Freedom of Speech

206 views • 4 upvotes • Made by gabebreier 4 years ago in politics

8 Comments

[deleted]
3 ups, 4y, 1 reply
Communism has a commercial app market that it retains private corporate rights to?



You really don't know what that word means, do you?
lokiare
0 ups, 4y, 1 reply
Why are they banning it? Is there illegal content on it? Is there some malware in it? No, its because they don't want people to have access to it. So I guess Google and Apple are no longer protected by section 230 because they no longer qualify as platforms.
[deleted]
2 ups, 4y, 2 replies
You know how you were wrong about Mike Pence? And the electors? And SCOTUS? And the 63 lawsuits? And the state certs? And the election? 



Well, you're also wrong about Section 230. Stop getting your legal knowledge from InfoWars.
VagabondSouffle
1 up, 4y
... from a script.*
low rated comment (click to show)
lokiare
0 ups, 4y, 1 reply
[deleted]
2 ups, 4y, 1 reply
Well, don't worry - the seditiously trecherous veep has been fired and will be replaced in a week and a half.



Section 230 was particularly noted for allowing social media to exist BECAUSE it allowed moderation of content. Your legal theory is dumb and it is just another of a long list of things you are wrong about. You listen to people who are wrong. You are not the brightest bulb in the room.
lokiare
0 ups, 4y, 1 reply
No. It allowed content to be blocked until age verification for children. It did not allow them to block anything they wanted for any reason.
[deleted]
1 up, 4y
What. Utter. Nonsense.

Show More Comments

Created with the Imgflip Meme Generator

IMAGE DESCRIPTION:

"TO THE CORNFIELD, PARLER!" - APPLE AND GOOGLE; WHAT COMMUNISM LOOKS AND SOUNDS LIKE...