First video doesn’t contain evidence of fraud but makes notes of errors and anomalies that they admit at one point is not evidence of fraud but a red flag that could be fraud.The thing is, these errors and anomalies are quite easily explained with two very important variables that are being ignored. First, that voter turnout was abnormally high. Second, that mail-in ballots were abnormally high.
Second video the workers were not placing the ballots into suitcases for nefarious mean, but rather into their proper storage containers. The suitcases with ballots were actually absentee ballots that had been packed into those carriers by the workers in the plain view of the monitors and the press. They were doing this because they thought their work was done for the day, and they could leave. When they left the room they were immediately instructed to return by an officer in the next room. Georgia election officials and local media monitored hours of footage from the arena to determine if there had been any wrongdoing. Neither party found cases of fraud from the incident.
That is hilarious that you’re throwing Giuliani under the bus. Can’t wait for Trump’s turn, honestly. It is long overdue.
The former DNI’s memo has nothing to do with election fraud.
https://context-cdn.washingtonpost.com/notes/prod/default/documents/6d274110-a84b-4694-96cd-6a902207d2bd/note/733364cf-0afb-412d-a5b4-ab797a8ba154.
Director Ratcliffe was expressing concerns within the intelligence community in regards to China’s influence being downplayed in favor of playing up Russia’s own meddling. He wasn’t specifically linking election tampering but rather, as Democrats had insisted in the 2016 election, that massive false information was being used to manipulate the public’s political views. Further, his concerns were not even about what China had done but the intelligence community to overlook alternative viewpoints. A valid criticism.
All of this evidence has already been presented before courts and been dismissed as anecdotal. What that means is that you can prove there were anomalies but they couldn’t prove there was fraud. So, they couldn’t dismiss the votes that were within the legal precedent set by the state. That is why voter integrity is now the name of the game.