Imgflip Logo Icon

Anyone who buys into this hypocritical, undemocratic BS is an idiot.

Anyone who buys into this hypocritical, undemocratic BS is an idiot. | Stop counting in Pennsylvania, Michigan, and North Carolina; Keep counting in Arizona and Nevada; TRUMP | image tagged in two buttons,arizona,pennsylvania,nevada,north carolina,count every vote | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
Two Buttons memeCaption this Meme
50 Comments
0 ups, 3y,
1 reply
Votes should only be counted as long as someone is allowed to observe the counting to verify that there's no fraud taking place.
Michigan for example kicked out the observers and blocked viewing what was going on.
Thats an issue.
1 up, 3y
From what I've seen, in Michigan there was already a legal maximum of poll watchers in the polling place, so they're preventing additional people from coming in. And no, if a place does not allow poll watchers, that doesn't mean that all those ballots shouldn't be counted. That's objectively undemocratic. You could make an argument for a RECOUNT, but not throwing all of the votes away.

https://www.detroitnews.com/story/news/politics/2020/11/04/poll-challengers-converge-detroit-amid-close-election-results/6161484002/
1 up, 3y,
1 reply
Democrats commit voter fraud all the time. deal with it.
0 ups, 3y,
1 reply
Wanting someone watch to prevent fraud after being shut out and then irregularities occurring doesn't sound like "hypocritical, undemocratic BS", or did you not bother to look into the issue at all?
1 up, 3y,
1 reply
I think wanting votes to continue to be counted in states that Trump is currently losing while wanting votes to be thrown out where Trump is winning (or in Michigan, losing) is hypocritical, undemocratic BS.
1 up, 3y,
1 reply
So feels over reason. The issue is that without transparency fraud (or even just plain mistakes) will become harder to detect after the fact.
1 up, 3y,
1 reply
I'm literally using direct, observable fact. It's no surprise what Trump's doing here. He's trying to steal the election through hypocritical and undemocratic means, which I have already explained. You are either too unfathomably stupid to see what's going on or you know exactly what's going on and you're okay with it.
1 up, 3y,
1 reply
No you're stating a literal opinion and employing a fallacies to cover you behind. http://charltonteaching.blogspot.com/2019/07/bulverism-and-mainstream-dominant-left.html
1 up, 3y,
3 replies
Except what Trump is doing right now is the most clear-cut, obvious, conspicuous, and frankly desperate attempt of stealing an election in anthropological history. If this was done by a democrat, you would be up in arms declaring this to be a bald faced attempt at stealing the election, and rightly so. But you won't because you're a partisan hack who's doing everything to cover for Trump's hypocritical and undemocratic BS.

When he's actively campaigning to discount votes in states that he is leading and pushing additional votes to be counted in states the he is not, he is trying to steal the election. No ifs, no ands, no buts. It's unbelievably insane to me how you can't (or are unwilling to) comprehend this.
[deleted]
0 ups, 3y,
1 reply
0 ups, 3y,
1 reply
Dude, you're lagging behind. Most magahats are already at the 4th or 5th stage of grief while you're still stranded at the 1st. Will you catch up man?
[deleted]
0 ups, 3y,
1 reply
0 ups, 3y,
1 reply
Always willing to support someone in times of pain and suffering.
0 ups, 3y
I'll get to the "leftists" later. For now, magahats like seem to be exhibiting the most pain and suffering.
[deleted]
0 ups, 3y,
1 reply
1 up, 3y,
1 reply
No, that's multiple Bulverisms and Ad Hominems you're using to hide that you have very biased hateful opinions that you're trying to pass of as a facts and plug your ears when challenged over it.
1 up, 3y,
1 reply
0 ups, 3y,
1 reply
A red hat for you, you earned it.
0 ups, 3y
Says the anti American leftist . I found a red hat for you. You earned it too
0 ups, 3y,
1 reply
Stop counting until they can be observed
1 up, 3y,
2 replies
They are. And I'm pretty sure voting doesn't have to be observed by poll watchers to be validated.
0 ups, 3y
Are you Canadian?
0 ups, 3y,
1 reply
You would be wrong. Parties are allowed to have representatives access to observe the count
0 ups, 3y,
1 reply
Yeah they're allowed, but I'm pretty sure a vote can commence without poll watchers. Correct me if I'm wrong.
0 ups, 3y
Every state is different but denying access is generally illegal. So the denial of access can be seen as a cover for monkey business. We will see as it depends on the reason for denial etc.
[deleted]
0 ups, 3y,
1 reply
0 ups, 3y,
1 reply
cope
[deleted]
0 ups, 3y,
1 reply
0 ups, 3y,
1 reply
[deleted]
0 ups, 3y,
1 reply
0 ups, 3y,
2 replies
Ah, I was waiting for that comment. What was once mere election anxiety that you suffered from has now advanced into PESD, or post election stress disorder. Symptoms of this condition include, loss of critical thinking skills, brain decay, loss of hair or “malding”, denial of the obvious, and irritability. I advise you take a daily dose of seething copium to alleviate this debilitating ailment before more brain functions are impaired. Get it quick, because theres been an uptick of PESD cases across the country, so the supply of copium has been steadily decreasing.
[deleted]
0 ups, 3y,
1 reply
0 ups, 3y,
1 reply
[deleted]
0 ups, 3y,
1 reply
0 ups, 3y,
1 reply
[deleted]
0 ups, 3y,
1 reply
0 ups, 3y,
1 reply
Ahem...I think the word you're looking for is "diagnosis."
[deleted]
0 ups, 3y,
1 reply
0 ups, 3y,
2 replies
To answer your question, the diagnosis was typed and delivered by yours truly. My question to you is, did you find any vats of copium in the pharmacy? I'm worried there might be a shortage.
0 ups, 3y
And I assume the pharmacy ran out of copium, no?
0 ups, 3y
Your word against mine. Take your pick.
0 ups, 3y,
2 replies
https://www.projectveritas.com/news/michigan-usps-insider-delivers-testimony-of-shady-postmark-scheme-to/
1 up, 3y,
1 reply
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH PROJECT VERITAS LMAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

They literally offered one of the people in the Ilhan Omar "expose" a bribe. I trust nothing they say.
0 ups, 3y,
1 reply
Looked up the claim of the bribe, found zero evidence.
1 up, 3y,
1 reply
https://www.fox9.com/news/subject-of-project-veritas-voter-fraud-story-says-he-was-offered-bribe

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/09/29/us/politics/project-veritas-ilhan-omar.html
0 ups, 3y
First link: No actual evidence. Just the word of the person stung, so one way or another they are a lair.
Second link: I cannot really read it. But I foun a quote from it. https://electionlawblog.org/?p=115984
Which doesn't actually say the dory is wrong at all, but also doesn't prove coordination either.
But lets go to the NYT's source, https://www.eipartnership.net/rapid-response/project-veritas-ballotharvesting
All it proves is that is was promoted well and nothing more. Looks like you fell for framing.

So still no evidence.
0 ups, 3y
Project Veritas is worthless.
Two Buttons memeCaption this Meme
Created with the Imgflip Meme Generator
IMAGE DESCRIPTION:
Stop counting in Pennsylvania, Michigan, and North Carolina; Keep counting in Arizona and Nevada; TRUMP