episode 3, guys !

What do you mean ? He wanted to create jobs, get the economy off the ground and repatriate the troops deployed in the Middle East...

And how's that economy going? Did that mild tax rebate you got some time ago make up for the financial strain of the last six months?

The one had nothing to do with the other. Every politician alive would have shut down the US at Fauci's bidding. Get real.

hows that wall that Mexico is paying for going

First of all, like antithesis said, his promises are shit. Second of all, Trump objectively kept less promises than Obama (24% to 47% respectively).

https://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/promises/trumpometer/
https://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/promises/obameter/?ruling=true

lol politifact... You know they are run by the leftist media right? They've been caught lying more than 1,000 times.

Say it with me: g-e-n-e-t-i-c f-a-l-l-a-c-y

Say it with me "double standard". I'm showing your hypocrisy.

What hypocrisy?

How the leftists claim Trump lied over 1000 times. Even though that entire list was debunked.

What list was debunked?

The list of over 1000 Trump lies. When examined it was found that some were future based statements like "We will try to...". Others were artificial distinctions like when he said wall and then built a large metal fence. Others were things that were thought to be one way at the time and when more info came in Trump changed his opinion.

Can I have the link?

https://www.aim.org/aim-column/posts-list-of-trump-lies-reaches-10000-through-dubious-means/

https://lovebreedsaccountability.com/2019/07/26/debunking-the-medias-top-6-lies-about-president-trump/

https://lovebreedsaccountability.com/2020/09/05/debunking-the-medias-lie-about-trump-lying-20000-times/

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2020/09/04/whs_mcenany_atlantic_report_on_trump_has_been_categorically_debunked_by_witnesses_clearly_fake_news.html#!

https://www.aim.org/aim-column/another-set-of-easily-debunked-claims-of-trump-lies-out-after-campaign-kickoff/

So you're extrapolating a flawed Wapo analysis of Trump's lies and pretending that politifact is now wrong. Now that's what we call a non sequitur. Source A is flawed therefore Source B is flawed isn't a sound argument.

"So you're extrapolating a flawed Wapo analysis of Trump's lies and pretending that politifact is now wrong. Now that's what we call a non sequitur. Source A is flawed therefore Source B is flawed isn't a sound argument."

Nice strawman. Not what I was doing at all. Politifact is wrong because they're wrong. Please try reading the articles and keeping the premise in mind.

My favorite part is where they say the first 1,700 lies are the exact same statement that Trump repeated multiple times.

"Nice strawman. Not what I was doing at all."

Why else would you respond to politifact with stuff countering wapo? This is the only possible argument you can make if you're citing unrelated sources.

"Politifact is wrong because they're wrong."

I don't think I have to explain to you why that's BS logic.

"Please try reading the articles and keeping the premise in mind."

Again, because one source's premise is flawed, does NOT mean that another source's premise is also flawed. That has to be proven.

He sent out dog-whistle promises to his base to be racist. That's why they voted for him.

lol no.
Racist Dog Whistle: When a politician sends out a secret signal that no one sees to his secretly racist base. Conspiracy theory much?