Hmm i wonder what the comment sections going to look like

Against their will.

If that's the case there's only one thing for you to do.

Most Abortions are chemical. Don;t try to fool me.

This is an inaccurate representation of abortions and traumatic to anyone who has ever suffered a miscarriage. Please take it down.

The child, "iT's OnLy A fEtUs", never had a chance.

And some fetuses do.
And now their fighting for what they get to do to their own bodies.

I don't agree with abortion, especially if the father has no say in it. But I also believe it's the women's choice, just not past 19 weeks

And what if abortion is needed to save the women's life?

How often does that actual happen though. My understanding is women mostly get abortions due to not wanting the child, the down's syndrome test, or they believe it would cause psychological issues. But, by all means, save the mother's life.

Past the 19 weeks is when abortion to save the life of the mother mostly happens.

Less than 1 percent of abortions are to save the mother's life.
" Dr. Alan Guttmacher of Planned Parenthood acknowledged, “Today it is possible for almost any patient to be brought through pregnancy alive, unless she suffers from a fatal illness such as cancer or leukemia, and, if so, abortion would be unlikely to prolong, much less save, life.” Dr. Landrum Shettles says that less than 1 percent of all abortions are performed to save the mother’s life.
When two lives are threatened and only one can be saved, doctors must always save that life.
If the mother has a fast-spreading uterine cancer, the surgery to remove the cancer may result in the loss of the child’s life. In an ectopic pregnancy the child is developing outside the uterus. He has no hope of survival, and may have to be removed to save his mother’s life. These are tragic situations, but even if one life must be lost, the life that can be saved should be. More often than not, that life is the mother’s, not the child’s. There are rare cases in later stages of pregnancy when the mother can’t be saved, but the baby can. Again, one life saved is better than two lives lost."

Fair point.
And the other reasons, such as not being able to afford to have it or are not mature enough for it?

When I worked in an ER out in king city, ca, there were 14 year old girls coming in, in labor. They weren't mature enough in my eyes, but were "mature" enough to have sex. How does the saying go? "Made your bed, now lay in it." As well as "raise your children, spoil your grandchildren; spoil your children, raise your grandchildren." As far as not being able to afford it, there are sources for assistance. There are options.
Rape is a different issue. But there's emergency contraceptives that work up to 72 hours after.

There are, but do all women have equal access to them? Should a child be a punishment to its teen parents? What a grim view of parenthood, what a set up for abuse and neglect!

Women having WANTED children is good for them -- and for the larger society.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legalized_abortion_and_crime_effect

(And this leaves aside the question of failed birth control. I know people who have gotten pregnant on the pill, and one who got pregnant after a tubal ligation. They weren't being careless, or thoughtless.)

While yes a lot of the time it's because of poor choices on the parents' side such as having sex at lets say age 14, sometimes the mother had no say in the matter as seen in cases of rape. I don't think it's fair for victims to have to go through something like that when they never had a say to begin with. Part of the problem is that there are people who don't ever have to go through situations like this (such as men who don't have to even stay to support the mother and child and can just up and leave like nothing ever happened) who are like "you have to do this" and telling those who do actually go through it how they should deal with it. Some of them would probably want to get an abortion themselves if they were put in the situation but since it is impossible for the they force stuff onto others.

Third, even in the one-tenth of one-percent of abortions that are done to save the life of the mother, in the vast majority of these cases, an early induced delivery of the baby or a C-section is what is necessary, not an abortion. This early inducement may result in the death of the baby, but it is extremely rare that a baby must be actively aborted in order to save the life of the mother. Some doctors say that abortion is never medically necessary to save the life of the mother

"The woman's rights come first" There is no right to homicide.
"A fetus isn't a citizen" The fifth amendment (one that contains the right to life) does not limit its scopes to US citizens.

It's not part of her body.

"I never said it was part of her body,"
a woman's right over her own body
Sincerely, you

Meh. Take citizen rights out of that. How abt human right. How abt the right to live. Protect life and save all u can. Not twist it around and expand rights to end life

Why does she have to be an American citizen?

I'd rather see an illegal alien get an abortion than give birth to an anchor baby.

Did you ever watch that video?

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=A16gzm9eaa8

Not to say that sounds inhumane, but most abortions occur before 22 Weeks, are chemical-based, and are for the good of the women.

Over 98 percent of the abortions performed today involve women who simply do not want to have the baby. Less than two percent of abortions are for the reasons of rape, incest, or the mother’s life is at risk

The reasons for shooting someone in the face are no one else's business but the shooter's.

Democrat lawmakers wanted to make it legal for abortions to be available for full-term in labor solely if the mother claims it would cause her psychological damage.

Or Physical.