Mocking Spongebob

Darwinism is the most cruel to LGBTQ+. If you aren't breeding then you are going to survive.

I mean we have a lot of people on the Earth already, and 400,000 kids are waiting to be adopted. Yea we need to breed, but we've already bred a lot, plus we have the straight relationships that want to have kids, and we have sperm donors, and more. Some women can't have children, does that mean humans aren't gonna survive? No.

lmao we don't need to reproduce in order to survive, straight people do that for us

That would be true it is wasn't for three ideologies the left pushed on society. The 60's pushed the idea of population control because people back then thought the earth would become too crowded. That caused the idea of only having 2 kids for zero population growth started and spread. Now most couples only have 2 kids.

Then Roe v Wade legalized abortion. Now in some places like NYC the abortion rate is nearly 40% of all births.

More recently the media has promoting and popularizing the LGBT community so that the LGBT community can gain acceptance. There's nothing wrong with that but that has spawned the idea of more than two genders. It has opened the doors for straights to experiment more with homosexuality. This is is also causing a decline in the birth rate.

I'm just saying that if we continue they way we are then within a few decades we will cease to exist as a nation.

*aren't - your point still stands. This is why they're pushing so hard for drag queen story hour, and teaching homosexual behavior in schools - they need to recruit in order to keep their numbers up.

Oops. Yes. You are correct. That should have read, If you aren't breeding then you AREN'T going to survive.

At what point are you going to become the knight who says Ekki-Ekki-Ekki-Ekki-PTANG. Zoom-Boing. Z'nourrwringmm?

Unfortunately I can't. This is about as big of a user name as ImgFlip allows. So I will forever (or at least as long as keep this name) be the knight who says Ni.

Ni!

If I wasn't happy with WiseCracker - I might consider Roger_the_Shrubber

Maybe we can get a whole Monty Python and the Holy Grail theme going on if enough people change their names to Holy Grail names. Tim the Enchanter, Roger the Shrubbier, Sir Not Appearing in this Picture, The Old Man from Scene 24, The Black Knight, The Annoying Frenchman, Denis, Zoot, Dingo, Prince Herbert, Concorde, Brave Sir Robin who Bravely Ran Away, etc.

I can drive through the ultra gay part of my neighborhood and there aren't dead bodies in the middle of the road. Darwin promised a different outcome and I'm f**king angry

That's not what I meant. Gays don't reproduce. If a civilization on average produces 2.1 children they are barley hanging on. When that drops then the civilian will eventually breed itself out of existence. The US is at 2.1 right now. The ONLY reason why it is that high is because of illegal immigrants who have larger families.

South Korea's birthrate is at 0.92. So. Korea will simply cease to exist in about 30 years or so.

So if breeders are having fewer children and society is promoting non breeders in an attempt to make LGBTQ mainstream then our birthrate will plummet and the nation will go extinct. Currently there are more people in their 80's then there are toddlers. We haven't seen low of a birth rate since the Great Depression.

"then our birthrate will plummet and the nation will go extinct. Currently there are more people in their 80's then there are toddlers. We haven't seen low of a birth rate since the Great Depression"

good

Misanthropic much

Yeah no shit they also created the word "misanthropy" which is just a shitty sounding word

You got too much hate in you. You need to let it go. It will build up inside you and the next thing you'll know is somehow ended up in the Democrat Party with the rest of the misanthropes and narcissists.

> Somehow relates everything he dislikes to the damn libs
> Tells me to stop being hateful

As if they didn't have enough labeled groups to marginalize and hate, they've turned the Democrats into yet another race to separate complete with genetically conferred mores, culture, and behavioral issues.

So you have no sense of humor also. Come on, man! It was a joke.

No dude, I'm so sorry, dude, (platonically sucks cock)
I'm so frickin sorry bro I was just joking too its just a big misunderstanding that's all

Why do you hate yourself so much?

Because humanity invented the quiche
that shit is nasty

heh heh

LGBTQ+ people can reproduce. Cis men (doesn't matter their sexuality or romantic orientation and men who don't want to have children/biological children) can donate their sperm, and women in wlw relationships can use the sperm to get pregnant and have biological children. There is a youtube channel of a family and the parents are lesbian, they have biological kids.

BTW I am not a "cis" anything. I am a male. Those that want to believe in more than two genders can add all sorts of adjectives to their gender but as for me and the vast majority of the world we are just male and female. We do not need or want an adjective.

OhmygodthatisthestupidestthingI'veeverheardlmao
You are cis, if you are not trans (if you don't identify as your sex assigned at birth), then you are CIS
Okay you live in your little small low IQ world, don't bother with other worlds who are smarter than you.

It has nothing to do with IQ. It has to do with people I disagree with giving me a label I do not agree with. I believe in science. Two biological genders only. Anything other than male and female. Anything other than that is just playing make believe. You can play all your gazillion gender fantasy land games all you want but I live in the real world, I really don't care what you do. It is a fantasy world that I do not care or want to be dragged into.

You see, I am an adult. I stopped playing silly games when I was a child. I'm not emotionally stunted in my growth because I wasn't coddled and over protected by my parents. But in today's world childhood extends into your 30's.

OkAyYy
You don't believe in science if you think that. Only one number off. Three biological genders, intersex exists too, and if you don't believe that, then there is no way you believe in science. But yeah that's biological gender, then there is gender, gender is what you feel, what is in your brain. For me, it's not connecting to any gender, I don't feel male or female or anything like non-binary. Sometimes I connect to gender, sometimes I don't. Gender has nothing to do with biology (if it does, it's not much). It's in the brain, so whatever the type of brain science it is.

Yes, that is true. Some lesbian couple do in vitro fertilization. And that does cause the birth rate to go up. However, male homosexuals typically adopt and that has no effect on the birth rate. They can find a surrogate woman to fertilize.

But now you are getting into a whole new situation where gay couples cause undue stress on the child. It doesn't matter how much the love the child, it is a matter of how best that child can be raised. Children grow up more well adjusted when raised by a loving heterosexual family than a loving homosexual family.

Okay and there are 400,000 kids in foster care, not all straight people can adopt them, so lgbtq+ people can adopt them.

Okay I have done a bunch of research about this, and you are sounding so dumb right now:
There is scientific research that homosexual couples raise children to be kinder, get better grades in school, and have better mental health. My heterosexual parents didn't raise me the best, particularly my dad.

I never said LGBT could not adopt. I said it is not the optimal situation. And tons of independent objective research has shown that to be true.

Look, you can call me stupid all day long but it does not change the facts.

Like I said it has nothing to do with how much love a gay couple has for a child, it has to do with having a male and female figure in their life. It has to do with the frustration a child goes through trying to reconcile why they don't have parents of opposite gender like the rest of the kids. Some kids can adjust to it and other grow up to resent their same sex parents.

That's good that you had good parents.
Oof, I rarely talk to my dad anymore, and whenever my mom makes me ask him something I don't want to, and I'll be frustrated if my dad has to bring me somewhere and not my mom because my mom is nicer than my dad.

What really helped my wife get over her resentment of her father (to a certain extent) is she read a comment from Deepak Chopra. I don't know the exact quote but it is something along the lines, you do not need anyone's approval, you do not need anyone's permission to be happy. You only need to give yourself permission to be happy.

Those words hit her real hard and it changed her life. She was able to deal with her father from then on.

I don't know if you are already living your life that way or if this is something that will help you like it helped my wife.

This part is just my 2 cent on the matter, and not from Chopra. This doesn't mean you have to be belligerent or spiteful to your dad, you just don't need his approval for anything. He will most likely never give you the love you want so the best thing is to not expect him to. And you can still give him love without expecting any love in return. I am just some random dude on ImgFlip. So take my opinion however you want.

My wife is not an avid Deepak Chopra follower and to my knowledge she has never read any of his books. But she did read those words and it really helped her a whole lot.

I know, but I'm saying that people in straight relationships already have many kids, and lots of kids are put into foster care.

Yeah it doesn't change the facts, the scientific facts.

It does have to do with how much love a gay couple has for a child. I have straight parents, one of them doesn't really show much love, I have bad mental health because of him, sometimes I just want to die all because of him, and I'm scared to say certain things when having a conversation with him because he can be rude about stuff I say. I also don't like being around him but I'm 14 and it's in the middle of a pandemic, so I can't really do anything to get away from him.
They grow up to understand why they have same-gender parents. It's not like their parents just not tell them what being gay is.

I had good parents who loved me.

Unfortunately my wife's dad sounds similar to your dad. We've been married for 30 years and she still has the mental scars from him. Once she became a teenager he never talked to her, he only yelled at her. If she needed help with her school work he would yell at her instead of answering her questions.

I am sorry that you have to live in that kind of situation. When you are able to leave your life will get better. Just hang on until then.

* add "unfortunately" after the first and

So why are you worried?

Oh, and that assertion is obviously false because it obviously has not been the case.

And there you are again. Aren't I too "dull" for you to keep replying to EVERYTHING I say? What is up with that? What is your obsession? Go reply to someone who will entertain you.

Aww, your widdle feelz got hurt?
You Demoncratz are soooooooo sensitive.

You'll have to try harder to hurt my feelings. Besides, I'm a conservative. Aren't we supposed to be the ones who have no feelings? How can you hurt something that doesn't exist?

You're just far too boring. You never offer any substance. All you got are insults, and they're the lamest ones.

True, when I had mistakenly figured you were an American it was of the Republican species, and thus you as a Liberal. My bad, Mr Likud.

Golly, wish I though of that myself.
Oh wait, I did.
Glad to see it didn't impact your feelz toooooo much.

Transexual Fish?

that's so f**king hot

Being transsexual is someone who is transgender who has medically transitioned, which other animals do not know how to give surgery and stuff, but they are still transgender. If you want me to explain more then sure I can just ask me to.

"who has medically transitioned..." Never heard that before as a requirement to be transgender.

It's not a requirement to be transgender, I'm saying being transsexual means someone is transgender and HAS medically transitioned. Being transgender is just not being cisgender, it doesn't mean if someone is transgender they have to medically transition, it just means if someone is transgender that they don't feel the gender they were assigned at birth.

You are contradicting yourself in this statement, "It's not a requirement to be transgender, I'm saying being transsexual means someone is transgender and HAS medically transitioned."

No, transsexual and transgender are different. Someone can be transgender without medically transitioning, but being transsexual is being transgender and has medically transitioned.
Transgender: Not cis
Transsexual: Not cis and has medically transitioned

Rules against rape are also in only 1 species. Shall we similarly jettison those?

Yeah

Yeah, rules against rape are only in 1 species, but that's because we are homosapiens and smarter than other animals. Being LGBTQ+ is not a choice, raping someone is a choice.

Maybe “homophobia” only exists in one species because we’re smarter than the animals. Maybe people like you are just not sufficiently evolved to understand it.

Okay raping someone is something that people choose to do, not being cishet is something that people are. There is a difference. It's the people like you who aren't sufficiently evolved to understand it. You can't even understand the difference between being something and doing something.

People can't choose their sexual partners? Who knew!?!?!

They can choose their sexual partners, but who they are sexually attracted to is what they can't choose.

So you're saying they have no self control......interesting. Is that why they're generally liberals? The party of no self control?

It's the same with straight people, straight people can choose their sexual partners, but they can't choose who they are sexually attracted to.
And they do have self-control, I'm saying EVERYONE can't choose who they are attracted to, so you are saying that no one has self-control, and that that's why people are generally liberals. We are the same thing as straights, just don't love who society thinks we should love.

Homophobes try to think of ways to make LGBTQ+ people seem unnatural, but miserably fail lmao

Hacking off your dick & calling yourself a girl is “natural”?

It’s more of surgery and stuff than just cutting it off, but it’s not just calling yourself a girl, it’s feeling like a girl, so how you said it no, but how I said it, yes.

If it’s so “natural”, why does it require surgery. I’m naturally 5’8”. That doesn’t require surgery.

Because the surgery makes them feel more like themselves. Okay that is height, not gender plus that height thing doesn't even make sense.
And your king argument doesn't make sense either, gender is something everyone has (unless they are on the agender spectrum or apogender), while being a king is something you can't just become because not everyone can do that.

I feel like I’m a king. If you don’t call me “your highness” you’re disrespecting my identity, you bigot.

If I feel like I’m a king, does that mean I should be given a crown & everyone should bow down to me?

They are genders, gender is a feeling, girls feel connected to being a girl, they feel like girls, boys feel connected to being a boy and feel like a boy, along with all the other genders. So why aren't xenogenders valid? I understand why people don't understand xenogenders, but if people don't understand, they need to research about it to understand. Xenogenders are mostly used by neurodivergent people, and neurodivergent people's brains work differently, so that's probably why it's harder for neurotypical people to understand.

That's not a gender identity. Plus why do you care if people disrespect your identity if you are disrespecting a bunch of other people's identities?

Why should I respect theirs if they won’t respect mine? I identify as your king. You are clearly regiphobic. You should probably get therapy for that.

There is a thing called kinggender, which is a xenogender, and it's for people who feel like their gender is related to being a king or being powerful, but that doesn't just make them a king.

Those aren’t genders. They’re just feelings. You have no right to impose your internal emotional state on the rest of the world.

There is no kinggender. There are no xenogenders. There are a bunch of mentally ill, emotionally incontinent idiots screaming at the rest of us.

Are you a supporter of pedophilia?

So, “X only exists in 1 species, so we should get rid of it” is a bullshit argument, huh?

That's not how it works, homophobia is hate against people for who they are, rules against rape are rules against people forcing other people to have sex with them, rape is harmful, being yourself is not. Many LGBTQ+ people can't even be themselves at home because of homophobic or transphobic family. For the many transgender people who can't be themselves, almost half of them have tried committing suicide, and over half of them have seriously thought about it.

No, “homophobia” is a bullshit word made up to end discussion by treating everyone who disagrees with you like they’re mentally ill.

“ For the many transgender people who can't be themselves, almost half of them have tried committing suicide,”

It doesn’t improve for trannies who can “be themselves”. Maybe it’s actually just a mental illness & not a lifestyle to be encouraged.

Every word is made up, that's how we have language.
Also, to me, homophobia is not agreeing with being lgbtq+ AND being mean about it, not just not agreeing with it, people have their own beliefs, but it's when they are mean about it.
We don't treat them like they are mentally ill, we are just saying that they don't think being lgbtq+ is right and is mean about it. I mean a lot of them treat us like we are mentally ill already.
My best friend has another friend who doesn't think being lgbtq+ is right, but she's not a homophobe, she's perfectly fine with my best friend being bisexual, and is never mean about it, she just doesn't think it's right. That person is not a homophobe, she just doesn't think it's right. If she was mean about it, then yes she would be a homophobe.

Okay don't use the t slur, it should only be used by trans women.
Pffffft that's just dumb how you said that
1. It's not a mental illness, if you want to call it a mental illness, that means gender is a mental illness lol, plus you were just saying how we treat homophobes like they are mentally ill, yet you say it should be a mental illness
2. It's not a lifestyle, it's just living as your gender. This is the definition of lifestyle:
"the way in which a person or group lives."
Being transgender is not a way we live, it's what we are.

“If she was mean about it, then yes she would be a homophobe.”

What if she pointed out that homosexuals are wildly overrepresented among sexual abusers of minors? Would that make her a “homophobe”?

She's just pointing out something, not being mean about it. Also I've been researching about that, and I've found things saying that there are the same amount of homosexual sexual abusers of minors as heterosexuals, and also stuff saying there are more homosexual sexual abusers of minors. Either way, that doesn't mean that all gay people are child molesters. Plus that was just their attraction to younger people in the study, the studies didn't find out their sexual attraction towards adults around their age.

“I've found things saying that there are the same amount of homosexual sexual abusers of minors as heterosexuals,”

Yes, but since there are many, many more normal people, that means that a gay person is far more likely to be a sexual predator. Learn to think, for Heaven’s sake, not just spew whatever garbage you’ve been fed.

Yea there are many more people that you consider "normal" but that doesn't mean that other people who don't fit your description of "normal" are bad people.
Also from what I read, homosexuals are only a little bit more likely to molest a child, not a lot.

I’ll use whatever words I feel like, you prissy little bitch.

Okay you can say whatever you want, just no slurs.

Your failure to recognize me as your king is a slur, you bigot.

That is not a slur. A slur is a word used hatefully towards a group of people like I just said in my last reply. Okay, so you are a system? Diagnosed?

That's not a slur lmao, a slur is a word hatefully used towards a group, and it's mostly claimed back by the people who it was used towards.

You failing to acknowledge me as your king is a vicious slur. Also, we identify as five separate people, so we're a group and therefore your hate speech is directed towards a group.

If you are gonna be homophobic and transphobic, at least do it right and provide good arguments lmao, all of you homophobes and transphobes arguments are so shitty and the same that I can easily think of something that is true to defend lgbtq+ people, a lot of other lgbtq+ people can also easily beat you in an argument lol.

You wouldn’t know an argument if one slapped you in the face. All you can do is repeat the bullshit you’ve been fed by your indoctrinators.

I was just typing something and it deleted but okay. I've had plenty of arguments. You homophobes and transphobes are the ones repeating the false information you've been fed. lgbtq+ people and allies and smart people may be repeating information, but at least it's true, it's proved by science. Another thing proved by science is that homophobes and transphobes tend to have a lower IQ than open-minded people.
I do my research, and make sure it's true, why don't you do that too lmao.

“Proved by science”

Right. Kinggender & xenogenders are “proved by science”. Good Lord, you people are out of your minds.

“Another thing proved by science is that homophobes and transphobes tend to have a lower IQ than open-minded people.”

If you beat me over the head with a baseball bat for 15 minutes straight, I’d still have a higher IQ than you.

By the way, appeal to authority, which is what you’re doing here, is considered a logical fallacy. You still have no argument, you pathetic little loser.

Well I guess some people are so dumb that they don't believe in science lmao

What is your IQ? Also how old are you?

I have a better argument than you, mine is scientifically proved, while yours is just a bunch of bullshit

Cool. Why is my identifying as king not valid but a man identifying as a woman valid?

There are a thing called xenogenders, where your gender isn't like a gender that is connected to man, woman, and everything in between, so identifying as kinggender is valid, but your gender has to actually connect with being a king, not just wanting to be a king.

Look, we’re talking about the real world, not your D & D character sheet.

This has nothing to do with D&D, this is the real world, maybe you should actually try to understand stuff in the real world.