This is true

Ah! Yes! The long con! By not cheating this time, they've gained the trust and ruling of the courts so that NEXT time their cheats will go unquestioned.

It's so ridiculously over-complicated, it just might work!

Yes. If they get away with this, there will be no standard for it ever again. I’m not just worried over this election, it’s all the future ones with it.

The standard is "you need proof" and still will be.

The only problem is Democrats throw out proof and say it’s fake news.

If you bring up speculation, “It’s only speculation. You need proof!”
If you bring up proof, “It’s fake news! You need proof!”

Ah, yes. Because if anyone is calling news "fake news", it's the Democrats. Not the president, who has claimed that multiple different news networks are fake, definitely the Democrats.

Well, first of all - yes, if you bring up speculation, a judge will tell you that's not admissable as evidence. In fact, a lot of the talking points that were pushed right here on imgflip were straight up ruled as hearsay, and did not see any court time at all.

If you bring up actual "proof" or evidence, NO COURT will declare it fake news, and no court has. If you have even half decent lawyers (which, frankly, for Trump, isn't always the case) the court will at least evaluate and assess the weight of your proof on the bearing on the case.

Your proof will be nullified if the court rules against you - but that doesn't mean you won't be allowed to catch future cheating efforts in a different election with different evidence, or even in the same election with different evidence. It just means that THAT PARTICULAR INSTANCE of your "proof" didn't wash.

So cut the crap. If you can prove it, prove it to a judge, and stop complaining that you can't prove it to your relatives in a Facebook argument because that's not how things like this are settled anyway.

Are you stupid? The Democratic Party is far from Marxist. Hell, they aren't even progressive.

They call themselves progressive (although I think they mean “sinful” by that, because the only “progression” going on in that party is increase in conscienceless transgression). And the government runs finances in both systems. Democrats once even took away a man’s home (against his will) and made it into a business place for themselves a while ago (which isn’t far from communism, considering the government controlling finances). Controlling land is just he government owning all property, which is essentially communism.