Imgflip Logo Icon

Elena Parent Debunking Herself

Elena Parent Debunking Herself | DOESN'T MATTER IF I'VE HEARD EVIDENCE ALL DAY AND HAD THE CHANCE TO QUESTION WITNESSES; CNN TOLD ME THAT BILL BARR SAID 'NO EVIDENCE', SO I'M GOING TO BELIEVE THAT | image tagged in debunking her self,elena parent,2020 elections,trump won,democrats lie and cheat | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
102 Comments
4 ups, 4y,
1 reply
https://apnews.com/article/barr-no-widespread-election-fraud-b1f1488796c9a98c4b1a9061a6c7f49d
Barr told the AP that U.S. attorneys and FBI agents have been working to follow up specific complaints and information they’ve received, but “to date, we have not seen fraud on a scale that could have effected a different outcome in the election.”

“We have many witnesses swearing under oath they saw crimes being committed in connection with voter fraud. As far as we know, not a single one has been interviewed by the DOJ. The Justice Department also hasn’t audited any voting machines or used their subpoena powers to determine the truth,” he said.

However, Barr said earlier that people were confusing the use of the federal criminal justice system with allegations that should be made in civil lawsuits. He said a remedy for many complaints would be a top-down audit by state or local officials, not the U.S. Justice Department.

“There’s a growing tendency to use the criminal justice system as sort of a default fix-all,” he said, but first there must be a basis to believe there is a crime to investigate.

“Most claims of fraud are very particularized to a particular set of circumstances or actors or conduct. ... And those have been run down; they are being run down,” Barr said. “Some have been broad and potentially cover a few thousand votes. They have been followed up on.”
4 ups, 4y
Yup. MSM summarizing what Barr said, and then chopping it up into sound bites, to push that "no evidence" narrative. We should expect this from what they've shown us. They're really jumping the shark on themselves. They really must believe people won't bother to fact check for themselves.
[deleted]
5 ups, 4y,
1 reply
Creepy Condescending Wonka Meme | HOW ARE THESE TRUMP ELECTION FRAUD CLAIMS DOING IN COURT? TELL ME MORE ABOUT HOW TRUMP HAS LOST EVERY CASE. | image tagged in memes,creepy condescending wonka | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
2 ups, 4y,
1 reply
Tuxedo Winnie The Pooh Meme | listening to the election fraud hearings falsely claiming evidence doesn't exist | image tagged in memes,tuxedo winnie the pooh | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
[deleted]
6 ups, 4y,
1 reply
made w/ Imgflip meme maker
Watching the train wrecks makes it that much clearer. Fake allegations are fake
1 up, 4y,
2 replies
https://twitter.com/PandaTribune/status/1335193296403128320

Fake News is fake. Sworn testimonies are not.
[deleted]
5 ups, 4y,
2 replies
Once again, how are those testimonies holding up in court?
[deleted]
2 ups, 4y
I mean if you look at the cases most were withdrawn or dismissed most of the denied cases were from Pennsylvania, which were asking for ballots without addresses to not be counted however in Pennsylvania there is no law saying there has to be an address which is ludicrous to me.
1 up, 4y
resort to original post
[deleted]
4 ups, 4y,
1 reply
“What'd you guys do, take it and do something crazy to it?”

When your lawyer is telling you to shut the f**k up, because you are bringing the false accusations to far
[deleted]
2 ups, 4y,
1 reply
Um... you have a picture of a Republican here.

Are you saying the Republicans are using falsified information?
1 up, 4y,
1 reply
Who said this was about Democrats VS Republicans?
[deleted]
4 ups, 4y,
1 reply
Let me get this straight...

You are saying, the Republicans stole the election for the democrats, and now Republicans are fighting Republicans to prove it?
1 up, 4y
No. You pointed out it's a Republican. Does that mean that all Republicans are in on the steal? Or just a Republican reading out what his notes say?
3 ups, 4y,
1 reply
Makes perfect sense to me
4 ups, 4y
A normal person: "The sky is blue"
MSM: "What do you mean the sky is blue, haven't you ever seen the night sky?! GEEEEZ"
2 ups, 4y,
3 replies
And now Newsmax:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ucxF3nwnj8Y&feature=emb_logo

You posted this meme 3 weeks ago, and we STILL have not seen any proof of fraud.
What an embarrassing time time to be a tRUMPf supporter.
1 up, 4y,
1 reply
I never said that Hugo Chavez had anything to do with our election.
1 up, 4y
1 up, 4y,
1 reply
The fraud was presented, you just ignore it and/or are incapable of looking it up.
1 up, 4y,
2 replies
No fraud has ever been presented. NONE. ZERO. What I get is people giving me conspiracy theories to prove their conspiracy theories, but not one single piece of proof. Plus you and I know that you have a dozen alts because you use the same sentences over and over again.

And I have spent the last 55 days looking it up. And guess what I've found. NOTHING.
Time to prove it or STFU.
0 ups, 4y,
1 reply
"No fraud has ever been presented. NONE. ZERO." --- Yea it has. The fraud was presented, you just ignore it.
1 up, 4y,
2 replies
How many times can you say that? You say that with all your alt accounts.
Once again, I have been showed nothing. Judges and the SCOTUS and Guiliani and Barr have all been shown nothing. So how could you have shown ME?
I don't ignore anything. I am eager to see proof. What proof have you shown?
0 ups, 4y,
1 reply
How many times can you say that evidence is "ZERO EVIDENCE" and that sworn affidavits "mean NOTHING!!!"?

You sure cry a lot when Democrats get caught. Are you in on the fraud?
1 up, 4y,
1 reply
Tell me how a sworn affidavit is evidence. You provide no links, no articles from non-radical right-wing conspiracy sources, you provide no person or group who has accepted the evidence. You provide no court transcripts. All you have is some old lady signing a piece of paper saying she saw some kind of fraud. Show us proof. Or at least show us the affidavits. Where were they? Exactly how many? Who were they given to? Who reviewed them? What judge? What notary?

Answer this question if you have any brain cells that allow you to....if the sworn affidavits are so iron clad and definitive, then why is tRUMPf 0-55 in court. Why did the SCOTUS shut tRUMPf down 3 times...UNANIMOUSLY.

Give it up you fake news peddler. You are a traitor and piece of garbage spreading lies and fake news. All you traitors will regret your sedition when the American people decide to have justice for your actions. And I'll sign a sworn affidavit for that.
0 ups, 4y,
1 reply
"Tell me how a sworn affidavit is evidence." --- An affidavit is admissible evidence

"You provide no links" --- I don't need to. You claimed you watched/listened to the hearings. I don't need to post any affidavits, you can look for them. I don't need to show you anything, I'm not the one that personally saw anything, besides affidavits and video footage, which you deny as evidence.
1 up, 4y,
2 replies
Hearings and affidavits are not proof. Not in any court in the land.

Show us proof.

Did you watch my videos? Why are you ignoring them?
0 ups, 4y
You said; "Tell me how a sworn affidavit is evidence."
Then, I told you.

It's evidence, which you do not like. I'm sorry that democrats got caught.
0 ups, 4y
You claim you watched all the hearings, why are you ignoring all the evidence?
0 ups, 4y,
1 reply
"I am eager to see proof." --- What's stopping you? Go listen to the several days of hearings in front of state representatives then, while you read the sworn affidavits.

It's been there for nearly a month. No excuse to claim that I need to show you when it's been shown, you need to catch up.
1 up, 4y,
1 reply
Hearing in front of state representatives? I've watched them all. Its groups of republicans getting together to talk about how republicans are all upset about the outcome of the legitimate election. Some of them talk about conspiracy theory with ZERO evidence. Some of them talk about video footage that doesn't exist. Some of them talk about dead people voting which is a hoax. Some talk about vans with "Biden" on the side of the van dropping off boxes of ballots which was proven fake as the antonymous "witness" disappeared. But most of them had the Republican representatives calling an end to the hearing because it was outrageously stupid and had ZERO proof or evidence. But you did have that crazy drunk lady that the GoP leaders called unreliable. And don't get me started on Sydney Powell. Its like a f**king circus act and that is what you call PROOF?

Your own GoP leaders threw out the claims at the meetings you are talking about. Prove otherwise. What was the outcome of these meetings? Why would they not share their smoking gun evidence with the courts.

You have fallen victim to the greatest hoax in history and you are so stupid that they actually have yo believing that a meeting held at a hotel or a landscaping company and some signed pieces of paper from anonymous sources are evidence of their claims.

Go look up this term. Borg Drones.

Oh..and did you watch my videos? Here are the links again.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m7oWNVJV37A
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ucxF3nwnj8Y&feature
0 ups, 4y,
1 reply
"Hearing in front of state representatives?" --- Yes. That's what I said. Do you have trouble understanding English?

"I've watched them all." --- Ah, then you have seen evidence but you just rage-out and deny it all. Got it. Such bravery and inspiration.
1 up, 4y,
1 reply
Hearings and affidavits are not proof. Not in any court in the land.

Show us proof.
0 ups, 4y,
1 reply
You're not proof.
Show us the real urmomstoenail.
0 ups, 4y,
1 reply
"not one single piece of proof" --- All the hearings and sworn affidavits prove you wrong.
1 up, 4y,
6 replies
What hearings? Just because a bunch of Republicans gather together to discuss the President's claims does not make any of his claims true. That is not proof. And sworn affidavits mean NOTHING!!! Literally. They are not even admissible in court. I'll sign an affidavit right now saying there was no election fraud.

Do you realize that your smoking gun proof is that there were some meetings and people wrote something on a piece of paper. THAT is your proof?

As I said...not one single piece of proof. Zero evidence. My point is proven 100% once again.

Mic drop.

BTW...watch this.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m7oWNVJV37A
0 ups, 4y,
1 reply
"What hearings?" --- The several days of hearings with state representatives, the ones you claim don't exist, so you can ask that question and also deny evidence.
1 up, 4y,
2 replies
Wow. Meetings. That is some impressive evidence of fraud. What did they do? Did they reenact the fraud? Did they talk about it? Super impressive. What a smoking gun.
0 ups, 4y,
1 reply
"What evidence?"

The evidence in the hearings, and sworn affidavits.
1 up, 4y,
1 reply
Like I said...what evidence?
0 ups, 4y,
1 reply
All of the hearings.
All of the sworn affidavits.
0 ups, 4y
What hearings? What affidavits? What evidence?
0 ups, 4y,
2 replies
You claimed you watched/listened to all the hearings, so why are you asking me, if you already watched/listened to all the hearings?
1 up, 4y,
3 replies
Because the hearings produced less results than you and I arguing here. A bunch of people getting together to complain is not proof.

And why are you avoiding what I said about all those hearings going against tRUMPf and his circus act of a legal team.
0 ups, 4y,
1 reply
"You are the biggest NON-evidence I have ever seen."

Says the commenter that claims they've watched all the hearings yet denies evidence.
1 up, 4y
What evidence?
0 ups, 4y,
1 reply
Hearings of election fraud with state reps

Urmomstoenail: "that's complaining"
1 up, 4y
Hearings? define "hearings" and then tell us what was the outcome of the hearings. You want to prove me wrong? Tell us the outcomes of the "hearings."
0 ups, 4y,
1 reply
Why are you avoiding admitting there's evidence?
1 up, 4y
You are the biggest NON-evidence I have ever seen. After hours and days you have provided nothing.....just like tRUMPf.
24 more days until January 20th. I have never been more proud to be an American. Knowing that people like you will wallow in misery for the next 4 years with your "affidavits, eyewitnesses, and hotel meetings" is sweet and delicious.
0 ups, 4y,
1 reply
0 ups, 4y,
1 reply
"President's claims" --- Americans' claims, eyewitnesses, data analysts, whistleblowers.
1 up, 4y,
2 replies
No eyewitness. ZERO. Literally zero. Prove otherwise.
Data analysts? That's proof? Whistleblowers? What is that? Isn't that the same as witnesses? So some guy comes forward and says, "there was fraud" and that is your evidence? You are pathetic.
0 ups, 4y,
1 reply
"There is nothing to debunk. You have literally presented ZERO evidence."

-- I don't need to, it's already been presented in the hearings and sworn affidavits, which you claim isn't evidence when it's evidence. There's everything to debunk that you have just stated isn't "evidence" when it's evidence, that you just don't like.
1 up, 4y,
1 reply
What hearings?
What affidavits?
Show us.
0 ups, 4y,
1 reply
You know which hearings, all of them.
You know which sworn affidavits, all of them.
Show yourself.
0 ups, 4y
0 ups, 4y,
2 replies
There was eyewitness. Prove otherwise.
Data analysts add to the evidence.
Whistleblowers add to the evidence.
Evidence is evidence. You have not debunked anything. You've only said NO NO NO.
1 up, 4y,
1 reply
There were no eyewitnesses. Zero. Prove otherwise.
Data analysts? Thats your evidence? Did you know that data analysts say that it was the most secure election in US history. So thank you.
Whistleblowers? You don't even know what that means. You are redundant. That is the same a "eyewitnesses" and "affidavits." You have an EXTREMELY low IQ.

And you are 100% correct...evidence is evidence. We finally agree on something.
Now that we agree, show us some evidence.

Hearings and affidavits are not proof. Not in any court in the land.

Show us proof.
0 ups, 4y,
2 replies
There was eyewitness. Prove otherwise.
Data analysts add to the evidence.
Whistleblowers add to the evidence.
Evidence is evidence. You have not debunked anything.
1 up, 4y
There is nothing to debunk. You have literally presented ZERO evidence. You told me there were affidavits and meetings. That is all you did. Some guy on a meme website telling me there are affidavits is not the evidence that I or any court in the land can use to prove that tRUMPf's claims of MASSIVE fraud are real.

And if there were no eyewitnesses, how can I prove that there were no eye witnesses? This really exhibits the tiny intelligence that you have. How do I interview zero people? But if you want to get technical, the fact that there are no eyewitnesses is my proof that there were no eyewitnesses.
But you are claiming there were eyewitnesses.
So who were they?
1 up, 4y,
1 reply
0 ups, 4y,
1 reply
"And sworn affidavits mean NOTHING!!!" --- They do mean something, just not to you because you are defending election/voting fraud.
[deleted]
1 up, 4y,
1 reply
0 ups, 4y,
1 reply
Sworn affidavits means you're scared to review them.
Ah, you could wind up in court if you don't keep your defamation under control.
1 up, 4y
I've reviewed them all.
Hearings and affidavits are not proof. Not in any court in the land.

Show us proof.
0 ups, 4y,
1 reply
"not one single piece of proof. Zero evidence" --- You keep repeating that lie. Evidence is evidence, but I know you can't handle it, so you claim it doesn't exist, so you can defend fraud.
1 up, 4y
ZERO evidence. All you have are stories of witnesses and people who signed papers saying that they witnessed things. So your smoking gun evidence is some lady who said she saw fraud.

You have provided ZERO...literally ZERO evidence. There is none because there was no fraud except that committed by tRUMPf. And I KNOW he committed fraud because there are eye witnesses accounts and sworn affidavits saying so.

Did you watch my videos?
0 ups, 4y,
2 replies
"Hearings? define "hearings""

The hearings that you claimed that you watched. Or did you lie about that too?
1 up, 4y,
2 replies
Did you watch the videos I posted for you? You asked for proof and I have posted these over a dozen times for you yet you ignore them? Why?
They contain raw video from both Fox News and Newsmax, the President's own propaganda network.
Watch them. And in return, I'll watch any video you want me to see.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m7oWNVJV37A
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ucxF3nwnj8Y&feature=emb_logo
0 ups, 4y,
1 reply
Did you lie when you said you watched all the hearings?
1 up, 4y,
1 reply
Watched them all. One was dismissed by the Republican legislators because the "witness was an unreliable source." Another was all about Communists who were paying millions of dollars to the FBI so that they would help a dead Venezuelan dictator assist the Iranians and Chinese to reprogram Dominion voting machines to flip votes from tRUMPf to Biden. tRUMPf fired her and now she is banned from the White House. Then there was one other where an anonymous "WITNESS" who had signed an "AFFIDAVIT" claimed that a van labelled "Biden-Harris-2020" pulled up in broad daylight to unload boxes full of illegal Biden votes. But her identity was never revealed and it seems both her and her testimony have disappeared. Plus there were no other witnesses to this act.

Other than that, all I saw was wither salty crybabies screaming "ITS NOT FAIR" "STOP THE COUNTING" or Republicans saying ENOUGH...Biden won. Get over it.

So if you disagree, show us what you got.
And once again...meetings and affidavits are not evidence or proof.
0 ups, 4y,
1 reply
The hearings, all of them.
The sworn affidavits, all of them.
0 ups, 4y
Show us which hearings. And show us what effect they had.
Affidavits from whom? Who is in possession of them? How were they used? Why are you so afraid to answer?
0 ups, 4y,
1 reply
Retractions of a few of the statements made, doesn't equate to much.
MSM gets away with it daily, but most people can't sue mega corps.
1 up, 4y,
1 reply
What are you talking about? Are you making excuses? Watch the videos.
0 ups, 4y,
1 reply
I watched the videos. Try re-reading the comment if you can't comprehend.
0 ups, 4y
So you understand that both Fox and Newsmax completely debunked you "evidence" theory? Glad to hear it. Its about time.
1 up, 4y,
2 replies
Watched them all. One was dismissed by the Republican legislators because the "witness was an unreliable source." Another was all about Communists who were paying millions of dollars to the FBI so that they would help a dead Venezuelan dictator assist the Iranians and Chinese to reprogram Dominion voting machines to flip votes from tRUMPf to Biden. tRUMPf fired her and now she is banned from the White House. Then there was one other where an anonymous "WITNESS" who had signed an "AFFIDAVIT" claimed that a van labelled "Biden-Harris-2020" pulled up in broad daylight to unload boxes full of illegal Biden votes. But her identity was never revealed and it seems both her and her testimony have disappeared. Plus there were no other witnesses to this act.

Other than that, all I saw was wither salty crybabies screaming "ITS NOT FAIR" "STOP THE COUNTING" or Republicans saying ENOUGH...Biden won. Get over it.

So if you disagree, show us what you got.
And once again...meetings and affidavits are not evidence or proof.
0 ups, 4y,
1 reply
"Instead of telling me that I'm lying, SHOW US how I am lying. Prove it to us. I've asked you about 50 times and instead of putting up evidence, you keep reciting fake news and right wing conspiracy."

Or you could just stop lying. The hearings and sworn affidavits.
0 ups, 4y
What hearings? What affidavits? Show us. And show us who has them, where they came from, what courts, what judges, and what impact they had in overturning a "fraudulent" election.

Still waiting.
0 ups, 4y,
1 reply
"Watched them all." -- Then why are you asking me, "what hearings" and "what evidence" ?
0 ups, 4y,
2 replies
Because I want to know what hearings you are referring to because none of the gatherings ever showed any evidence. Prove otherwise.

Did you watch my videos?
0 ups, 4y,
1 reply
You know which hearings, all of them.
You know which sworn affidavits, all of them.
You haven't proven anything but that you're in extreme denial and dodging the evidence.
I watched the videos, that you posted, those weren't "your" videos.
0 ups, 4y
All of what? Show us. The rest of the planet Earth has not seen these hearings of affidavits of which you speak. Not even tRUMPf supporters.
0 ups, 4y,
1 reply
"none of the gatherings ever showed any evidence." -- You're lying, you can't stop lying, and you know you're lying. I wonder who believes you.
0 ups, 4y
Instead of telling me that I'm lying, SHOW US how I am lying. Prove it to us. I've asked you about 50 times and instead of putting up evidence, you keep reciting fake news and right wing conspiracy.

NONE of the gatherings ever produced and evidence. Prove us wrong. Tell us what evidence Guiliani, Powell, or crazy drunk lady presented.

if you want me to shut up, you have to show us. Otherwise I am telling 100% the truth and you are just too salty to acknowledge it because saving face is more important to you than truth.

I am STILL waiting.
1 up, 4y
And this
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ucxF3nwnj8Y&feature
1 up, 4y,
1 reply
Your comment has nothing to do with the meme posted that is in reference to her listening to the hearings all day then claiming she's seen no evidence, even though they played video evidence.
1 up, 4y,
1 reply
There is no evidence. There is no video evidence. ZERO.
0 ups, 4y,
1 reply
"There is no evidence. There is no video evidence. ZERO." --- Keep lying, but to yourself. Keep your lies to yourself.
[deleted]
1 up, 4y,
3 replies
0 ups, 4y
"You think I am going to allow a group of seditious traitors spread lies, hatred, and division based on the lies of the greatest enemy the US" --- Democrats?

You haven't stopped them. What makes you think you can disallow anything?
0 ups, 4y,
1 reply
"There is ZERO proof." -- There is. Hearings and sworn affidavits, you just keep claiming that's not evidence.

"And you have provided zero proof." --- It's not mine, it's theirs, I just have the manhood to review it, unlike you.
1 up, 4y
Hearings and affidavits are not proof. Not in any court in the land.

Show us proof.
0 ups, 4y,
1 reply
"Showing me Democrats and their lawyers preparing for big court cases would be proof." --- Bias. You're saying that evidence is only evidence when Democrats prepare it. Got it. Ironic calling me a seditious liar.
1 up, 4y
Hearings and affidavits are not proof. Not in any court in the land.

Show us proof.
Created with the Imgflip Meme Generator
IMAGE DESCRIPTION:
DOESN'T MATTER IF I'VE HEARD EVIDENCE ALL DAY AND HAD THE CHANCE TO QUESTION WITNESSES; CNN TOLD ME THAT BILL BARR SAID 'NO EVIDENCE', SO I'M GOING TO BELIEVE THAT