I'm not your dude, and for the hundredth time, this has nothing to do with what the news say: 60 lawsuits and not one time - not one single time - does a judge write in the ruling that they accepted evidence of even a single fraudulent vote.
Why are you so obsessed with CNN? I don't care about CNN. If fraud was as obvious as you say it is, you should be able to get AT LEAST ONE vote struck down AND YOU HAVEN'T.