none so blind as those who will not see

Nope, they have millions of votes that are verifiably fraudulent with dead people voting, people voting multiple times, people voting for other people, missing ballots, etc...etc... we caught the dems dead to rights.

Mmmm, hundreds of signed affidavits (which is they lie on them they get jail time), videos of the poll watchers filling out blank ballots and transcribing xerox copies, millions of dead voters, millions of people who got their vote stole by mail, millions of dems that voted multiple times. It takes time to go through the courts and recounts aren't even done yet.

I will when it gets appealed to the supreme court and they make a decision.

4nyfdq.jpg (click to show)

It's getting closer!

Many of these cases have not made it to the Supreme Court.

Nor will they...
Definitely soros.
:P

Oh they will eventually make it there, but the news won't cover it, and they'll be quietly dismissed by so called 'conservative' and 'republican' justices that want to protect the people that appointed them.

Oh? Who appointed them?

Incorrect. Democrats in 2016 believed their own hype that Hillary was a good 5% ahead in the polls.

So they only implemented the standard amount of fraud. Just enough in their minds to ensure victory. The margin of fraud typically "baked in" to favor Dems is around 3%. Not too much to attract attention, but enough to get their guy over the top.

https://www.heritage.org/election-integrity/commentary/new-report-exposes-thousands-illegal-votes-2016-election

An institute co-founded by recently arrested fraudster Steve Bannon claims 8,471 "highly likely" duplicate votes were found across 21 states (doesnt specify for which candidate.)

..... vs Trump's alleged 3 to 5.7 million specifically for him.

In the past I have compared the voter fraud narrative to the coronavirus narrative... Looks like it still applies!

Ahh yes, the bastion if blind justice, the SDNY. Please tell me, is "arrested" the same as "found guilty?"

For every illegitimate vote uncovered, there are hundreds to thousands of them that cannot be disqualified.

For example, the untold hundreds of thousands of illegitimate mail-in ballots backdated after being "corrected" which were shuffled in with all the legitimate votes before SCOTUS ordered PA officials to keep them separate.

The PA results are irredeemably corrupted. By design.

No, I asked if they are the same thing in the context of your dismissal of a heritage.org article due to the association with Steve Bannon.

Are they the same thing?

Here's one just getting started now from 2018...
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/texas-official-arrested-on-felony-election-fraud-charges-could-face-99-year-sentence/ar-BB19oEIV

...and another...
https://www.dailywire.com/news/texas-charges-social-worker-with-134-felony-counts-involving-election-fraud

And in, here's one for the 2014-2016 timeframe.
https://nypost.com/2020/05/21/ex-philly-election-official-pleads-guilty-to-voter-fraud/