stupid sheep

Always red herrings with the left. They care about the ozone more than pollution because all of their corporate buddies want to strangle small business with regulations, like the carbon credit system, while doing nothing about straight pollution and adding to it with mask mandates and mail in ballots.

Pollution is causing the ozone to vanish, they're all part of the same climate change coin. All the energy left-wingers push for is not pollution. Your logic doesn't make any sense.

No its not the same coin. If I throw garbage in the river, carbon credit schemes will not help keep water clean. Don't conflate logic with parroted nonsense.

I thought you meant air pollution, but..
Left winged people also want to recycle, compost, and I bet 99% of people organizing beach cleanups are left wing. Left winged people do a lot less polluting and a lot more cleaning.

That's not at all true, pal. Look at what 97% of climate scientists are saying: It's true, we're causing it, and we need to stop causing it before it's too late.

Do you mean MAGA or me?

That's what I thought. Cool.

Muh 97% myth.

Nope, 0% myth.

Some cartoonist asked self proclaimed experts and tries to pass them off as scientists. Give a break.

The 97% thing was never "debunked." Only denialists' stupid claims were debunked.

These shitlibs are either dumb, disingenuous or has the memory of a rock.

Oh wait, all 3 apply.

*and scientists and tries to pass them all off as scientists

Do you realize what you're saying? You're saying there's this big conspiracy caused by left-winged people that is somehow happening right when fires in australia, snow in texas, and disasters are hitting everywhere. You're saying the similarities between climate change and weather change are coincidental. You're using the fake time cover (yes it's fake, that's been proven) that says an ice age is coming. You somehow believe that pipelines and other stupid environment-destroyers help the environment and a ton of carbon in the atmosphere is good, because the dinos had that and they thrived! But human biology is different than dinosaur biology, and we suffer from too much carbon! You're dismissing reputable scientists in favour of radio hosts and unfiltered twitter people who didn't study the environment for years and years. On top of that, you're saying that leftists want to burden taxpayers? Are you kidding? Left winged people want to support people in financial distress, support people who are homeless or discriminated!
I bet you think Trump won too. (He didn't, Biden won by a wide margin)

What would you propose then?

On February 7, 2019, Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Senator Edward Markey released a fourteen-page resolution for their Green New Deal (House Resolution 109, closely related to S. Res. 59). These items relationship to climate change are dubious at best and more likely non-existent:
1)"Guaranteeing a job with a family-sustaining wage, adequate family and medical leave, paid vacations, and retirement security to all people of the United States."
2)"Providing all people of the United States with – (i) high-quality health care; (ii) affordable, safe, and adequate housing; (iii) economic security; and (iv) access to clean water, clean air, healthy and affordable food, and nature."
3)"Providing resources, training, and high-quality education, including higher education, to all people of the United States."

The below have merit but need to be phased in, not just mandated without economic plans to control cost in both dollars and jobs:
1)"Repairing and upgrading the infrastructure in the United States, including . . . by eliminating pollution and greenhouse gas emissions as much as technologically feasible."
2)"Building or upgrading to energy-efficient, distributed, and ‘smart’ power grids, and working to ensure affordable access to electricity."
3)"Upgrading all existing buildings in the United States and building new buildings to achieve maximal energy efficiency, water efficiency, safety, affordability, comfort, and durability, including through electrification."
4)"Overhauling transportation systems in the United States to eliminate pollution and greenhouse gas emissions from the transportation sector as much as is technologically feasible, including through investment in – (i) zero-emission vehicle infrastructure and manufacturing; (ii) clean, affordable, and accessible public transportation; and (iii) high-speed rail."
5)"Spurring massive growth in clean manufacturing in the United States and removing pollution and greenhouse gas emissions from manufacturing and industry as much as is technologically feasible."
6)"Working collaboratively with farmers and ranchers in the United States to eliminate pollution and greenhouse gas emissions from the agricultural sector as much as is technologically feasible."

I notice you haven't responded to a single thing I said. Almost like you have no evidence.

I feel like you're the one brainwashed but okay

But... you’re not informed, though?