Imgflip Logo Icon

Why are liberals so afraid of investigations all of the sudden?

Why are liberals so afraid of investigations all of the sudden? | THERE IS NO EVIDENCE OF VOTER FRAUD!!!!! Isn't that something for "investigations" to determine? | image tagged in angry liberal,memes,black girl wat,voter fraud,democrats,china joe | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
4,135 views 36 upvotes Made by CarrickMcHwain 4 years ago in politics
17 Comments
1 up, 4y,
1 reply
Yeah...

... When there's sufficient evidence.
3 ups, 4y,
1 reply
You mean like voter machines flipping votes? How about Republican poll watchers being expelled from polling locations en masse? How about mysterious boxes of votes being dropped off at 3am? How about post dated votes being counted? How about 100's of thousands of military votes being 'lost'?
I get that you are excited you think your candidate won, but the integrity of the elections is at stake. What happens next time when Biden's opponent steal the election?
0 ups, 4y,
1 reply
If there was any substance to those claims with supporting evidence, it would be in court right now. Just because you say something happened, doesn't mean it actually has.
2 ups, 4y,
5 replies
They are in court right now. Please keep up.
0 ups, 4y
(4)
At a news conference Sunday before a crowd of cheering supporters in Las Vegas, Trump campaign officials went further, claiming that as many as 9,000 nonresidents wrongly voted and that the Clark County elections system was riddled with other fraud, without offering credible evidence.

Groans and gasps could be heard from the crowd as campaign officials accused Democratic officials in Clark County of disenfranchising Republican voters. “Stop the steal,” the crowd chanted.

Local election officials have stressed that Nevada law allows some people to vote while living out of state: students, military personnel and military spouses.

“You don’t have to live here in order to be eligible to vote here,” Joe Gloria, the Clark County registrar of voters, told reporters last week.

The addresses of Amy Rose and her husband, an Air Force service member, are on the Trump campaign’s list of out-of-state voters. Rose and her husband currently live in Davis, Calif., where she works for a veterans support organization and her husband is pursuing a doctorate, doing Air Force-funded research in aerospace engineering.

“It’s really appalling to be used as pawns” to undermine confidence in the election results, Rose said. “We both take our duties as citizens seriously. It was quite shocking to see our integrity challenged without any basis in fact.”

Nevada GOP said it has “no intention of invalidating any legal voter.” Uh huh.

A Justice Department official said the department was “looking into” the allegations but declined to provide more detail.

You see? No evidence. A big series of nothing burgers.
0 ups, 4y
Please keep up. 0/5.
0 ups, 4y
Oh, I have been. GOP is 0 for 5 in court battles as of yesterday.

Detroit: GOP claimed observers were being excluded in the curing process. That process, is when a ballot cannot be read by a machine due to stray marks or stains on the ballot. They duplicate the ballot to have it counted. GOP went on to say they had "Information and belief" that this process was done without GOP observers. When asked a judge to delay certifying Detroit's results, Judge said "Nope, GOP's evdience of misconduct was "mere speculation." adding "The City of Detroit should not be harmed when there is no evidence to support accusations of voter fraud," Judge Timothy M. Kenny wrote.

In another suit, Trump's campaign asked a judge to stop processing all absentee ballots. Here, a GOP observer said she'd been given a sticky note by an unnamed poll worker, alleging that late-arriving ballots were being counted improperly. Fine. But she couldn't provide the poll workers name. What a coincidence. Or any other proof, for that matter. "By the time this action was filed, the votes had largely been counted, and the counting is now complete," Judge Cynthia Diane Stephens wrote.

RNC Chairwoman Ronna McDaniel raised another series of claims during a news conference in Bloomfield Hills, MI alleging that election workers in Detroit were told to backdate certain bqallots. Detroit officials denied the accusation.

McDaniel acknowledged that her allegations had not been fully vetted and said the information had been shared with federal prosecuters. A DOJ official said the info McDaniel provided has been referred to the FBI. It was unclear what, if any, action the FBI took. An FBI spokeswoman in Detroit referred a reporter to the US attorney's office, which declined to comment. What a shame.

McDaniel asserted that 2k GOP ballots in Rochester Hills had been "given to Democrats... due to a clerical error." Too bad she couldn't elaborate.

Tina Barton, GOP clerk of Rochester Hills said in a video posted on Twitter that McDaniel was referring to an "Isolated mistake that was -QUICKLY- rectified. Then, called her allegation "categorically false."

Quote: "As a Republican, I am disturbed that this is intentionally being mischaracterized to undermine the election process." Barton later said in an interview that there was indeed a technical issue that temporrarily created duplicate results when mail ballots were scanned. However, this was immediately fixed.

- more
0 ups, 4y
(2) Barton said that she learned of the RNC chairwoman's claim only when a reporter called her for comment.

"I have spent 15 years building my reputation of being a good election official - not only a good one, but a great one - and to have someone make a statement that we committed fraud of some kind that 2,000 ballots were found, I couldn't stand by and not respond." Barton declared.

GEORGIA

In GA, Trump's campaign sued the day after the election, focused only on absentee ballots in Chatham County. The Campaign asked that any absentee ballots arriving after polls closed on Tuesday be set aside. Why? So long as they're postmarked before due date, in most federal processes, such documents are valid. Stupid voter suppression nonsense.

Be that as it may, in GA, requires ballots to arrive before the end of Election Day, though there's an exception for military voters and overseas voters.

Trump campaign cited an affidavit from a poll worker who said he thought he might have seen late-arriving ballots improperly mingled with ones cast on time. Even if that was true it was not an election-changing problem. The allegation dealt with a small number of ballots in a single county.

GA Democrats filed two affidavits from other poll workers who said they observed no such activity. GA judge dismissed Trump's suit in one day, writing that there was "no evidence" the county elections board had failed to comply with the law.

ARIZONA
The Trump campaign and the RNC filed suit in state court Saturday alleging that some voters were told by poll workers to push a button on a tabulating machine to cast their ballot, even after machine tabulators had detected an "overvote" - that is, the machine detected the possibility that the person had voted for TWO candidates.

Under state Rules they said voters are supposed to be allowed to cancel such ballots and to try again because sometimes stray ink marks or smudges can cause the tabulator to improperly assess an "overvote." The campaign asked a judge to order a manual review of such ballots to bar the certification of the Arizona vote until it is complete.

Trump supporters spent much of the week alleging that the tabulators were thrown off by the use of Sharpie pens and therefore disqualified large numbers of votes. State officials have insisted Sharpie pens are in fact the best writing instrument to use with the machines because of their fast-dry ink, and they do not cause problems.

(more)
0 ups, 4y,
1 reply
(3)
Voters who filed an earlier suit alleging Sharpie-caused ballot issues have dropped that one and are intervening in the new case filed by the Trump campaign, according to lawyer Alexander Kolodin. Arizona Secretary of State Katie Hobbs (D) said the new suit was a “repackaging” of that matter and merely an attempt to delay the count.

NEVADA

In Nevada, two days after the election, a group of Trump allies claimed that thousands of people had voted illegally in Clark County, home to Las Vegas.

“That is unacceptable, and it’s giving legal people a sense that the system is corrupt,” said Richard Grenell

Neither the Trump campaign nor the GOP were named plaintiffs in the federal lawsuit that was eventually filed by Republicans, which presented no evidence that thousands of people had voted improperly.

By then, the allegation had been whittled down drastically. Instead of 10,000 cases, Trump’s allies presented one: a woman named Jill Stokke, who said she was denied the right to vote in person because her mail ballot had been stolen and filled out by someone else.

But, in fact, Stokke’s story was more complicated. Election officials said they had indeed received a mail ballot from her — but the signature matched her own. They had offered her a chance to cancel that mail ballot and vote again if she would sign an affidavit saying the mail ballot had been stolen. She DID NOT FIX HER VOTE GIVEN THE OPPORTUNITY.

The Trump allies wanted U.S. District Judge Andrew Gordon to order a ban on the use of a machine for verifying signatures, a move that would have slowed down an already slow count. He did not. Instead, Gordon told the plaintiffs to return to court if they found more evidence to back their claims.

Beyond that lawsuit, GOP officials also alleged that more than 3,000 people voted in Nevada despite not living in the state.

Lawyers for the Trump campaign sent a letter Thursday to U.S. Attorney General William P. Barr alleging “criminal voter fraud in the State of Nevada” and claiming to have identified 3,062 people who voted improperly. They enclosed a list of addresses of voters who they said had moved out of state, information they said came from cross-checking voter data with the National Change of Address database.

(more)
0 ups, 4y,
1 reply
Sources for any of these? I bet they are mainstream media like CNN that doesn't provide sources of their own.

All of the live press conferences I've seen say almost exactly the opposite.
0 ups, 4y,
1 reply
Here's a few examples...

https://thenevadaindependent.com/article/trump-campaign-nv-gop-file-emergency-appeal-to-state-supreme-court-to-limit-mail-ballot-counting-in-clark-county
https://thenevadaindependent.com/article/judge-rejects-trump-campaign-effort-to-slow-down-amend-clark-county-mail-ballot-counting-and-processing-system
https://www.jurist.org/news/2020/11/trump-campaign-wins-election-lawsuit-in-pennsylvania-loses-in-georgia-and-michigan/
https://www.cisa.gov/rumorcontrol
https://www.freep.com/story/news/politics/elections/2020/11/09/detroit-lawsuit-misconduct-elections/6218612002/
0 ups, 4y,
1 reply
Lower courts get appealed and overturned all the time, remember these judges are all the same ones that got appointed/elected by the same poll workers.
0 ups, 4y,
1 reply
Like I said, it's just a few examples.

I will say this for Trump. He is a man who enjoys being historic. I think he is the first President to ever refuse a president-elect.
0 ups, 4y,
3 replies
Yeah, 100's of millions is not 'a few examples'. They've found massive verified fraud now. The mainstream news won't touch it. That means when Trump gets the electors people are going to completely confused because they were told Biden won. It will wake a lot of people up to the corruption and collusion of the media.
0 ups, 4y
"100s of millions huh?"
Auto-correct. Its 100's of thousands.
0 ups, 4y
You realize, for there to be 100s of millions, there needs to be more than one hundred million. There has to be at least 200 million. Even so, most people don't say "Hundreds" for two. They say Hundreds for a great number.

You DO realize only 150 million people voted, right?

For there to be "100's of millions" of voter fraud, that would imply that the entirety of the election is over 100% fraud.

Are you high?
0 ups, 4y
100s of millions huh?
Created with the Imgflip Meme Generator
EXTRA IMAGES ADDED: 1
  • Angry Liberal
  • Black Girl Wat
  • IMAGE DESCRIPTION:
    THERE IS NO EVIDENCE OF VOTER FRAUD!!!!! Isn't that something for "investigations" to determine?