Allen West - I suppose he ain’t black, either

Election law is set at the state level. Sometimes as the county level. Texas is not allowed to tell Michigan what to do with its state laws.

Y'all knew this going into it. You've only yourselves to blame for your failure to explain to SCOTUS why this concerns them.

No its not allowed to tell them what to do with their own laws. When their laws are unconstitutional and violate federal law, and affect all states (as in a presidential election), then they do have standing to sue the state (not the individuals inside the state or lawmakers).
Its too bad the SCOTUS threw this one out, we now having standing to completely ignore any and all federal laws and executive orders JOE or Kamal make. What are they gonna do? Sue us in the SCOTUS?

No. The person whose constitutional rights have been violated sues the state to the Supreme Court. Not Texas. Michigan did not change one single Texan vote. That's what standing means.

The lawsuit has to come from the people whose votes were doctored AND YOU CAN'T FIND THEM BECAUSE THEY DO NOT EXIST.

So, then every citizen in the US should file a lawsuit against the swing states? Because my vote doesn't count due to the massive fraud and illegal unconstitutional changes that those swing states made.

No. Your vote wasn't fraudulently changed. Find someone whose vote was fraudulently changed. If you have the evidence you say you have, there should be millions of furious voters with standing to sue their state. So where are they?

Unable to sue due to financial reasons or they joined the Trump lawsuits.

No, see, Trump should be joining them! Not the other way around, Trump doesn't have standing. His vote wasn't changed.

I would be fine with that.

No shit you would be, Sherlock Holmes - of COURSE you would be fine with Trump pursuing a legal strategy that would actually work - but Trump can't do that because HE CAN'T FIND VOTERS WHO HAVE STANDING because NOBODY CAN PROVE THAT THEIR VOTE WAS FRAUDULENTLY CHANGED.

There are hundreds of people that went to vote and were told they had already voted. You need to check your facts. Remember CNN is on the talking point of "Not enough fraud to swing the election". You really need to catch up.

"THEN WHY AREN'T THEY IN COURT? WHY IS IT ON ME TO BELIEVE YOU INSTEAD OF ON YOU TO CONVINCE A JUDGE?

Over 50 lawsuits and NOT ONE vote has been ruled fraudulent! NOT ONE!"

Lots of reason. Courts won't hear them for one. Leftists are threatening to kill them is another. No funding (it takes thousands of dollars to bring these kinds of suits). Not knowing they can do it is another. None of the legal funding sites will allow you to raise money for a case like this. I tried.

THEN WHY AREN'T THEY IN COURT? WHY IS IT ON ME TO BELIEVE YOU INSTEAD OF ON YOU TO CONVINCE A JUDGE?

Over 50 lawsuits and NOT ONE vote has been ruled fraudulent! NOT ONE!

Yep he's technically right by extension.
If a judge or less can allow a change to circumvent the state constitution because the situation calls for it, then any other state can do the same on any basis and the supreme court can't take the case because they've just set the precedent that outside states can't sue them for it.

Could be one hell of an advantage in forming a pseudo-union, although I'd just use it to screw with blue states by changing things to coerce all the drug addicts, drug dealers, criminals and mental cases to move to liberal areas.

Exactly. At least each of the four states and Nevada and Arizona are filing their own suits suing their own states. If Texas doesn’t have jurisdiction to sue other states, the individual states certainly have jurisdiction to sue themselves. This is far from over.

Learn about the Plenary Powers of the State Legislatures in regard to the Electoral College votes. They don't need Supreme courts state or federal to overturn the election and many legislatures have already held hearings into the evidence for election fraud so the chances of them deciding to use the Plenary power vested in them by the Constituition and an overiding of the Electors in the Electoral college occuring is better than a small chance of what will occur.
No court can overturn an enacted Plenary Power, Game over Democrats.
Kamala still hasn't vacated her Senate seat, Why?

I just read about that! These looney lefties who are absolutely fine with election irregularities, massive election fraud and unconstitutional voting changes as long as sleepy, creepy China Joe is president disgust me. It’s hilarious that they think Safe Harbor day was the end of this. The Electoral vote isn’t even the end of this. The media will eventually need to tell them all the truth. They better reserve their safe space and stock up on tissues and Vaseline!

Hahaha yep.
I've given up telling people on the left about this as they don't seem to want to go find out what i'm talking about. Also the E.O from 2018 had declared a State of Emergency in regards to federal elections. That was put in, in case of funny business and I dont believe we get any reports from the powers enacted there for about another 5 days. At which time any foreign interference that occurred or didn't must have preliminary evidence presented and which would be used to consolidate the already obtained information. If those voting machines sent information to servers outside of the U.S then once again it's NO Biden.

Yes. They tried like hell to hide the audit reports but they are being leaked anyway. They were certainly hooked up to the internet and that fake ballots were sent in batches for “adjudication” in either Germany or Spain. The error rate for ballot verification was set to 1000s of times the legal rate. Massive amounts of fake ballots were sent to Europe, where they were “approved” and tabulated. NO Biden!

On September 12, 2018, President Trump issued an Executive Order to impose sanctions for interference in our elections by foreign powers. It calls for the Director of National Intelligence, who is currently John Ratcliffe to issue a report no later than 45 days after the election, on December 18th, which is next Friday.

If Ratcliffe admits this evidence, the EO calls for the blocking of all property held in the US by the perpetrators.

Again, the receipts have now been leaked. It’s over, Joe!…You better concede or we’re going to throw your ass in prison!