Gun loving conservative

The only guns there were carried by the Capital police...you know, the ones who killed an unarmed woman.

There were guns, knives, pipe bombs and molotov cocktails. Just because no one was openly waving around their semi-automatic penii doesn't mean there weren't any guns there.

Again, inside the Capital building, the only guns present were those of the Capital police, and they shot and KILLED an unarmed American citizen.

Now run along, child, and let the adults continue this conversation.
Buh-bye

Nope, sorry, you don't get to move these goal posts. You said there were no guns there, now you're trying to say inside the building. You have no idea how many of those militia people were strapped. That unarmed American citizen was trying to enter the chambers where Congress was sheltering in place. She was told to get down from the window at least twice and was shot for not complying. If they had let her in all those people behind her would've flooded in, too. Stop trying to make her look innocent.

Nope...you started this with a pic of a mob INSIDE the Capital building. YOU are the one "moving these goal posts".
You do not get to KILL someone for not complying. Don't you remember GEORGE FLOYD??!! A whole anticop movement began because a cop supposedly KILLED him for not complying.
This US veteran, Ashlee Babbitt, was murdered. SAY HER NAME!!!!
Stop trying to make an unarmed CITIZEN look like a terrorist.

Where did you get the idea that MAGA supporters were promising a civil war? I thought it was more about how they were afraid that the left was going to incite a civil war. The left already has but it is just a one sided war. Their moron soldiers are too afraid to leave Portland, Seattle and a handful of other liberal bastions. They have sure made their cities look like a war zone.

You think it is conservatives who are going to start this civil war? You would be dead wrong. It was always going to be the liberals who start it. They have started every war the US has fought except for the Revolutionary War, the War of 1812 and the recent gulf wars. It is the conservatives who end up getting us out of most of those wars.

So if your little Marxist revolutionaries ever leave their safe spaces then you will get the war you are wishing for.

I think it was conservatives or some republicans making revolution memes, but what do I know

Apparently, not much.

It has been conservatives. Every time something happens or is looking like it's not going there way, I can't tell you how often I've heard or read them talking about how "there's going to be civil war if you try to impeach Trump" or whatever. Good grief, they're just pussing out of everything these days. @@

You just can't control your impulse to lie about every little thing, can you?

No Ones Lying About Anything?

Which really isn't surprising considering the level of intelligence of some of those characters involved in the coup.

Coup? What coup? There was no coup or even an attempted coup.
It was the equivalent of a panty raid, you hyperbolic blatherskite

Oh Yeah, Those Revolution memes.

Those are reactionary memes that are warning you Marxist Revolutionaries that if you try to start a war we will shoot back. That does not mean we want a war, far from it. It just means that if you guys think you are going to take away our freedom and makes us slaves to your Socialist oligarchy then we will fight back.

Let me make this very clear to every liberal out there. WE DO NOT WANT A WAR, PERIOD. I am probably the least violent person you would ever meet. I don't want to see innocent people getting killed and actually I don't want to see anyone innocent or otherwise get killed.

However, there are some things worth fighting for. Liberty being the most important. If you truly understood freedom you would be on our side but you are following like lemmings those who steal freedom from the individual. If you leftists would just WAKE UP!!!. Use that grey matter that is atrophying in your skulls and question everything. Even question yourselves and your own ideologies.

The left seems to think they have an exclusive right to fighting racism, ending poverty, and a whole bunch of other things. If that is true then why would there be opposition? What does the opposition think? Maybe their no opposed to those things after all. Maybe they have a much, much, much better solution than you do. We do and it is very simple. It is called freedom. Learn about it before you throw everyone's freedom away.

Uh no. I've been hearing these threats coming from people on Fox News, in tweets and in comments here, about how if Trump gets impeached there will be civil war, and if basically anything happens that doesn't go your way, that's been the threat. Good grief, you cowards can't own up to anything. You pull a coup, oh it wasn't us. You threaten civil war for four years, oh it was only in reaction to you guys saying you'll start one. LIARS.

Well I don't watch Fox News and I am not on Twitter so I haven't been seeing what you have. However, why would anyone on the right be talking about a civil war? Do you think that we are all just a bunch of trigger happy rednecks just itchin' for a fight?

What is the rationale behind why any person on the right would be talking about a civil war? Could it be to protect our inalienable right from domestic terrorists?

We are not and never have been a Socialist nation. We believe in the rights of the individual and personal responsibility. We believe in being moral people and our morality derives from our belief in divine providence, which is an expression our founding fathers used to mean God. We believe that liberty is more valuable than life and is the only think truly worth fighting for.

Socialism is in direct opposition to everything we believe. It puts the collective above the individual and makes the individual expendable.

Now that Biden has officially become the figurehead of our new oligarchy We The People are getting just a little PO'd watching as you idiots dismantle our freedom.

So do you think that just maybe we might have a reason to want to fight to preserve our liberty? We wouldn't even be talking about any type of war if you guys hadn't become foot soldiers to the global push for Socialism. You have sold us all down the river.

It is most definitely a reaction to the crimes you are committing against yours and our inalienable rights.

I do not want a war. I do not want to see people being killed. What I want is for people on the left to wake up and realize what they are doing to our freedoms. What Biden is doing in just the short amount of time he has been the fake president is pure evil. He is destroying the economy and our liberty. He is selling us out to foreign powers. The Paris climate accords puts a foreign body over the control of our economy. John Kerry is fully committed to the World Economic Forum's Great Reset (aka global Socialism). What just happened when Biden stole the election was the destruction of everything that made America great. Freedom has been lost.

When the civil war starts it will NOT be started by people on the right. Socialists have a long history of violence and wars. The left will start the war and then blame it on the right.

I've had extensive debates with people on this board about this and every time they mentioned overthrowing a tyrannical government, one of the reasons having to do with if guns get banned. My question was "who's deciding whether the government is tyrannical or not?" Because what your side always made it sound like was you were going to overthrow a Democratic president. And look what happened. You finally tried to, just like you've been saying you would. Maybe you missed it but it's happened a lot over the years. I'm pretty sure I heard Laura Ingram saying it, for one, Trump tweeted about it, too.

Well guns is a good place to start when determining a tyrannical government. The exact reason for the 2nd amendment was to fight the government if it became tyrannical in addition to fighting against a foreign invasion. The founding fathers were opposed to a standing army. They would rather the private citizen be armed and if need be, form their own militias to fight to protect our liberty.

Ever since firearms were invented every tyrannical government that has come to power has taken away firearms from the private citizen as their first act. Tyrants do not want to rule people who have the means to fight back.

So guns is always a good indicator of tyranny.

But before any shots are fired there MUST be every other avenue to stop tyranny. It took 20 years before our founding fathers fired their first shot at the British and that was only after everything they could think had been tried.

It is imperative that when fighting tyranny that everything imaginable be tried first. Because once the guns start firing people lives will end and that is NEVER a good thing.

What the individual states must do is exercise their 10th amendment rights and ban the tyrannical edicts coming from Biden's executive orders. When Biden violates the 2nd amendment through executive orders the states must protect the people's rights to bare arms. If this happens at all it will only be the red states. The blue states will sell their citizens out.

The Legislative branch now have a Democrat majority so there no chance of the Legislative and Judicial branches reigning in Biden's tyrannical executive orders.

I still stick to my belief that the left will fire the first shot and then blame it on the right. I have thought that for years and I see no reason to change that belief. And I also believe that it is not a matter of "if" but "when" the next civil war will happen.

What is even the scariest part is it will not at all look like the last civil war. It will be roving bands of left-wing and right-wing militias going through neighborhoods and shooting random people. The left will be well financed and armed by the government. Most of the military will go AWOL because they have sworn to defend the Constitution from foreign and domestic enemies.

Man! I really wish this war won't happen. Maybe it won't. The media is doing everything in their power to further divide this nation. Biden is calling for unity but he means conformity.

You forgot the REASON for it. It's right there.

The Founding Fathers weren't opposed to a standing army, they just couldn't afford one. Heck, they couldn't even afford to make money itself, hence why ours is based on the Mexican Peso they had to use instead of the British Pound. Legend has it Martha donated the family silverware to literally make a few dollars.

THE purpose - as stated - of the Second Amendment was to give men the right to be prepared and able to be CONSCRIPTED at a moment's notice into VOLUNTEER service as militia in defense of the state for which they were to SUPPLY their OWN arms and ammo.

Some "right," eh? Those serfs weren't even initially granted the right to vote but had to be ready to be pressed into service in the protection of their new aristocratic lords AKA their Founding Fathers. hip hip hooray

YOU keep talking about civil war, albeit under the guise of, "I don't want one, but if we really must gotta hafta..."

Civil war against WHAT, btw?

But wait, you've been here a whole almost 4 giganto months?
Thank goodness you ain't been here 4 YEARS. Those of us who have (my original account was from 2015) have been reading this alt blight blathering about this silly coming civil war that the 'you people' are gonna wage against who knows who in the name of Commie Donny and the Playstation gunz.

Heck, I'm a newb to in that regard, because y'all been talking the same crap since that Soviet Kenyan plant, Barack HUSSEIN Obama, was going to install the USSRA Islamic Caliphate and take away everybody's precious widdle gunz as President.

12 years and counting,,, any day now,,, any day,,,

So am I supposed to feel some sort of honor or reverence to you because you have been on ImgFlip for 4 years?

The civil war is the one you guys are planning. It started in the 60's with the Weather Underground. When domestic terrorist Bill Ayers wanted a violent Marxist revolution. He wanted Hillary to join him but she wanted that revolution to be from within the government.

Then there was Occupy Wall street. Now you have your little brownshirts using a tragedy to hide behind. Instead of Kristelnacht (the night of broken glass) they gave us Kristelsommer (the summer of broken glass). You have already started the war but your brownshirts are only fighting this war in their safe spaces. Your spineless politicians are letting them destroy, loot and occasionally murder. If your minions tried this outside of their safe spaces they would (and have been) shut down faster than you can say Antifa.

Now that they have the backing of the US Government, China, the UN and the World Economic Forum the braver Antifa brownshirts might attempt to move out of their safe spaces. Once they do that and try to burn down conservative owned businesses that is when you are going to see push back.

You probably won't see much at first. We may have all of the guns but we are not itching to use them. Your fake president will probably be given an executive order to sign that repeals the 2nd amendment. Biden's controllers are not going to let the Constitution stand in their way.

However, when you start rounding us up for your concentration... oops I meant to say reeducation camps (same thing) then you are going to see a lot more push back.

In true Democrat fashion it will be reported as right wing aggression and terrorism. AOC will start screaming that Ted Cruz is trying to kill her again and maybe this time AOC will make sure she is actually in the same building as Cruz. Maxine Waters will denounce the violence of the right-wing extremists and then tell her supporters, again, to go out and kill them, kill them all. Gov. Cuomo will personally take an AR-15 and kill of all of the remaining elderly in New York, that he didn't kill off with COVID, and say that right-wing extremists killed them. The left will give him another award for that.

Nancy Pelosi will demand that Trump be impeached again. She will get a bill passed in the House that calls for Trumps impeachment on an annual bases for the next 500 years.

What tha hell are you babbling about, newb? Who is "you guys"?

I didn't read the rest.

Sit back and catch up before you screech more about what you don't know about like you always do, your silly ignorant spiel is getting boring.

1/6/21
Course you weren't there, you were here pounding the console about how it wasn't real.

I've run out of replies on your comments. So after this, no more on this image.

Dude!, I think I almost have the 2nd amendment memorized. I clearly know more about it than you appear to know because somehow you found conscription in text that talks nothing about conscription.

Perhaps you have never heard of the Federalist Papers. They started as a series of articles written in (I think the New York Times) back in the 1700's. They were written by 3 founding fathers (Alexander Hamilton, James Madison and John Jays) but each article was penned under the name "Publius". These articles were later compiled and put into a book titled the Federalist Papers.

The intention of the articles were to get people to accept the new Constitution that was created in 1787. There were several articles that specifically address some of the amendments.

The 2nd Amendment was written specifically to empower the people to fight against tyranny both foreign and domestic. It was not about hunting of gun collecting or any other hobby regarding guns. No where does it say that the government gives the orders to form those militias or to control them. Because the government was the specific organization that the 2nd amendment was written about in the event that they should ever become tyrannical.

First you need to understand who the Constitution was written to. It begins with "We The People...". That is who the Constitution is FROM. Then it follows with the mission statement of what is the purpose of the government. After the mission statement it is all about what We The People (i.e. you and I) will allow our government to do and not to do.

It is a document to limit the government from infringing on our rights. Originally many of the founders believe that this was enough but Jefferson prevailed and said that we need more specific about what the government cannot infringe on. So that is where the Bill of Rights or the first 10 amendment come from. Then in the 9th and 10th amendment it tells the government that there are a gazillion more rights that the people and the states have that it cannot infringe on that are not listed.

Considering that before I was born (I am 62 years old so that was a long time ago), we had become less free than we were when England ruled over us it is amazing that no militia rose up to overthrow our government and restore it back to it's proper limits.

That is our 2A right. We can legally overthrow our government and restore our freedom.

Memorized? Then you don't need me to post it again so you can read the first half of it?

But just in case:

The Second Amendment.

"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed"

"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State,"

A

well

regulated

Militia,

being

necessary

to

the

security

of

a

free

State

Sedition isn't the security of a free State, pal.

Where did you get this idea that our currency was based on the Mexican peso? Mexico did not even exist when America was founded. That area was fought over between Spain and France. Mexico declared independence from Spain Sept 16, 1810 but still fought for that independence until 1821. Our currency was based on gold. I was always based on gold until FDR started playing with the currency during the Great Depression and then finally when Nixon took us off the gold standard.

Yes, they were actually opposed to a standing army AND they could not afford one. They were opposed that we would have a branch of the government that was constantly ready for war because they thought that would lead to more foreign entanglements.

There is NOTHING about conscription in the 2nd Amendment. You are way off base.

Read the Federalist Papers. They give more detail about the purpose of the 2nd Amendment and what the founders meant by it.

First there was the idea that the people had the right to form a well regulated militia. Regulated means equalized. The people must have the right to equal or greater firepower.

The people must have the right to bear whatever arms they see as necessary for their own protection and for the protection of their community, city, county, state or nation.

The government must not stand in the way of the right of the people under any circumstance. The right to self defense is an inalienable right and must not be infringed. The left doesn't understand that because they have been told by the TV guns bad.

There is no conscription order in the 2nd amendment. The Bill of Rights is all about the rights of the people and not the power of the government. I don't know who taught you this stuff but you have been severely lied to.

You're kidding, right?

Pounds Sterling,
Mexican Mint Peso,
Dollar,
Quarter,
Two bits,
Google.

Just saw you mentioned the 2nd Amendment. Try READING it.

"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed"

"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State,"

Use Google Translate on that part if you can't figure it.

Oh, and do a little research.

To which I have continued to maintain that the "civil war" Cult45 has been itching for, is really a race war where you cucks can finally openly shoot people of color in the streets like you've been fantasizing about for so long.

No...that is your fever-dream.

I don't want to shoot anyone. Why would I want to shoot people of color? My wife is Mexican. I love her, I don't want to shoot her or anyone in her family. I married into the coolest family.

Where do you get these ideas? They are not grounded in reality.

You really had better examine your own position first. Democrats have started every war we have fought with the exception of the Revolutionary War, the War of 1812, and the Gulf Wars. The majority of mass shooters in this country have been leftists. The rest have been apolitical psychopaths or Muslims.

Starting this last summer your little brown shirts have been destroying and causing violence in all of the liberal safe spaces around the country.

The only thing that you can even point to that was violent coming from the right was the riots in the Capitol Bldg and the jury is still out if those people were right wing or just anarchists. Seeing that their leader tweeted that he was wondering why people kept calling him a Trump supporter when he hates both Trump and Biden, makes me question who perpetrated those riots. I personally do not believe it was people on the right. BECAUSE VIOLENCE IS JUST NOT WHAT WE DO. Violence is you guys and always has been.

I don't care who you're married to. You align with a party that's full of KKK, neo-nazis, and white supremacist militia that wouldn't think twice before taking out you and her for race-mixing. Maybe you both need to examine YOUR positions.

Well the cool looking fella goes by Angeli, so I reckon he ain't exactly white by KKK standards.

btw, is he surrounded by octuplets or something? Other than the one female, can't tell them boys apart.

"Democrats have started every war we have fought with the exception of the Revolutionary War, the War of 1812, and the Gulf Wars. The majority of mass shooters in this country have been leftists. The rest have been apolitical psychopaths or Muslims."

What the heck has someone been spiking your hooch with?

The Revolutionary War: Started by about 10% of the population to fight tyranny. Political parties were irrelevant in this war.

The War of 1812: Started by the British when the Royal Navy kidnapped American citizens and "pressed" them into service in the Royal Navy. A common practice in the UK but we were not part of the UK any more.

The Civil War: Started by Democrats trying to secede from the Union. Abraham Lincoln was the first president in the newly formed Republican party.

The Spanish America War: Started by Republican William McKinley who was being pressured into it by the Democrats. (look it up) McKinley had no intention of going into war.

World War I: We got involved because of Democrat Woodrow Wilson. Wilson campaigned that we would not get involved but as soon as he got reelected he jumped right into the war.

World War II: Clearly that was Democrat Franklin Delano Roosevelt (the worst president we ever had).

The Korean War: Democrat Harry S Truman.

The Vietnam War: Democrat John F Kennedy (the last good Democrat president) - However there was military action that occurred when Republican Dwight D Eisenhower was president. But it was JFK who escalated it into a full blown but undeclared war.

The First Gulf War: Republican George H.W. Bush (It is pretty clear that Bush was not a conservative).
The Second Gulf War: Republican George W. Bush (more conservative than his father but still more of a political hack).

Obama said he would get us out of the Middle East within his first year of being in office. Instead he ramped up the Gulf War and got more US Soldiers killed in his first term then the entire 6 years Bush fought the 2nd Gulf War. Then he got us involved in Syria and Libya. Obama promoted, funded and financed ISIS. Dems try to deny this but facts are facts.

Trump still kept us in the Middle East but put an end to all of the funding of ISIS and they dried up and blew away.

Biden will probably start funding ISIS again so we will see a resurgence of ISIS under Biden. Who knows what wars he will get us in. He has already started stuff with Syria again.

So like I said, Democrats started every war with the except of the Revolutionary War, the War of 1812 and the 2 Gulf Wars. You can make fun all you want but if or when (and I hope it is when and not if) you look it all up then you will know the truth.

What the hell are you babbling about?

What parties were there during the Revolution to start with?

The Civil War was not started by Democrats. In fact, the only Democrats who fought in it were in the Union Army (that's the North, fyi).

Same goes for the rest of your nonsense. Wars are not fought by parties, they're fought by armies, as authorized by the goverment.

Sure, CONservatives love war, it proves how Christian and fiscally responsible they are or some crap, hence the post 1960s switch in which party loves to promotes them (not that the 'other' party has TOO much difficulty acquiescing to them). But certain circumstances, like 1812, the Civil War, WWI, WWII, Korea, or us having to appease France by helping them to reassert control of Vietnam and the rest of Indochina would have ended up with our involvement regardless if there's a D or R appended to the President's name.Sucks, I know.

The crap you said about Obama is a hoot.
ISIL began an Al Queda offshoot which utilized members of the disbanded Iraqi army in 2004, 5 years before Obama even became President. It is funded by Saudi Arabia and Qatar, supplied by Turkey. The 2017 ops against them that Trump took credit for was the final piece of a plan Obama began in 2014.
Not that that matters much, as ISIL - which still exists and is still causing problems, especially in Syria, btw - was routed in that field by Kurdish Peshmerga and Iraqi militia under none other than General Qasem Soleimani - yeah, THAT guy - and his Iranian fighters, who like in Syria, form the largest contingent of foreign soldiers fighting ISIL - more than the US and Russian COMBINED. Yup, that's why we called him a terrorist, because he lead the fight in 'our' war for us against ISIL. Same with the Kurdish fighters in Syria Capt Bone Spurs handed to Turkey, freeing 1000 ISILs in the process.

But in a way Obama IS responsible for ISIL, as his campaign of surgical drone strikes against Al Queda's top brass which left them without leadership and disarray created a vacuum ISIL stepped in to fill. Hooray for facts.

I just skimmed through your bs, it's just a pile of revisionist lies, and embarrassingly cumbersome ones at that, much like your incredibly uninformed take on Birth of a Nation, which you claimed was made by Woodrow Wilson himself, as a documentary about his KKK Secret Service, yadda yadda.

'scuse my typos,,,

So I just showed you a list of every war the US has fought and I showed you that every war starting with the Civil War was started by either a Democrat president or heavily influenced by Democrats with the exception of the two wars the Bush family started.

Then you turn right around and tell me that conservatives love war. Are you out of your mind???? You watch waaaaay too much TV.

Most (not all) of the wars that the Democrats started a Republican had to get us out of. Check the facts.

I NEVER SAID THAT WILSON MADE THE BIRTH OF A NATION MOVIE. What I had heard (and I am sorry that I never verified that) was that Wilson wrote the book that the movie was based on. I never said that Birth of a Nation was a documentary about the KKK being Wilson's or the Democrats defacto police. I have no idea what the Birth of a Nation is about other than it has something to do with the KKK. I never watched that movie, nor do I ever have any interest in watching it. I said that the KKK was very closely intertwined with the Democrat Party in the early 20th century and that Democrats, such as Wilson, used the KKK as their bodyguards or a policing organization. That is a fact.

The Democrat party is and was the party of racism and slavery. It always has been and it still is. The only difference is that today's Democrats are so overtly racist and claim to be the champions of the minorities by manipulating them for votes. And instead of individuals owning other people, now you want the government to own all of us.

Next time READ what I said and not just skim it and them comment on what you got wrong.

AND!!!!! Instead of calling what I am saying "BS", why don't you look it up! The truth is out there because of all of the history revisionism that the Progressives have been doing ever since Woodrow Wilson (who HATED the Constitution).

Now the left is promoting this 1619 Project crap that is so easily debunked it is pathetic. Any historian, even revisionist history, historians worth anything could rip that 1619 Project "history" to shreds. There are no documents that prove anything they are saying and there are tons of documents that prove everything about the 1619 Project a flat out lie. Yet, they are trying to get that taught in schools.

BTW when (or if) you look up what I say, as best as you can go to the original sources. By pass what other people say what happened and find out what the people who were there and did all of that stuff in history said.

tl;dr

You're lying again, and I'm not wasting time on your wall of drivel.

And why should you be so offended about what I said warmongering for profit CONservatives, you ARE after all, a Liberal, are you not, or are you just a RINO?

I will only "'scuse [your] typos..." if you 'scuse mine. :-) I fat finger stuff all the time. So yeah, I will excuse your typos because I haven't a leg to stand on if I started trying to criticize someone else for misspelled words.

When you asked "what the hell are you babbling about" my first thought was "who knows" :-)

I suppose that when the South seceded from the United States then, at first, that dissolved any political parties in the South. However prior to the South seceding they were 100% Democrat. When the Civil War was over they remained 100% Democrat. The only thing you are technically correct about is that it wasn't a political party war. It wasn't a war between Republicans, Whigs, Democrats or any other political party. It was a war fought against Northern aggression where the South just decided that their best course of action was to separate from the United States and become their own nation. There are arguments on both sides about the Constitutionality of secession but I am not interested in that argument.

The fact that you use the acronym ISIL is disturbing. Obama used while the rest of the US used it. Do you understand the difference between ISIS and ISIL? ISIS describes a militant group that wants to take over Iraq and Syria and create an Islamic State (i.e Islamic State Iraq Syria). ISIL on the other hand changes Syria to the Levant. The Levant is Syria, Lebanon and Israel. Obama was specific in using ISIL over ISIS. He also referred to Jerusalem as "Al Quds" the Islamic name for that city.

When Israel has been one of our biggest allies in the world why would the president of the United States slap them in the face by calling their capitol city the by the Islamic name?

The fact of the matter is that Obama was funding and arming Islamic terrorists. That is why he had Ambassador Stevens murdered in Benghazi. Stevens had just come to Libya from Turkey where he was negotiating to get those weapons back so it wouldn't come out prior to Obama's reelection. Stevens failed so Obama had him killed just in case he talked.

I sorry to disappoint you about your favorite president but America was not his first interest. If I remember correctly Obama even said something like that once. I'll have to dig that up because my memory is a little hazy.

You're lying again, and I'm not gonna waste time reading it.

This is what, the THIRD comment with you admitting that I corrected your unabashed ignorance/blatant lying and that you were wrong, yet like the others you then continue on to spew the same exact lies, only retrofitted around the correction with a "yeah, but, still..."
That's silly. Ignorance is one thing, deliberate overt idiocy practically bordering on satire is a whole new bucket of stupid.
You're 61, grow up.

When did WE want a civil war? If you consider us protesting "starting a civil war" then that means BLM is trying to start a war

Kinda funny that all those Trump supporters rioting at the Capitol had no guns... Guess Trump supporters aren't really murderous gun nuts after all...

Guess I should've said the majority is not. I'm sure there's a small number of criminal gun wackos that are Trump supporters. Just as I'm sure there are on the other side. :P

I know these guys were at the Capitol coup. (I didn't make this meme, btw. I found it by searching Oath Keepers here. Whoever made it is obviously a fan or a member).

I read a Tweet by the organizer of the Capitol coup. His name is Mike Dunn. He is not a III%er. I think he might be with a group called the Boogaloo Bois. Regardless, he said in his Tweet that he was wondering why everyone was calling him and his group "Trump supporters". He then said he hates both Trump and Biden.

It was neither party who was involved in the coup. It was some independent anarchists just trying to cause problems. The MSM was very quick to try to blame this on Trump supporters.

But then that was part of the plan. I have no idea if those anarchists were paid or otherwise promoted by the Democrats or not.

The plan was setup to impeach Trump again only this time on insurrection charges. A video of Trump calling for peace the day of the rally was never aired on MSM (I'm not sure but I don't think Fox broadcasted it either). Social media took it down as fast as people would post it. This video was shut down because it would completely destroy Nancy Pelosi's bogus charge of inciting an insurrection. Fortunately I got to see it on one of the alternative social media sites.

So the right had to be blamed for the riot and Trump had to be blamed for inciting the riot so that if they could impeach him and have the Senate do what ever (normally it would be to remove the president from office but they were way too late on that so I have no idea what the Senate is supposed to do at this point) then under the 14th amendment Trump would be prevented from running for reelection at some point in the future.

Where was all the gunfire if a bunch of people with AR-15s were rioting? Riddle me that.

Seems like the left can't keep their own narratives straight most of the time.

1. InarenCorp

Kinda funny that all those Trump supporters rioting at the Capitol had no guns... Guess Trump supporters aren't really murderous gun nuts after all...

2. InarenCorp

Guess I should've said the majority is not. I'm sure there's a small number of criminal gun wackos that are Trump supporters. Just as I'm sure there are on the other side. :P

3. InarenCorp

Seems like the left can't keep their own narratives straight most of the time.

You sure love Stanley Tucci in the Hunger Games. Is this who you envision yourself being in the Biden administration?

Stanley Tucci is the bomb tho. I've always wondered why all the hunger games character memes

So then you are planing on eating everyone in the Biden administration then...

A narrative and a sentence are different, as I didn't supply two conflicting ideological bullet points, but I do admit I made a mistake in my wording. :P