politics

I upvoted this so hard. Thank you.

That actually is highly probable if those were all mail-in ballots. Given that Trump said mail-in ballots were a scam very early this year, it makes perfect sense for an overwhelming majority to be for Biden.

No, the speed that they where counted is not physically possible. Also the screw is far greater than the mail-in ballots being vast majority going to Biden and is instead over 99% for Biden.

It is if it was done by machine. Was there not a hand recount to reaffirm this?

What if it wasn't done by the machines? Plugging a zip drive is how votes are updated allowing for both human error and maleficence to interfere with the votes.

It seems that votes where somehow counted and feed in all at once in physically impossible numbers with a statistically improvable screw in one direction. Combine that with things like curing being done in back rooms without supervision and you get red flags that something bad happened, but could mean they report ballots all at once if they failed to follow protocol.

If you want to go conspiracy theory level, huge pallet drops of unverified votes nearly all for Biden where accused of happening the day of the election by poll watchers.

Again, was there not a hand recount to reaffirm this?

Well not the possibility of ballots being fraudulent and entered in all at once. You'd need an audit to do that.

And have Trump’s lawyers not brought these concerns before the state Supreme Court?

A hand recount just confirms what we already know what the count for each candidate is....no one is doubting that but rather fraud. Hand counting does not eliminate what is being claimed ...FRAUD!....such as late ballots, false ballots, dead people voting, the lack of verified signatures, and when envelopes are separated from its content.

Lack of evidence is not evidence.

Nor is it really a "lack of evidence" if you just do not have the knowledge or skillset to find it.

It is a lack of evidence if the state protocols were followed and no one contest that.

My skillset, or your accusation my lack thereof, hardly matters. It seems a majority of these claims have already been dismissed in court and simply crying corruption after fraud does little to make a convincing argument.

But perhaps it is you who lacks that skillset to do so.

I am not talking about your skillset....That should be obvious as you have nothing to do with counting or evaluating the votes. And some court cases have been dismissed because as yet there is simply no evidence to satisfy the court. To get that evidence will take months....and a full audit. Something that is not likely to happen.

Seeing that Drstrange love has stopped me from replying to him...I will just think aloud to myself. No! Most of what you are regurgitating is just media vomit....you have just swallowed it and regurgitating it again. Among those is this that you had typed "There may be hundreds of ballots dismissed but not the thousands required to flip the state." You could not possibly know that unless you are god...and you most certainly are not. But I do agree that it is too late to do anything now....unless Trump's team comes up with hard evidence and that I do not see them doing in such a short time frame. Also, they conservatives do not have to use this to impeach Trump (not that they can as they do not control the House but they will in 2022....at which time they will impeach him for his corrupt dealing with Ukraine that he had boasted about (it is on taped record). And then also for his son's dealing with Ukraine, China, Russia, Romania, and Kazahkstan.....in which he was the "big guy" getting the 10% bribe. It should be fun....the Conservatives are if nothing else....very patient.

No, it will not take months.

The best that can happen is that the state finds protocols were not followed in the counting of ballots. The people in charge will be fined or jailed for a few short months. The issues presented in this election will be used to forge new legislation in an effort to not repeat them. The ballots will never be verified because the time to do so has passed. There may be hundreds of ballots dismissed but not the thousands required to flip the state.

Biden will be President and there will not be any way to use this to invalidate the results or otherwise impeach him.

As someone whose spent years mulling over the Mueller Report and the Impeachment over the Ukraine phone call, I knew full well that a Republican Senate would do nothing to convict Trump. And while Republicans still have the Senate, they can’t even bring an investigation against Biden without enough of the House to do so. Not until 2022.

In that case, that is the best we can get to the age old Trump mantra of “Wait and see.” Personally, I’ll be getting off here and will wait when there is actually something to accuse Biden of rather than playing political games like children.

Much like Santa Claus, the Silent Majority does not exist. Nor does the Deep State.

Maybe, and sure I would go for the large majority but just 3000 votes out of almost 600,000 votes is just not possible.

When you eliminate the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth.

Not really...being unable to explain the improbable....does not mean that improbability is the truth. And how exactly do you eliminate the "impossible" after all it is "impossible"

That’s not what that means. It is a line from Sir Arthur Conan Doyle and is one famously attributed to deduction. Erroneously or otherwise though it may be with how his fictional character, Sherlock Holmes, often arrived to his conclusions. He basically guessed.

But what it means is that though you cannot explain a thing, doesn’t mean it cannot be explained. Even if you do not have all the facts, what facts you do have matter and your conclusions cannot be detrimental to the known fact even if you do not yet understand the result.

Doyle's explanation and conclusions are his.....mine is mine. And Doyle had created fake crimes in his imagination for which he had already solved beforehand, also in his imagination. And his imagination had wandered so far as to fabricate "The lost World" that was based on the Roraima Mountain plateau which is on the border of Guyana, Venezuela, and Brazil. Quite an imagination I must admit....but all imaginary....like the Russian Collusion Delusion....Even Doyle would have been impressed by that one. So there you go.

To quote someone else who was a little less biased in regards to whether or not there was a Russian Collusion "Delusion", a term that was popularized by obviously biased media...

"If we had confidence in the thorough investigation of the facts that the President did not commit obstruction of justice, we would so state based on the facts and applicable legal standards however, we are unable to reach that judgement" - Robert Mueller.

My point was, when you manipulate the numbers by isolating them to a liberal county and by a singular method with which a Republican President had spent the better part of the year publicly discouraging, it is only natural you'd see a higher than normal percentage of Democratic votes from that particular county and from that particular method. Much as one might isolate a few quotes to conclude there was "no collusion" and that the Mueller Report "completely and totally exonerates" Trump. It is not impossible for that to happen, not improbable, nor is it unreasonable even if you are in doubt. Just because you ignore the facts, doesn't mean they cease to exist.

That did not happen in one county alone....but many....this was just one of the most obvious ones. And I did no manipulation....this is just raw data and facts are facts.....facts do not lie. And as for your Russian Collusion delusion Delusion....and unbiased....Robert Mueller may be a Republican but there are never-Trumpers Republicans who absolutely hate Trump because they believe that he is not a Conservative but rather a demonrat. And Robert had over 2 years to find the evidence of collusion, backed by 18 very angry democrat lawyers, and over 40 million USD, and the demonrat Congress, and he failed to deliver. This was just like how Brenner, Strzok, Pencil Necked Schumer, and many other demonrats had claimed for 3 years that they had seen concrete evidence.....but it was worse than simply lacking when all was said and done. Muller's statement is just bitter and he was an angry broken man at the end of that investigation....it is like a convict being sentenced to jail for life for killing someone and screaming all of the way as he was dragged off to rot in jail "Your Honour, I did not do it." Futile! Impotent! Useless! Desperate!

[1]
Let me break this down a little because there is a lot to consume here.

"That did not happen in one county alone....but many...."

Correct. As has been explained, liberal counties will tend to vote Democratic and Democrats were more likely to favor mail-in votes than Republicans due to Trump's insistance that they are unreliable. It was a self-fulfilling prophecy that Trump voters would, as a result, be very unlikely to utilize it as a way to vote.

"And I did no manipulation..."

But there is manipulation. I'm not accusing you of rigging the data to your biased conclusion.
I'm merely stating a fact that these numbers are manipulated based on that county and way they voted. In that county, which you did not name so I did a search and the article quoting Waldren's exclamation that this was impossible was in regards to data processing, not the data itself. He even says that this is not evidence of fraud in and of itself.

"this is just raw data and facts are facts.....facts do not lie."

No, but facts can be manipulated.

" And as for your Russian Collusion delusion Delusion....and unbiased....Robert Mueller may be a Republican but there are never-Trumpers Republicans who absolutely hate Trump because they believe that he is not a Conservative but rather a demonrat."

I would refrain from using such an obviously biased term as demonrat. Perhaps it was a slip of the finger. It is true that Trump has a liberal background and Democrat friends. Including the Clintons. It is also true he's made unprecedented political measures that test the limits of the federal governments extension. Usually for personal or political gain.

"And Robert had over 2 years to find the evidence of collusion, backed by 18 very angry democrat lawyers, and over 40 million USD, and the demonrat Congress, and he failed to deliver."

He delivered a 200 page report. Apparently very few Republicans actually read it.

[2]
"This was just like how Brenner, Strzok, Pencil Necked Schumer,"

Again, if you wish to be taken seriously, I would refrain from the namecalling.

"and many other demonrats had claimed for 3 years that they had seen concrete evidence.....but it was worse than simply lacking when all was said and done."

I would not call a 448 page (not 200, excuse me.) report with 99 criminal charges, 37 indictments or guilty pleas, and 5 prison sentences as lacking.

"Muller's statement is just bitter and he was an angry broken man at the end of that investigation...."

No, Mueller's statement was based on the fact that his report had been misrepresented in it's summary and in Trump's tweets. Essentially, Barr and Trump lied to the American people and Mueller called them out on it.

"it is like a convict being sentenced to jail for life for killing someone and screaming all of the way as he was dragged off to rot in jail"

It was more like a man who had built up a repretation of being honest and unbiased despite his political leanings, only to be harassed long after he concluded his report. Then, have his hard work be made light of, made political, and then ignored.

"Your Honour, I did not do it." Futile! Impotent! Useless! Desperate!"

It is best to keep your fantasies to yourself.

Sigh! 99 criminal charges that were created in the mind of unimaginative democrats just like how Doyle had created his crimes in his mind...all imaginary. All toothless ludicrous charges made without any evidence. eg "Trump does not have dogs in the White House and we are alleging without evidence that he had talked to Putin. Therefore, he is both a dog hater and a Ruskie lover....Make that Charge # 1." And it only got worse from there because that was the demonrats' strongest charge. If any of those 99 charges had even the most infinitesimal and pathetic merit....then the rabid and hate-filled demonrat-controlled congress, backed by Trump-hating Muller, 18 crazy angry democrat lawyers (how bigoted was that), over 40 MILLION wasted USDs, and more than ample time of over 2+ years would have gotten him. That it did not happen and that Trump came out smelling of peaches and roses.....means that the man must the most honest politician in the entire world. And another politician under that intense scrutiny would have absolutely failed.

I take it you did not read the Mueller Report either.

https://www.justice.gov/storage/report.pdf

This means that biden received over 99.44 % of those votes and those are better results than Sadam Hussein at the height of his power when he had personally signed his name on every single ballot.....but had allowed his own inner circle and family to vote freely, some of whom had then voted against him. And why are libbies complaining that Trump has not conceded? Hillary grudgingly conceded and then went on to complain for the next 4 years during which there was a fake impeachment attempt, riots, burning, looting, and vicious deaths. And that lady, who is not a lady, from Georgia....that absolutely awful Stacey Abrams who had never conceded, although she was beaten by over 50,000 votes....and the liberal media had fully supported her.

Just commenting on the maths.

I'll admit that I'm not a maths professor, but just with secondary school maths, something that doesn't seem to come up when people talk about statistical probability is that these are calculated using random samples. E.g. if you have 3 marbles in a bag, one white, one black and one green and you pick one out blindfolded, you have a 1 in 3 chance of picking a particular color.

If you asked 1000 people at a Democrat convention who they would vote for and all 1000 said Biden; or if you asked 1000 people at a Republican convention and they all said Trump; would you say that either of these were fraudulent because it's statistically impossible to not get a single vote? No, because neither is a random sample. They are both biased samples.

If you look at how many times Trump negatively commented on mail-in votes, it would be disingenuous to say that mail-in votes would be a random sample.

Given how hard Trump spoke against mail-in voting, the statistical anomaly would not be how few were for Trump, but how many he got. After all, if 100% of people who were voting for Trump believed that mail-in votes were not safe, then a 0% mail-in vote for Trump could be expected, given the bias of the sample. It would not need to be fraud, it would just mean that people who voted for him believed what he said.

Everyone is entitled to their opinion, but if you want to use maths and talk statistics, can we please at least acknowledge the difference between random samples and non-random samples.

Yeah! I did some statistics and the first thing that I had learned was "There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies, and statistics." (Mark Twain). And it is a phrase describing the persuasive power of numbers, particularly the use of statistics to bolster weak arguments

But aren't you using statistics to say that what happened was 'impossible'?

No....I am just saying that a dump of about 600,000 votes and one candidate receiving just 3000 of that vote is impossible.....not improbable but impossible. If you want to categorize that then it is just basic maths....no stats required.

I don't think you understand the difference between impossible and improbable.

Impossible - not able to occur, exist, or be done.

Improbable - not likely to be true or to happen.

If I may point out the flaw in your logic in laymen terms.

You believe it is impossible for someone to achieve 99.44%, when in actuality a person can achieve 100% of the votes. Is it common? No. Is it likely? Yes. Is it very very unlikely? Yes. Therefore, it is not impossible. To explain further, it is impossible for Biden to receive 100.44% of the votes. There is no scenario, no matter how slim, that he can achieve more of a percentage than the total votes. That is impossible.

So, it would be more accurate to say it is improbable, no matter how small a chance Biden would've had to achieve near 99.9% of the vote. Is it suspect? Absolutely. But once you realize that the parameters of it being a liberal county and those numbers being exclusive to mail-in votes, then that probability of him achieving 99.44% becomes more probable.

But he did receive more than 100% of the votes.....more votes were cast in PA than there are voters....So it is simply not impossible when you cheat. When you cheat then the impossible becomes possible.

No, that is an entirely separate claim that has nothing to do with the irregular voter dumps. You're getting your facts mixed up. And even that claim was proven wrong.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2020/11/08/fact-check-post-argues-states-have-more-votes-than-voters/6191399002/

It is entirely possible for Biden to get 99.44% of the mail-in ballots of a liberal county.

Sni**er! Fact-checked by the democrat media....good grief...I am simply overwhelmed by your evidence....and your trust in the American media which barely drags itself in at around the 30th spot in worldwide media trust.....even far below the Canadian media which is paid for and sponsored by the Canadian Liberal Party and acts as their propaganda arm, should tell you a lot. Which makes you a very smart person I guess. But I have other things to do now and will leave you be....You obviously do not have to work for a living....That must be great.

USAToday is hardly liberal media. Take a look here...
https://www.allsides.com/media-bias/media-bias-chart

You would rather trust the Republican Party (I.E. the government) rather than the media?

Also, retirement is great.

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/usa-today-2/....No it is leftist......here is a non-bias check, unlike yours. And until tomorrow.

Best to read the actual thing you sent.

"Overall, we rate USA Today Left-Center Biased based on editorial positions that slightly favor the left. We also rate them High for factual reporting due to proper sourcing and a clean news reporting fact check record."

A rather glowing positive review, despite it's minor left-leaning bias. Which appears to only be in regards to Donald Trump. That doesn't dispute it's ability to factcheck, however.

https://hereistheevidence.com/

https://coalregioncanary.com/2020/11/26/pennsylvania-election-mail-in-vote-spikes-expert-testifies-senate-hearing-gettysburg/

This appears to be a more detailed version of your meme's topic, so lets go over this again with full context.

Already, Col. Waldren here is on shaky ground as, like you, he is using the word impossible but according to his testimony, he is under the impression that the time it took to process this number of votes, by the machine, was impossible as it exceeded the machine's capacity and ability. Which, if this is true, then he is CORRECT to use it here, but that doesn't mean it is impossible for Biden to have won 99.44% of the mail-in ballots in one dump. It is impossible for a machine to process faster than it's ability. If it did, in fact, do this.

In the abysmal interview with Giuliani, Waldren explains further that a big spike is a "prime indicator of fraudulent voting." But a few seconds before that Waldren explains that he and his team understand the spikes not as evidence of fraud in and of themselves, but as red flags: "These spike anomalies in this chart really show where for us to look forensically to actually determine what happened with these votes." And a few seconds before that (at 1:28:00), he says, "Really only a detailed forensic analysis of the actual machines and software will truly show how many Pennsylvania citizens have had their civil rights violated."

Here let me give you another one that is not the imaginary Doyle's data that was just posted. https://spectator.org/legitimacy-of-biden-win-buried-by-objective-data/ Here is some of what is stated inside....."Meanwhile, no discussion of 2020 election skulduggery is complete without a discussion of the Democrat precincts that record more votes than registered voters. Rep. Bill Posey (R-Fla.) tweeted the following on that perennial topic: “According to an affidavit in the MI lawsuit, one Michigan precinct/township had 781.91% turnout. How does this happen?”

Good question. No fewer than six precincts listed by Rep. Posey experienced turnout exceeding 120 percent. Another 10 allegedly enjoyed 100 percent turnout. This is an insult to the electorate’s intelligence, and it happened in Democrat precincts all across the nation."

I'm not sure where that affidavit is getting it's numbers. That would actually be a better question. Here are Michigan's actual voter turn out results by precinct.

https://www.co.muskegon.mi.us/DocumentCenter/View/10303/2020-11-03_Cumulative_Results?bidId=

Everything appears to be in order. Another false claim rendered moot.

Sni**er....so says the brain-washed demonrat before the evidence is evaluated or judged upon. I believe that they call that making a bigoted judgment in advance.

No, I believe it's called prejudice. Which, even that is incorrect. Again, I'm not sure where that affidavit is getting it's numbers. The burden of proof is on you, therefor until proof can be found, then I cannot make a judgment on it. A phrase, I'm sure, most of Trump's attorneys have heard from judges all too often in the last few weeks.

Can you even prove this happened? I doubt it.

Oh, we know that it had happened....meaning the dumps....but to prove that it was fraud would be difficult before December 14th. All you have was that almost 600,000 votes were dumped over a short period of time and Trump received just over 3000 of those votes which is impossible.

Why is it impossible?