Trump once again refused to denounce QAnon. But politics: you have the chance to do so right here, right now. (Prove me wrong!)

Whatever Q-ANON is, it's NOT violent. So when are Joe and kamala going to denounce the radical and violent organizations ANTIFA and BLM? Asking for a friend.

You know the shooter had an IMDB page?
You know the only thing he hit was a Hard Drive on a PC which was used in the restaurant?
Little bit odd for him to have the page and only hit a hard drive.
Still looks like a false flag even all these years on.

One event versus how many events radical and hate-filled leftists have been involved in during these last six months? How many people have ended up maimed for life or in body bags due to radical leftists?

Glad you asked!

https://www.google.com/amp/s/mobile.reuters.com/article/amp/idUSKBN25V2O1

Eyyy softballs today

Then why is his campaign providing them bail money?

Thought you would slip that one past? The question was when BOTH Biden and Kamala would denounce the terrorist organizations of BOTH ANTIFA and BLM. Tap dance . . . better.

Re: Kamala Harris

https://www.google.com/amp/s/m.jpost.com/breaking-news/kamala-harris-condemns-looting-violence-in-wake-of-police-shooting-640255/amp

[Jerusalem Post: “Fake news” or nah]

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.foxnews.com/politics/biden-condemns-antifa-violent-protests.amp

Here he is again re: antifa specifically.

Fox News article! So you know it’s not fake!

QAnon is a radicalized group deep down a conspiracy rabbit-hole which apparently thinks Trump is the only thing standing between a nefarious “deep state” and innumerable child victims of pedophilia and cannibalism(!)

So if Q adherents aren’t rioting and committing mass shootings now, it’s because they have no reason to, basically, as they think Trump is on the case.

However, the Pizzagate incident/shooting (which happened way way back in 2016) was a cautionary tale of what these internet conspiracies can lead to, and that was before the “Q” movement even formally existed.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.esquire.com/news-politics/news/amp51268/what-is-pizzagate/

If Trump loses in November as the polls predict, what is Q going to do? What is Q going to say to his brainwashed followers, and how will they respond?

Even if Q says nothing, will his supporters take matters into their own hands to “save the children”?

That’s the million-dollar question

So: condemn or nah?

Get back to us when they start routinely rioting, looting, burning, mugging, and murdering for month after month while Dem Party mayors stand down the police. Then you will have something . . . having THEN correctly identified the terrorists inside this nation.

Just so we’re clear: The riots we’re talking about were spontaneous rage directed at this and similar incidents.

If you want to start with the blame game over this, start with Officer Derek Chauvin.

No kneecop, no murder, no riots.

Yes, I know you're so damned stupid you think that photo proves cause of death. I'm sorry for your severe cognitive impairments. You know what doesn't show up in photos? Lethal amounts of fentanyl.

You know what doesn't show up in your brain? The Autopsy report. Have a good long read

The “riots” have been greatly and tremendously exaggerated. Peaceful protests have constituted about 93% of the reaction to these police brutality incidents.

More to the point, they’re a reaction to *specific injustices*, as MLK explained here.

Even as he “condemned riots”!

We can walk and chew gum about this at the same time. Fix the problems and the riots go away.

But how do we react to something like Q that is invented out of whole cloth?

Well: I think it starts, at a bare minimum, with a vigorous denunciation both by President Trump and other Republicans who are the intended beneficiaries of this wackadoo theory aimed at Dems.

So wait, are you condemning riots or excusing them? You seem confused.

Are you saying I’m confused or that MLK is confused? Because my own viewpoint on “riots” is exactly his.

It’s a nuanced and complex point, but read it enough times and think about it long enough and his teaching is unmistakable.

For ease of reading here I’ve embiggened the takeaway message.

Not really, no. When you burn and loot and assault innocent people because you're stupid and violent, decent people have no reason to respect your cause. That this is black people's preferred method of "protest" is not my problem.

And no, they're not exaggerated. Their riots have killed over 30 Americans these past few months, and destroyed thousands of lives through burning down homes and businesses. That you side with those useless, violent mobs tells us exactly who you are.

Who is the more based and redpilled theorist of race relations and social justice?

The world may never know

You can't "redpill" someone with lies, which is what MLK Jr. spread.

Yes, the vile, corrupt elitists make a hero out of him. That tells you what he is.

Doubling down when called out: Entirely expected

Any more invective you’d like to hurl MLK’s way today?

He sustained far worse abuse than this in his time, so I don’t think he’d mind

Go ahead, let it rip

"Social justice and progress are the absolute guarantors of riot prevention."

That sounds a lot like "give us what we want or we'll burn down your city." F--k him.

Actually no

It means we all have an interest in rectifying the social injustices that our country has subjected African-Americans to for centuries and whose effects still persist today: injustices that can and should be reversed for everyone’s sake.

But if you want to toss all that aside and say “f—k MLK,” okay.

At least you are being honest.

Nah, it means give us what we want or we'll burn down your cities.

And yes, f--k MLK. He was a plagiarizing, adultery-committing, lying fool who's been propped up as a hero by corrupt liars.

I can only assume this is the number of f’s MLK gives about your efforts to miss the point of his civil rights legacy

It's fascinating how you pretend you're defending MLK Jr., but you never actually address anything I've said. You just keep saying he's great, he's great, he's great, but never once address any of the charges against him. You're pathetic.

Give me a list of everything bad MLK has done, and then weigh it against everything good he has done

I don’t need to defend your silly charges against MLK

It is sufficient to point out you are an insane troll who appreciates nothing of his contributions to civil rights and racial equity in this country

And by implication you are a person with little grasp of racial issues today

Change my mind

There is no racial equality in this country. There never will be. You cannot make inherently unequal things equal.

And you're still voting for Biden even though everything that keeps Blacks down has origins in the Democratic Party1

I feel like the entirety of Republican logic is that the the party switch in the 1930s never happened. Abraham Lincoln was actually left-wing, and was supported by Karl Marx during the Civil War.

By the way, the idea that black people are "unheard" in America today and thus must riot is risible.

Who got Epstein his sweetheart deal in 2008? It wasn't President Trump.

Funny how for a "fringe group" that is "out of the mainstream", Qanon absolutely terrifies the Left.
Methinks thou protest too much.

Article

https://apple.news/Adtm4V_hQQiWLQ25WcLNXiQ