Seems worth asking: people have offered 225,000 euros for an isolate, and no takers. The vax was based on software models!

Many different teams have isolated the virus. It was pretty much the first thing they did.

And yet curiously the reward is still out there unclaimed.

Yeah, oddly they went straight to using it as the basis for a vaccine for a deadly ongoing pandemic and securing massive government contracts that likely dwarf the 225,000 euros that was offered by obvious trolls.

What a mystery.

Well, that's where you're actually wrong. Because people have captured explicit email acknowledgements (got screenshots myself, but not gonna bother to look right now) that it in fact was NOT used as the basis for the vaccine, but that they modeled it on the software model.

I shit you not.

Out there if you look. They leave a lot to inference and assumption these days. Wholly unsurprising.

This is the full genome of the virus:

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/NC_045512

Feel free to circle the parts that are bioweapons engineering signatures.

And feel free to try to claim the prize money on my behalf. I'm pretty sure I already know how that's going to go.

Can you prove that's not an extrapolated sequence assembled from other Corona class variants? Yeah, I thought not, neither can I.

You remember we're dealing with the people whose PCR chain tests didn't even distinguish a claimed covid positive from the common cold, right?

And still maintain the ridiculous farce that masks with stop the thing from bypassing straight to your eyes, even while they don't bother with masks among people positive for every other virus out there from herpes to papilloma to AIDS, right? Yup, virus experts running the policy show.

AND claim that HCQ is not in fact effective against ALL corona class viri, or works even preventatively, or has a seven-DECADES-long proven safe track record with less risk than aspirin? (Now we know who's really responsible for deaths.)

I'll say it again: CDC people were queried by email as to whether the vaccines were formulated based on the isolate or the software model, and were specifically told they were devised based on the model.

It's THE genome. It's THE virus' genome. It's documented by several teams. If you have any further questions, you should be contacting them directly - for Christ's sakes, geneticists aren't that difficult to get ahold of.

Anyway, you got anything to show me about where the bioweapons engineering signatures are in that badboy?

Having seen my share of scientific outright fraud over the years, I guess I definitely tend more more skeptical, and I'm more aware of things like this (meme I did about 3 weeks ago):

529rm5.jpg (click to show)

And do you really think it's coincidence that they claimed it originated from bats in the wet market . . . when that's only 900 freaking feet away from the Wuhan virology lab? And then they backpedaled. Except until now somewhat recently when somebody was actually trying to push the wet market bat theory again, for the real chumps out there.

You know, the same virology lab that Anthony Fauci provided over $7 million to for coronavirus "study" on two separate trips starting in around 2014/15.

As for signatures, there were Chinese geneticists making that assertion in full presentations as I recall around a year ago. Honestly, given the lies we've seen out of the CDC (and ascribing the 98% flu drop over last year to masks is only one example of dozens), I almost trust the Chinese scientists more than our own.

There's quite a bit more to the story than you'll ever get on the MSM.

No. YOU ARE NOT A SKEPTICAL PERSON. And I cannot make that clear enough.

If I made a YouTube video if I said "don't believe the doctors and the MSM. Think for yourself and do your own research, and you'll discover that all elephants are pink" then that's what you'll post memes about the next day. That's ALL it takes to get you to believe absolute garbage: to load it with phrases you've conditioned yourself to trust.

YOU ARE A GULLIBLE PERSON to the point where it's actually dangerous. Your deep mistrust of expertise and research works against you and you do not have the technical skills to understand when this is being abused by people who have not shown good proof of their assertions.

That's not the media's fault: that's YOURS. It's YOUR responsibility to detect bullshit, whether it's the media who's bullshitting you or it's your best friend who's bullshitting you. Whether it's Walter Cronkite or David Icke, YOU should be applying the SAME standard to both.

And whoever told you that they modelled the vaccine on a simulation instead of the full DNA sequence they've had for well over a year, you should have gone HANG ON A MINUTE, THERE MUST BE A WAY TO CHECK THAT.

The medical community is large, with huge numbers of independent teams constantly peer-reviewing each other's work. THERE IS NO EXCUSE FOR YOUR LAZINESS.

YOU ARE NOT A SKEPTIC.

Or I have more experience than you with scientific fraud and I check into the backstories behind the orthodox narrative.

It's not that I don't get what you say - as you tell yourself - it's that I see beyond it.

I know the field of history better than you do and therefore understand power structures and agendas acting in ways you don't imagine possible.

And I've worked for more news organizations than you have and grasp lots more about journalism and its evolution over the last couple of decades too.

Hope you enjoyed your little slanderous rant, but I've close to said what I need to say. And I maintain you're in for some discomforting suprises in future. Just file it away.

I highly doubt that. I used to sit on a research ethics committee. I denied approval for fraudulent research for a living. Yourself?

Good news

Post a link

How are you on the internet right now if your search browser isn't working?

Nice try

Darkfield microscopy of the first 500 deaths to isolate the virus.

Never been done

Well, the full genome of the virus is right here:

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/NC_045512

Again, it's pretty much the first thing they did, right at the start in early 2020.

Not going to retype the above

The Wuhan bat flu has not been isolated as the pathogen of the pandemic, which is losing its hold

Plandemic

Damn auto correct

You wanted sources, I gave you a huge list of them. It really is the first thing they did. Many times over by several teams.

'MANY times over by SEVERAL teams.'

So, why so much duplication?

Kinda wasteful, doncha think?

Big lies just seem so much more believable than small lies.

... are you asking me why isolating the virus is something that independent research teams might want to do for themselves?

Sorry, Plandemic was declared last March. Virus had not been IDd by doing the Darkfield microscope exam and confirming 500 cases of the same virus. This has been verified by John Rapaport and Dr Ron Paul.

Plants need water; watch the water.

Again, the first thing they did was isolate the virus. Several different teams have done so. I gave you a list of reading to start you off with.