Smartmatic holds Trump sychophants legally liable for voter fraud lies

Symantic's 285 page court filing citing 16 causes of action for each defendant...

https://www.smartmatic.com/uploads/Smartmatic_Complaint_Against_Fox_Corporation.pdf

Smartmatic just opened themselves up to discovery. Good luck with that.

You might want to read their statement of claim. Like Dominion's defamation case against same, it completely tears to shreds not only the oral claims Sidney Powell, Lin Wood, Rudy Giuliani, et al previously made in the media but further, the entire 'Kraken' case Powell and others built and filed with multiple courts in the past (all of which they lost).

Were you to read the court proceedings from those prior cases, you'd know the allegations made against Dominion and Smartmatic were entirely fabricated, duplicitious and without merit, which led to calls of all the foregoing to be disbarred for their charade. Accordingly, my bet is on both Dominion and Smartmatic to each prevail in their separate legal actions against the defendants.

Not one court accepted or reviewed the evidence - yes, their allegations were labeled as such - now they will have no choice.

Deposition! Can't wait!

Me either, as each of those individuals will be destroyed professionally and financially for having gone along with Trump's big lie. Giuliani and Powell currently face disbarment along with the $1.3 defamation case previously filed against them by Dominion. This suit merely compounds their problems. In both cases, they have zero chance of winning.

Just learned that Lou Dobbs' show on Fox just got cancelled a couple of hours ago on Fox and that Maria's and Jeanine's are also being looked at for cancellation as well. Yep, that's exactly what a network does when their employees are innocent.... NOT!

Not true. I followed all 65 cases reading the motions, briefs and final rulings. While many cases were lost due to lack of standing, others were ruled on based on merit and evidence.

In PA for example, Judge Brann stated..."This claim, like Frankenstein's monster has been hapazardly stitched together with strained legal arguments without merit and speculative accusations...unsubstantiated by evidence"

With respect to the Kraken cases, they were deemed to be "speculative and conjecture" by multiple courts which provided no substantive evidence supporting her claim. Affadavits presented had been written by known con artists; so called experts were proven not to be experts at all in the fields they were speaking about; documents were doctored to misrepresent the courts, etc.

This Michigan case for example, which sought to disbar Powell, Lin, and others, addresses many of the problematic issues with regards to evidence presented in the Kraken cases both within Michigan and other states she filed in. You should read it. It's only 56 pages long.

https://www.democracydocket.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/45/2020/11/ECF-78_City-of-Detroits-Motion-for-Sanctions_King-v.-Whitmer-Jan.-5-202137040773.1.pdf