remarkable, no liez detected

Makes sense. Ecosystems can't function without the smallest creatures (incomes) maintaining everything.

The U.S. needs to put this on their fridge, because it gets an A+

Sure, it's easy for an armchair SJW like you to sit behind your monitor and puke out crap on your keyboard about what's useless /. essential and what isn't, but to the owner of a small business like a nail salon, maybe they consider feeding their family and paying their mortgage to be essential.

But you and your CCP overlords who control the Democrat party, don't care about people enough to consider that, do you?

Face masks are extremely easy to use and essentially free ($5).

If you don’t support their widespread use, you’re in no position to weigh any other economic aspect of the pandemic.

As is typical of you, KF, you didn't address the point I made, but instead you deflected with some bullshit about masks.

Your tactics are as ineffective as they are transparent.

I have stated time and again here on imgflip that I'm not against wearing masks, and in fact, I am in favor of wearing masks. I live in the bay area of freakin' Taxifornia for dawgs sake, and I'm wearing a mask as I type this!

It's too bad that you can't stay on point so that we could have a serious conversation.

Heck, even Trump is able to offer a bromide that seems to support the use of face masks every once in awhile. However, he’s offered plenty of sarcastic comments about face masks cutting the other way, and downplaying the pandemic in general, and so have you.

A garbed, inconsistent message may as well not be one at all. Trolls seize on the slightest inconsistency as evidence of hypocrisy. Except when it comes to the Donald, of course: he’s given a free pass on this as well as any number of other terrible things he’s done.

There’s also a gulf of difference between being generally “in favor of wearing masks” and supporting mask mandates.

Do you support the latter?

- Your meme wasn't about face masks
- My first reply wasn't about face masks.
- My second reply was about face masks only because you mentioned them and I wanted to point out that I'm not against them, as your reply seemed to indicate.
- I've said nothing about Trump in this thread

I have not downplayed the pandemic. I've pointed out to you many times, and others here on the flip many times, that if we had to do it all over again, that imo, and I think the *science* supports this, all we needed to do (and now need to do) is wear face masks, wash our hands frequently, enforce social distancing, and isolate those in the most vulnerable groups, such as seniors. We certainly don't need to be sending people infected with covid into senior facilities as the left's darling Gov. Cuomo did, which resulted in thousands of deaths.

There is no science that supports lockdowns as a viable tactic to combat the virus. Please show me the "science" that supports lockdowns, assuming you believe they are effective.

So tell me again, how I'm downplaying the pandemic?

All I said was "t's easy for an armchair SJW like you to sit behind your monitor and puke out crap on your keyboard about what's useless /. essential and what isn't, but to the owner of a small business like a nail salon, maybe they consider feeding their family and paying their mortgage to be essential."

YOU DID NOT ADDRESS THAT COMMENT, which was the main point of my first reply.

The sheriff of Riverside county also said it quite nicely when he stated that to the person who has a job, it's essential.

As usual KF, you're deflecting. Try to be serious, mmmkay?

I would criticize you for not responding, KF, but I know how busy you are cranking out memes with false information about Trump... and of course, I'm pretty lazy sometimes and don't reply when I could. But still, you were so far off point and so fully in deflection mode, that I just have to believe that even you knew you were wrong. Oh well, it doesn't matter.