Imgflip Logo Icon

In Today's News

In Today's News | WE MUST START COLLECTING INFORMATION AND THE NAMES OF TRUMP SUPPOTERS; AOC - NOVEMBER 2020; I LIKE THIS IDEA... | image tagged in ocasio-cortez super genius,smile hitler,election 2020 | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
6,923 views 173 upvotes Made by GOwell 4 years ago in politics
233 Comments
11 ups, 4y,
1 reply
Stalin says | TO THE GULAG YOU GO | image tagged in stalin says | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
9 ups, 4y,
1 reply
laughing hitler | Perfect voter suppression, Democrats! | image tagged in laughing hitler | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
1 up, 4y
made w/ Imgflip meme maker
Be AFRAID. Be berry berry AFRAID.
F**k YOU, Adolph. The GOP
King of What You "Speak".
eFF~dard. The Inner Ned Hates You.
and the Inner Ned practices
"Drunken Hurricane Style" KungF**KINGfu,
baaaayyyy~beeee!!
[deleted]
12 ups, 4y,
3 replies
2 ups, 4y,
1 reply
what about jews on the left? are you saying that liberal jews are aligned with hitler?
1 up, 4y,
1 reply
If a Jew is on the left, they don’t know much about politics. The left could care less about Jews. Obama did a nuclear deal with the epitome of an anti-Semite country, while Trump took the strongest stance for Jews by putting their embassy in Jerusalem.
1 up, 4y,
1 reply
We don't want to support someone who panders to nazis and says that we rob the working class. You know the one who called us brutal killers. And not all jews affiliate with Israel
0 ups, 4y,
1 reply
Who exactly panders to nazis? Who called Jews brutal killers?
Well, that’s sad. God will turn His attention to Israel again one day.
1 up, 4y
Trump did! TRUMP F**KING DID! He said "You're brutal killers, not nice people at all but you have to vote for me."
[deleted]
3 ups, 4y,
2 replies
Did you just say Adolf hitler is a liberal
9 ups, 4y,
3 replies
He was a leftist.
2 ups, 4y,
1 reply
1 up, 4y
LOL ikr
[deleted]
0 ups, 4y,
1 reply
and don't bring up "Oh BuT hE wAs A sOcIaLiSt BcUz In ThE nAmE".
1 up, 4y,
1 reply
No. He was exactly like Zedong, who was a straight up communist. The only difference between him and Zedong is he wanted to conquer others. But growing up under their leadership was the exact same. (I read lots of auto-biographies, just so you know)
[deleted]
0 ups, 4y,
1 reply
can you actually cite sources for once? and yes, of course it was similar to zedong. both were totalitarian.
1 up, 4y,
1 reply
Well, two of the auto-biographies I’ve read are Red Scarf Girl and Parallel Journeys. They both start with total control systems that make kids happy because they support equality, so the people who view themselves as less important feel good. But in the end, life is harder for everyone. Matter of fact, a teacher reiterated this system for an experiment in the 1960s and accidentally created a communist-like system in his school & had to end it because of how people were acting.
The same applies to the left. Everyone is equal, but at what cost? The more you have people deciding everyone is equal, the more control they have to have over everything, and people are often too corrupt to have that kind of power. If we continue this path, it won’t be good for us.
[deleted]
0 ups, 4y,
1 reply
good point, but i think that that applies to the right too. the point of conservatism is to preserve tradition, right? but i think that goes too far too. why do we have to be anti-porn and anti-weed, that doesn't seem very "SmAlL gUbErMeNt" to me, that seems like infringing on rights. sure, you want a small government, but what's even the point of that if you want strong military, borders, and police?
1 up, 4y,
2 replies
It’s not only to preserve tradition. That’s a leftist misinterpretation that I think people probably coined to get democrats to look on them like they’re those “boring old-schoolers”. I am a conservative, but I always love new ideas and love modern innovation.

Porn isn’t illegal with a Republican in the White House. I don’t know if we should illegalize it, but here’s the thing. If you want to have a good relationship built on love, porn isn’t a good idea. If you’ve seen #WalkAway videos (and I highly encourage you do) the guy who started that whole movement is a gay guy who wants Democrats to know that Republicans are completely fine with having gays, blacks, hispanics, Muslims, etc. w/ them. He has a very interesting story, and he hasn’t been conservative for a long time (he voted for Hillary in ‘16). (I am religious, so I don’t think porn or LGBTQ+ is right, but I won’t stop talking to people or begin hating people, because Jesus told us to not hate anybody, and I think a lot of Christians forget that.)

He watched a video claiming to prove Trump wasn’t mocking the disabled reporter, and just saw it out of curiosity. It showed that what he did to mock the guy is exactly what he does to mock people that are lying. It showed this pattern has been ongoing for the last 10 years. He was surprised by this, but when he mentioned it to his liberal friends, no one wanted to hear it. So he wondered, “Have I been like this?” I’d encourage you to watch his story, and a few others on them.

I don’t know what weed is.

Military protects the country from enemies (and could be the reason WWIII hasn’t started yet). Borders protect the country from enemies and illegal immigrants. Police protect the people from crime. If you’re against police, you’re supporting people’s rights to commit crimes. I know the media will try to say it’s infringing upon rights, but it’s done to protect us. If we defund the police, the crime rate will shoot up immensely. In E St Louis, once the government decided to quit serving the city because too many people were worried that their lives were in danger. And soon the city was polluted (nobody picked up the trash), and crime got worse (no police were around). There have been cities already where they defunded the police, and crime rose, and they had to return them.
[deleted]
1 up, 4y,
1 reply
but a strong military makes strong violence. we need to be as pacifist as possible. weed means marijauna and technically, conservatism is about preservation of tradition. i know that the republican party and conservatives theselves aren't anti-LGBT but many of their members are.
0 ups, 4y
Pacifist is how a nation gets overthrown. I’m sorry, but I don’t think that’s right. Plus, it’s not like the military is in our face listening to every word we say and suppressing our freedom like in communist countries. If the military is leaving us alone to live our lives freely and safely, I don’t think we should be against them. If our military was like the KGB, (a communist idea, by the way) I would be 100% against them.
Marijuana is freedom? I think making that illegal is like parents protecting their children from foolish things. Marijuana is harmful to you long and short term. Drinking and all that. Conservatives won’t make it illegal as far as I know, but it shouldn’t be done. It’s like slow suicide. Have you seen the side effects of it? I’m a probability nerd and get very afraid of health sometimes, so things like that are not good for me, but are people really wanting to take those chances? Heroin should simply be illegalized. It makes people violent and has a page worth of ridiculous side-effects no human should want. The people that sell these things know what they’re doing and they should be put out of business because they don’t give a jolly rip about anyone they’re selling to.
First, anti-LGBTQ+ doesn’t mean you hate LGBTQ+ people; it means you don’t believe it’s right. Second, pretty much the conservatives that are anti-LGBTQ+ are the religious ones.
And preservation of tradition is a very one-sided view of conservatism. I don’t know where it came from, but it isn’t really accurate. If it were accurate, I don’t think conservatives would have been for black peoples’ freedom and right to vote, or women’s right to vote. I don’t think Trump would have signed a law to help historically black colleges, and I don’t think conservatives would like all the innovation going on in the country right now.
I once saw a definition of conservative on the Urban Dictionary (yes, the UD), that said “We would have flying cars by now if conservatives weren’t afraid of change.” Well, I’ve never seen conservatives openly speak against technology. We love it just as much as everyone else does, and help further it just as much as everyone else does.
I’ve said this before, I am not an old-school person. The newer and better an idea is, the more I’ll like it (unless I believe it’s morally wrong). And I am a staunch conservative. We’re not all boring old-schoolers.
[deleted]
0 ups, 4y,
1 reply
i know what it means, but they want to illegalize same-sex marriage. that goes against the point of our country. if all men are created equal, then we should give everyone equal right to marry, regardless of their sexuality..
0 ups, 4y
Technically many on the right don’t want that. And if Trump wanted it, he’d probably have done it by now.
[deleted]
0 ups, 4y,
2 replies
lol, whatever you want to tell yourself. i'm not sure he's a rightist either however, possibly just a super authoritarian guy.
0 ups, 4y
The Nazis were syncratists, meaning they took ideas from both the left and the right. Mostly bad ideas.
0 ups, 4y,
2 replies
There is no way he was rightist. If anyone suggests that, they’re either ignorant or being insulting. The right isn’t about government control (something he was ridiculously extreme about). The left has financial government control and government control in its plans.
[deleted]
1 up, 4y,
1 reply
just look up pinochet. he was an ultra-capitalist, ultra-anti-leftist, who threw leftists off helicopters, and guess what, the government controlled a lot of stuff.
0 ups, 4y,
1 reply
Yes, but he wasn’t rightist and rightists don’t defend or affiliate with him.
[deleted]
0 ups, 4y,
1 reply
yes, he was rightist. capitalism is rightist, and he was very capitalist.
0 ups, 4y,
2 replies
So I looked him up, and i don’t think his beliefs all matched up with the right or capitalism. He might have identified as such, but dictatorship among other things he did are definitely not rightist.
[deleted]
0 ups, 4y,
1 reply
it's not in the slightest bit contradictory.
0 ups, 4y
How not? The right openly claims to be against dictatorship. The right depends on the Constitution, which doesn’t want kingship. “No more kings” was what we were founded upon. And “no more kings” is what the right wants.
[deleted]
0 ups, 4y,
1 reply
so you're saying there can't be a right-wing dictator?
0 ups, 4y
I’m saying that dictatorship is against what the right stands for, so you can have some rightist mentalities and be like that, but that entire framework of thinking is anti-rightist. To be honest, conservative mindsets are about getting the population successful without needing the help of the government. So dictatorship is completely useless in that arena. Leaders don’t control finances or lives. Thus, it’s kinda contradictory.
[deleted]
0 ups, 4y,
1 reply
so you're saying authoritarianism is only leftist? you're really ignorant aren't you.
1 up, 4y,
1 reply
Total authority (basically playing God) is communism, which is the same as the radical left. They control what you get, what you say, etc.
One thing that confuses me about the left is they have all these branches of terminology and act like one minor difference is the biggest thing in the world.
[deleted]
1 up, 4y,
1 reply
there are many schools of anarchist thought that are left-wing, i'm confused how you want to abolish political authority and want total authority at the same time. don't act like all totalitarian dictators who commited mass genocides were leftist
1 up, 4y
I don’t want total authority. I actually want the lowest amount authority that will keep us safe.
Well, no one who wants to grow business and let everyone prosper is going to be committing mass genocides unless they contradict themselves. But people who want to run everything financially, those are the people that can commit them because they’re in total control and have no responsibility to anyone. And that’s what I don’t like.
8 ups, 4y,
1 reply
Hitler was a Socialist, that’s a fact. So yes he was a leftist.
3 ups, 4y,
2 replies
Socialism is a broad term, while Hitler was a 'Socialist, if you're thinking of Soviet socialism, you're wrong. The main aspect of socialism is that the government handles all production and distribution. However, in Nazi Germany although there were some regulations made by the government, the private still existed. Also, Hitler spoke of himself as a 'Revolutionary against the socialist revolution'. So you can take it from the man himself that he wasn't a leftist.
9 ups, 4y,
3 replies
He was a socialist they all supplant the individual for the state. Hitlers Policies were were very leftist. State sponsored vacation a “people’s car” etc. maybe read the history instead of just look at pictures
[deleted]
3 ups, 4y
Truth!! Upvote ++++++++++
[deleted]
1 up, 4y,
2 replies
lol, can you please actually quote sources instead spouting absolute bullshit?
2 ups, 4y
This is history and facts not emotion based on your feels. That is what’s absolute bullshit.
2 ups, 4y,
1 reply
What need for source that’s what they are. You can look it up to verify the Nazi party stands for National Socialist and the others
[deleted]
0 ups, 4y,
1 reply
i'm completely aware of the name, but names aren't everything. north korea calls itself a democratic republic. is that true?
2 ups, 4y,
1 reply
He was a socialist he controlled the means of production and labor. Only one thought was allowed. That’s how a nation was subjugated. With speech laws and mass intimidation for unity of thought by the Nazis. Just like the leftists and progressives here now.
[deleted]
0 ups, 4y,
1 reply
evidence please.
2 ups, 4y
You look up your own history.
2 ups, 4y,
2 replies
Says the guy posting a picture as evidence.
5 ups, 4y,
3 replies
You think the picture is inaccurate? So they aren’t all socialists? That’s what history says they are, and there really isn’t any debate about it until the uninformed start spouting off about their interpretations without any actual Knowledge. Provide your proof that they aren’t socialists.
[deleted]
1 up, 4y,
1 reply
2 ups, 4y,
1 reply
I’m sorry little girl stop crying and maybe I can help you. What is it you want. To read you a story? Ok once upon a time there was this TDS suffering little girl who used a screen name of irrelevant people and she cried everywhere she went because she was so irrelevant that no one noticed her so crying was the only way to get attention. Then one day blah blah blah...........
[deleted]
2 ups, 4y,
2 replies
1 up, 4y
What is this?

And it doesn’t sound like a threat.
1 up, 4y
Projection again, just because you fantasized about Barack face banging your mouth doesn’t apply. I don’t have a leader. I have representatives and core beliefs. The Cheeto is the Cheeto and he did good work. He is not my God like Barack is yours. But you fantasizing about balls slapping your chin should be kept to yourself.
0 ups, 4y,
1 reply
Em I did up above.
1 up, 4y,
2 replies
You gave an incorrect answer. He was a socialist and most assuredly in control of the means of production and labor as all totalitarian socialists are. He was against the bolsheviks in Russia. As he was a socialist who believed in Nationalism.
0 ups, 4y,
1 reply
Wat no, the Government left many industries private, and even privatized some themselves.
http://www.ub.edu/graap/nazi.pdf
0 ups, 4y
Private? Like China has private businesses and yet is still communist
0 ups, 4y,
1 reply
China is weird. At this point, China can't really be considered Communist because of that. Even though in name it's communist, the way China works says that it isn't. In true
soviet socialism or communism that doesn't happen.
0 ups, 4y
Dude China isn’t really communist? 😂😂😂 that is such an ignorant statement I have no other response just wow you are a punch drinker. China is not our friend and they are Maoist Communists without a doubt.
[deleted]
0 ups, 4y,
1 reply
actually, that's not true anyway, obama is not a socialist.
0 ups, 4y,
2 replies
Yes he is a Marxist just like his mom dad and stepfather.
[deleted]
0 ups, 4y,
1 reply
do you have any proof?
0 ups, 4y
Proof Of what?
[deleted]
0 ups, 4y,
1 reply
then why didn't he establish it lol
0 ups, 4y
Because he couldn’t without civil war.
0 ups, 4y,
1 reply
0 ups, 4y
2 ups, 4y
[deleted]
2 ups, 4y,
2 replies
3 ups, 4y
0 ups, 4y,
2 replies
She WILL be a President
[deleted]
1 up, 4y,
1 reply
0 ups, 4y
Outstanding job there Harry
Now piss off
0 ups, 4y,
1 reply
Interesting. Trump supporter = stupid. Nice argument.
0 ups, 4y,
1 reply
A reply to HarryKuntz derogatory comment.
He deserves it.
0 ups, 4y,
1 reply
AOC better not become president.
0 ups, 4y,
1 reply
Worse that could happen?
One term President
0 ups, 4y,
1 reply
Wdym
0 ups, 4y
OMB
2 ups, 4y
LOL i hope not
[deleted]
4 ups, 4y,
1 reply
Correct
4 ups, 4y,
1 reply
Working class background with integrity.
But they worship a billionaire, has them all fooled
2 ups, 4y,
1 reply
She has some skeletons and you seem to have missed the establishment doubling down on biden.
Show More Comments
Created with the Imgflip Meme Generator
EXTRA IMAGES ADDED: 1
  • ocasio-cortez super genius
  • Smile hitler
  • IMAGE DESCRIPTION:
    WE MUST START COLLECTING INFORMATION AND THE NAMES OF TRUMP SUPPOTERS; AOC - NOVEMBER 2020; I LIKE THIS IDEA...