Biden bribed Georgia voters, and didn't even pay.

Hey smoothbrain. Biden promised that if he won the Georgia senate, stimulus checks would go out immediately. Yet, because your underdeveloped child's brain didn't know this or forgot, you have to deflect to your TDS delirium to try to excuse your ignorance.

Children like you should shut up until you actually learn something worth sharing.

Read the meme title, and read the meme

"If you send Jon and the Reverend to Washington, those $2000 checks will go out the door, restoring hope and decency and honor for so many people who are struggling right now."
-Joe Biden

Read the meme title, and read the meme

I did that when I made the meme, but I can do it again if you want.

I was talking about the part of you saying he bribed voters.

Show proof Biden sent $2000 stimulus checks immediately after the senate race. We'll wait.

I wasn't talking about that. I was talking about how Clue_Dood said he bribed georgia voters and didn't even pay.

Show proof Biden won fairly, we will wait

I'm on the defending side of the argument. We say biden won, and it's been declared. While you are on the attacking side saying biden did not win. The attackers send evidence first.

Because Biden nti not win. He cheated ad you know it

I know he won. Everybody but the devoted cultists know he won. Even trump himself knows he won. Wanna know why he's saying it was fraudulent? Because he knows the anarchy and devotion of his supporters. They would literally die for him. An example of the chaos they are capable of, is the jan 6 riot.

The grammar was a typo because i have to type fast right now. Also9 Trump won

I bet you didn't even read. That was a rock solid statement. You don't even have the strength to oppose it. You have no evidence the election was fraudulent, you're just a big, whining, baby.

Typo// also I don’t care, i gotta go

You've lost this argument. Buh-bye. Time to storm and fact check your political memes.

He did bribe them, you are then stupid one

evidence?

Evidence he did not?

I'm on the f**king defense side. You can't simply attack somebody with no weapon. You're the attacker claiming it was fraudulent, and I'm the defender saying he didn't lose. So you have to provide evidence. Not providing any evidence will make me automatically the winner of the argument.

Sure it will. I don’t like arguing, but according to all your comments, you think you are always right

I know I'm not always right... But in this argument I am so far. Still waiting on the evidence. If you can't provide any I automatically win the argument due to the attacker making threats but never attacking.

There you have it folks, i gotta go so lets just have our own beliefs without being toxic

This isn't an opinion. It's a fact, you're already surrendering. Pathetic. Bye loser.

I’m back piece a crap