
California suffers from government corruption. A private company called Brightline takes less time and less money.
"Imagine putting a high speed rail between SF & SLC. It would cost $20Bn to build. And it wouldn't be high speed because it would have stop in Oakland, Concord, Sacramento, Reno, Elko, Wendover before getting to SLC"
It would also be more profitable due to less capacity constraints than airlines, less fueling costs, proximity to downtown areas, and the cost of train conductor salary when compared to pilots. Furthermore, Sacramento to SLC makes more sense due to being in the range where HSR actually functions