The swamp is alive and well again under Biden/Harris

So Trump failed to drain it, then?

Trump didn't just fail to drain the swamp, he actively facilitated its expansion.

https://apnews.com/article/donald-trump-lobbying-e911209abab83899eadd18b5776f6095

https://www.citizensforethics.org/reports-investigations/crew-reports/president-trump-legacy-corruption-3700-conflicts-interest/

I never understood how corruption was something you could solve by giving the job to the guy who more often than not wrote the checks in the first place. But that was the whole point, wasn't it? The right wing just wants to be the people who get to do it.

True

President Trump exposed the corruption of the politicians and the leftist media who protect them. He will continue this when he defeats Harris in 2024 after 4 years of abysmal failures, a struggling economy and a radical agenda has been in place that people see how horrible the leftist ideals are in truth, not just utopian talk. We are headed for tough times ahead with these two clowns at the helm. Trump 2024: "Fix The Fix"!!

No offense, but y'all kind of lost the right to predict the future about four months ago.

I'm not 'y'all'. I am an individual who predicted months before the election with all of my conservative friends that I thought Trump would lose with all of the mass mail in ballot fraud that was sure to come and the Dems single handedly crushing the economy with long, drawn out shutdowns and fear mongering. They took a disaster and used it to their advantage. Straight out of the liberal handbood to not let any crisis go to waist. They HAD to kill the booming economy to win and they needed a crisis to use the mail in ballot scheme to help to. The perfect storm. Go socialism!!!

And after 63 court rejections of your thesis that there was ballot fraud, you were pretty much shown to be wrong: Trump lost the election because America doesn't like him.

If you were so good at predicting the future, one would think you would have been a bit more proactive about gathering evidence that would have held up in court.

So how about listening to people who were right? Instead of wheeling out more predictions to be bogus about, why don't you start asking what those people saw that you missed?

Most of that is nonsensical BS. lol. Regardless, if a court won't even look into allegations, how do you prove what you saw with your eyes, or even caught on film? If you can't prove what was in a box (like ballots added or thrown away), what you saw doesn't mean anything in court. Just because the fraud was not provable, it doesn't mean there was no fraud. Remember the dumped ballots found by a river bank? Probably not because you sound like a CNN viewer. Lots of pole workers and watchers saw lots of wrongdoing and law breaking, but if nobody looks into it, it never happened. lol. I suppose the cocaine stained laptop of sweet innocent Hunter Biden contained no incriminating evidence either since the FBI sat on it for a year and never bothered looking into it. See how NOT looking into wrongdoing and law breaking means no laws were actually broken according to a court of "law"?

It did look into allegations. 63 times. And they ruled that the case failed to meet minimum legal standards.

Ya just made my point. Thank you.

Did I, though?

Did you eat lead paint as a child? Asking for a friend.

Resurrected a bank that conservatives have been fighting for years to close down... rescinded his own executive order that was THE DRAIN, bit it seems Donny likes the new level of corruption he had access to, so he kept it. Trumpy thought he knew how to swindle and defraud until he got in there, and the power drove him insane.