And somehow an explosion in Nashville is Trump's fault.

Not much of a terrorist act. No one was killed. Meanwhile, in Chicago that weekend at least 7 were killed and another 30 injured by gunfire. But since that’s blacks killed by other blacks, you don’t really care.

Fortunately, such acts are massively outweighed by routine black violence in this country.

Black violence is a myth. Created by the jewlunati!

Oh, that’s why Trump hasn’t spoken a word on an act of domestic terrorism that took place on one of this nation’s biggest holidays?

He was golfing and never missed a swing.

Fake news. It wasn't a terrorist act. It was a cleanup for dominion.

“That's exactly how Journalism works. As opposed to say CNN and their 'anonymous sources' that have been wrong nearly every time they've spoken.

I can't believe you don't know basic debate.”

Now you’re just being silly.

When you attempt to validate a point of view in a published article as “journalism” using your articles which also reference which also reference you own articles, ad nauseum, you’re constructing a narrative based on a house of cards. That’s bad journalism.

Anonymous sources are the cornerstone of American journalism and are protected under the First Amendment as free speech. Hell, Trump uses it all the time when he says bullshit like “people are saying...” or “I heard somewhere...” and then proceeds to lie his ass off. Tucker Carlson used it as a defense when he falsely claimed a few weeks back that “someone” sent him irrefutable proof on a thumb drive that conveniently got lost by FedEx, was then found and then it was discovered there was nothing on the thumb drive...or something like that.

You can thrown around terms like ‘ad hominem’ and other buzzwords ‘conservatives’ love to use, but it doesn’t mean it actually applies.

The article is full of pointless nonsense that references more pointless nonsense and lies and all of it spirals itself into oblivion. NewsMax and Fox News have publicly stated that they have absolutely no evidence of voter fraud. It doesn’t exist. So chasing red herrings down rabbit holes regarding Dominion or whatever flavor-of-the-moment bell you crackpots are ringing, it’s all a waste of time.

The facts of the article...Company A sold to Conpany B who transferred to Company C...may be correct but they are all ultimately pointless, because there’s no evidence of voter fraud (other than the Trump supporter who had his dead mother vote for Trump and got caught).

So, yes, “vetting” the source of the article is 100% acceptable and should be encouraged. I get my news sources from established, credible outlets and journalists who’ve spent their entire careers in the pursuit of truth.

You get yours from college kids attending C-level universities that are touted by conspiracy-promoting, crackpot websites. Is that an ad hominem attack or am I just being a reasonable?

It’s a rhetorical question, because I know what the crackpot is going to answer and I know what a reasonable person will answer.

For the record, GWAR is a great band. It just sounded funny to throw them in.

Wall of text TL;DR "nu uh".
Sorry please provide facts in your responses.

If you didn’t read it, you wouldn’t know what it is to respond.

Your acquiescence is accepted. Try using facts next time.

I read it. There are no facts presented just a wall of text treatise on how you are right and I'm wrong. That's the "Wall of text TL;DR "nu uh"" defense.

You’re objectively bad at this.

Your present articles riddled with pointless info presented as revelations, even though they were *actual* press releases from the companies your hack of a nephew tried to tie to some grand conspiracy. Your hack nephew then sources himself in spinning a grand yarn, even though news outlets like NewsMax and Fox News who had previously carried Trump’s bag in his asinine lies regarding voter fraud have all backpedaled furiously and stated outright there has been zero evidence of voter fraud, thereby invalidating your nephew’s grand exposé in one fell swoop.

Not TL;DR at all. Pretty simple really.

Again, present actual facts. Not your “alternative” facts.

https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-factcheck-att-dominion-nashville-bomb-idUSKBN2931BI

Your assertions, sir, are utter horseshit.

https://nationalfile.com/solarwinds-parent-company-owned-data-center-affected-by-nashville-christmas-day-bomb-until-2015/

I don’t opt to get my vetted news from a 21-year-old polysci major who’s only significant accomplishment to date is being featured on InfoWars.

Take off the clown shoes.

Ah yes, so you can't refute the facts presented? Ok, I accept your admittance of defeat.

Your source isn’t a source. You haven’t presented any facts.

Still waiting for a refutation of facts. See what you don't understand is in the story of the boy that cried wolf is that he was telling the truth the last time before he got ate up. You vet the facts not the source in case they tell the truth one time. Its very easy. You follow the facts to their original source and then verify that they are in fact true.
After that you discuss the ramifications of how it affects the situation. Unfortunately leftists outright lie so they have to be disproven constantly, whereas conservatives will just not talk about certain things or spin the story in their favor.
You must constantly be aware and suspect every source is lying and then check it to make sure. That's the only way to be informed with the truth.

Ok, I was actually uninterested in doing this but now I’m bored so let’s refute.

First, it’s important to understand that when you “vet facts,” the source is 100% considered. This kid is not a reliable source. At all.

Second, he footnotes a few things off the bat with links to press releases, etc. from the companies in question that he’s strung together like Charlie Kelly in the basement of an office building. Then, he proceeds to footnote himself in previous articles, like this one: https://nationalfile.com/trump-solarwinds-breach-may-be-china-msm-wont-admit-due-to-financial-reasons/

This article is riddled with falsehoods. In it, Trump ‘suggests’ China was involved in the attack. Yet every major governmental agency involved has unanimously stated that Russia was the culprit, and that includes Secretary of State (and noted POS), Mike Pompeo, in direct opposition to Trump’s bullshit assertions.

Andrew White then proceeds to make more bullshit claims and assertions and backs them up by referencing and footnoting...himself.

That’s not how reporting works. You’re not your own source. Journalism 101 here. And especially when you’re an unreliable source.

I can’t believe this needs to be explained to you.

Nope. Incorrect again. https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Argumentum_ad_hominem
Its a form of ad hominem attack to 'vet' the source.
So China might not be involved, but the building had an office for the owner of Dominion. That's cold hard facts.
Sources for governmental agencies claiming Russia, Russia, Russia? Only thing I saw was one agency that said no one interfered.
You an reference an article you wrote earlier that has facts that are backed up by footnotes. That is acceptable. You are meant to read the article referenced and vet its facts as well.

That's exactly how Journalism works. As opposed to say CNN and their 'anonymous sources' that have been wrong nearly every time they've spoken.

I can't believe you don't know basic debate.

Virginia Commonwealth University’s most notable alumni are Flounder from National Lampoon’s Animal House and GWAR.

Now I guess they can add Andrew White to that esteemed list. It’s an embarrassment of riches.

So again, you are admitting defeat? Why must you do it 3 times?

Oh, you must’ve been getting too woke from Facebook to realize you replied to my credible source with a poorly-written piece of nonsense from some college kid.

https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-factcheck-att-dominion-nashville-bomb-idUSKBN2931BI

Nope, woke is a leftist term. I'm not woke at all. Woke means you stick your head in the sand and believe everything told to you by CNN. I vet my facts.

Once again you missed the point. Your article says AT&T was hiding the dominion voting machines in the building and the RV destroyed it.
No one is claiming that. An office in the building held records about Dominion from when they owned it. That's it. Its verified and factual. The records are public. Please stop with the fake news.

Nope, there is no tie between AT&T and dominion. No one claimed that. It was an office of a company that owned dominion and their records were stored there. Your fact check site is debunking a strawman.

Some actual sources would be great. Not your nephew who’s a junior in high school.

https://nationalfile.com/solarwinds-parent-company-owned-data-center-affected-by-nashville-christmas-day-bomb-until-2015/
Please refute the facts instead of insulting the people who wrote it. If you can prove that the building that was destroyed was not owned by the company that had the data center for Dominion then we can continue. Otherwise any other response is you deflecting from the truth and an admittance of defeat.

Okay so it’s either my explanation or your wingnut theory. Either way, Don the Con never broke stride on the golf course.

And what did blowing up an AT&T building have to do with Dominion?

Hold on, let me get my popcorn. This should be fun.

Or it could have to do with the fact that no one was killed, so relative to the vile efforts Democrats are making to destroy our democracy, it is of light importance.

There was an explosion in a major American city that knocked out wireless services to a large area of the Southeast. That doesn’t require some attention?

Any attention?

No attention?

Because Trump has paid it no attention. Just kept golfing like he has for more days of his presidency than any other in history, by far.

It’s been accounted for.

No. It hasn’t.

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/girlfriend-nashville-bomber-warned-police-he-was-building-explosives-2019-n1252536

And they still don’t know why he did it.

And Trump hasn’t said a word. Not a word.

I wonder what would’ve happened if a Democrat was in office and something like this happened and he went golfing? You’d all lose what’s left of your everloving minds.

It’s all been accounted for. If that explanation covers my election question, it covers this.

Sources then please.

Leftists don't provide sources. Here is a source anyway: https://nationalfile.com/solarwinds-parent-company-owned-data-center-affected-by-nashville-christmas-day-bomb-until-2015/

“Nope, see you lost the moment you attacked the source and not the facts presented. I accept your admittance of defeat.”

It’s actually sad how delusional you are. Good for you. You ‘win.’

But did you? Because no matter how much BS you spew, it doesn’t change the fact that Joe Biden will be inaugurated as the 46th POTUS on January 20th.

Enjoy your ‘win.’

Once again you don't understand how things work. You attack the facts presented not the source. If you attack the source you show everyone that you are not discussing things in good faith and are in fact committing logical fallacies.

Garbage source. Written by a kid in college who’s claim to fame is being in InfoWars.

Thanks for debunking yourself.

Nope, see you lost the moment you attacked the source and not the facts presented. I accept your admittance of defeat.