influence peddling and the fake news

67

Credible evidence holds up in court.

thank you, Capt Obvious

You say that, but it doesn't seem to be obvious enough to you?

[image deleted]

Is that interview court admissible?

Then what's the point in harping on about it? It's legally useless.

Make it very clear to the judge that he's talking out of his ass. That'll really sort this all out.

now you're just being stupid - pls f**k off

No

67

33 and a third

Interviews aren't evidence.

They are when the same testimony is given in court.
You haven't seen the interview either, so you too are talking out your ass