Science doesn't seem to matter when someone's feelings get hurt

well if you made the meme... it must be true. Seems like a buttload of shit but... you're always RIGHT even if the rest of us think you're a domestic terrorist waiting to build your fascist America and boot everyone not conforming to your idea of "Normal"

How many genders are there?

Your right. If only conservatives thinking about climate change used the scientific method

“Climate change” lmao

Let me know when there is proof it exists. I’m waiting.

Simple. The vast majority of scientists are convinced that it's real. That should be enough for you. But I know your type. So lets continue.

Many of you said yourselves that Texas is freezing. Hurricanes and tropical storms are more violent. Heat waves happening more often and are more intense. The 2018 beast from the East caused widespread flooding in the UK, a 40 car pileup, 70mph winds, and pounded Europe. Most of these also happened in the UK. A place famous for relatively mild weather and rain. But on the 18th of March, there was heavy snowfall. 18th of March. Not to mention it was the first time snow appeared in the Sahara in years. Sea levels have risen. Sea ice mass (and glaciers) have decreased.

So let me get this straight, the argument is - a group of endorsed scientists said it was true, so it must be good enough? Yikes.

Did you the argument that “vast majority of scientists are convinced” is false? The is a falsehood based on a deliberate misrepresentation of a single study that suggested “97% of scientists” believe this is a real threat to humanity. 10,000 scientists were sent the questionnaire and approximately 99% never responded. The 100 or so scientists that filled it out sided with the leftist narrative making the sample size of the study of about 1%

Source: “97 percent of Climate scientists agree is 100% wrong”, Forbes, Jan 6 2015

Studies show the Earths temperature is currently cooling slightly, ocean heat is declining, global sea-level rise has not accelerated, and tropical storm energy is at an 30-year low.

Did you know in the ‘70s climate nuts thought the earth was going to freeze over again? By the ‘80s it was now the fear of “global warming”. Since they were wrong TWICE - they changed it to “climate CHANGE” since now they can technically never be wrong. The climate is always CHANGING. Polar ice caps and ice sheets are doing fine. A NASA study confirmed - and I quote - “Study: Mass Gains in Antarctic Ice Sheet Greater Than Losses” and “New NASA Data Blow Gaping Hole in Global Warming Alarmism”.

I get it - you want to be right. You think you’re right. But you’re not. If the sea level was rapidly rising, do you really think Obama would have purchased a $12 million dollar home on the waterfront of Martha’s Vineyard in Cape Cod? Probably not.

Perhaps you shouldn’t get your climate change opinions from AOC.

Funny how you think that all scientists have devoted their lives to deceiving you. And if you believe the 'evil scientists' at NASA, the sure, go ahead.

https://climate.nasa.gov/faq/17/do-scientists-agree-on-climate-change/

I mean, you can do your own experiments on the properties of CO2, methane and water vapour, as well as research how much of these gasses humanity releases compared to volcanoes. If you want, go ahead. I don't care. As long as you use the aforementioned scientific method and use the proper equipment. Just so you know, though, you shouldn't get your climate change opinions from a 2015 Forbes article. In fact, between 1977 and 2014, 83% of peer-reviewed papers in Exxon mobil acknowledged climate change, and so did 80% of internal memos. So, be honest. Which do you think is more likely to be lying? Fossil fuel industries, who would lose billions of dollars if we transitioned to renewables, or scientists who would also lose a paycheck if we transitioned to renewables?

And the thing about the ice sheets and NASA? That's also BS

https://climate.nasa.gov/vital-signs/ice-sheets/

Yup, it’s all “bullshit”. Lol

Hit me up when you see signs of climate change. Until then, keep listening to the 31 year old bartender and an 18 year old Aspergers kid on the effects of “climate change”.

See above for examples. Storms have gotten worse, weather is getting more extreme, sea ice is decreasing, sea levels are rising, snow appeared in the SAHARA, heat waves happen more often and are worse(I pretty much get a heat wave every summer, and it has reached 40 degrees Celsius multiple times). Are you going to present any more proof that I can debunk, or are you just going to sit there laughing at the sheeple?

I’m not going to copy and paste my same argument again - read the facts - or ignore them. It’s up to you really. Just because you copied your argument and pasted it again doesn’t make you right. Lmao

You haven't provided a single bit of evidence for your arguments. I can

https://scied.ucar.edu/learning-zone/climate-change-impacts/hurricanes-and-climate-change

https://cdn.newsapi.com.au/image/v1/9bc6c3cb4226245886d0b883707c6015

And I haven't even gotten on to Australia and bushfires. In some cities, the sky turned red because of all the fire. So yeah. It's warming up

Like I said, believe what you want. The truth is - we will not be dead in 12 years like AOC had openly claimed nor is the water rising. Why in the actual f**k would Obama by a TWELVE MILLION DOLLAR HOME ON THE OCEAN?

So he can just watch it sink into the “rising sea”? Holy shit you are getting played so hard - it would be hilarious if it wasn’t so sad.

Actually, sea levels are rising, and I challenge you to prove me otherwise.

And Obama's net worth is 70 million. And Insurance exists. I hope you know that

Lol okay yup - “Insurance” is a great reason for ignoring “climate change”.

Either Obama is a climate change denier or intentionally knows it is false. Pick your poison.

I'm just saying that it was under a 5th of his net worth, and he probably got really good insurance. So the chances are that he will lose a pretty small percentage of his net worth, and he still gets a decade of holiday home

Actually, I did - you just didn’t want to do any research yourself. So, don’t worry I’ll post it for you to make it easier.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/alexepstein/2015/01/06/97-of-climate-scientists-agree-is-100-wrong/?sh=7b11e1dd3f9f

https://climate.nasa.gov/news/2361/study-mass-gains-of-antarctic-ice-sheet-greater-than-losses/

https://www.forbes.com/sites/jamestaylor/2011/07/27/new-nasa-data-blow-gaping-hold-in-global-warming-alarmism/?sh=96406815f235

https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/10488870/barack-michelle-obama-marthas-vineyard-mansion-under-asking-price/

Ah yes. The sun. Famous for it's unbiased political views.

Notice how both of the Forbes articles are 'opinion'. And, I hate to break it to you, but only the eastern side of Antarctica is actually gaining ice. The coldest place in the world. The Western side is still losing ice. And that isn't even mentioning how Greenland on its own is still losing more ice than the Eastern side of Antarctica is gaining. It doesn't matter if one place is gaining ice. The net amount of ice being gained/lost does. And right now, it is a net negative.

P.S: Alex Epstein proposed that rising CO2 levels will be good for everyone, so don't blindly trust everything you see written by him. Next time, do your own research

" - read the facts - or ignore them. It’s up to you really."

No dude, you're confused; that's you.

Yup! It’s me that’s confused. See you again in twelve years when nothing has changed and AOC looks more like a washed up socialist bartender taking a crack at politics for a living.