They'll deny it everywhere but in court

• “I told him that if he could provide me information and evidence about WHO actually gave him the DNC emails, I would then call on President Trump to pardon him,”
• “At no time did I offer a deal made by the president, nor did I say I was representing the president.”

They can deny the claim publicly all they like, the DOJ accepted the claim as fact when they allowed it to be entered into evidence without dispute this morning.

And it will go nowhere. To accomplish nothing...

You really don't grasp the topic at hand, do you? This is the extradition hearing to bring Assange to the US to face justice, and the DOJ admitted it happened.

What does going nowhere in this context mean to you?

Trump made no such offer. At worst Assange will get a slap on the wrist & a 2 year stay at a resort prison. They have conjugal visits there.

Trump will still be President & no one will care in 3 years.

Except he did, and his DOJ admitted to as much by allowing that claim to be entered into evidence uncontested this morning.

Again, this is no different from when the Huckster stood up there at her podium lying to us for months, but admitted doing so under oath where telling a lie would have led to actual consequences.

Who lied about what at what podium - no one cares anymore about that either...

Since you are replying to my comment it should be about my comment, right?
Here’s the article I quoted (again) [https://www.theguardian.com/media/2020/feb/19/donald-trump-offered-julian-assange-pardon-russia-hack-wikileaks]

You wrote:
• “the DOJ” – this was in the UK, and it states at the court, not necessarily in court proceedings
• “accepted the claim as fact” -- If a prosecution or defense submits ‘evidence’ the court does not accept it as fact! All ‘evidence’ can be challenged by the defense or prosecution

Or by anyone with a lick of sense and not by people licking glass.

“It is difficult to confront madness, because insanity is a stranger to reason and any reasonable response would be insane"

In 2024 - will you still be complaining about this with Trump leaving office or just Flame Waring whomever is the RNC Candidate for that election...?

https://www.theguardian.com/media/2020/feb/19/donald-trump-offered-julian-assange-pardon-russia-hack-wikileaks

Assange’s lawyer, Edward Fitzgerald, alleged that during a visit to London in August 2017, congressman Dana Rohrabacher told the WikiLeaks founder that “on instructions from the president, he was offering a pardon or some other way out, if Mr Assange … said Russia had nothing to do with the DNC [Democratic National Committee] leaks.”

Rohrabacher denied the claim:
• “At no time did I talk to President Trump about Julian Assange,”
• “Likewise, I was NOT directed by Trump or anyone else connected with him to meet with Julian Assange.
• “I was on my own fact finding mission at personal expense to find out information I thought was important to our country.
• “At no time did I offer Julian Assange anything from the president because I had not spoken with the president about this issue at all.
• “when speaking with Julian Assange, I told him that if he could provide me information and evidence about who actually gave him the DNC emails, I would then call on President Trump to pardon him,”
• “At no time did I offer a deal made by the president, nor did I say I was representing the president.”

White House spokeswoman Stephanie Grisham told reporters:
• “The president barely knows Dana Rohrabacher other than he’s an ex-congressman. He’s never spoken to him on this subject or almost any subject.”
• “It is a complete fabrication and a total lie,” Grisham said. “This is probably another never-ending hoax and total lie from the DNC.”

I'm not sure why you find their denials so convincing - this is no different from when Huckster-Sanders stood there lying to us for months, and then folded the instant she was under oath.

So let me see if I understand what you are professing…
• Julian Assange’s lawyer makes a claim of ‘collusion’, that is negative to President Trump, and you believe it..
• Julian Assange states "Our source is not the Russian government. It is not state parties”, which is positive for President Trump, and you don’t believe it….
???????????????????????
https://www.cnn.com/2017/01/04/politics/assange-wikileaks-hannity-intv/index.html

• Assange repeated, "Our source is not the Russian government. It is not state parties”
• Assange also denied talking to Russian President Vladimir Putin, his surrogates or anyone associated with the Trump campaign.
• Assange also told Hannity he would have "absolutely" released information about Trump and his campaign if he had received it. He added that the White House's "dramatic response," directly accusing Russia of orchestrating the hacks, is an attempt to "delegitimize" Trump's presidency, something he believes the defeated party will continue to do.
• "(The Democratic Party) will seize on this and harp on it for the next four years," he said.

https://www.cnn.com/2017/01/04/politics/assange-wikileaks-hannity-intv/index.html

A lawsuit filed by Ed Butowsky alleges Wikileaks founder Julian Assange confirmed to Fox News analyst Ellen Ratner that the DNC leaked emails were received from Seth Rich and his brother Aaron.

If this information is true and accurate, the DOJ claim of a Russian hack – based on assertions by DNC contractor, Crowdstrike– would be entirely false. Additionally the DC murder of Seth Rich would hold a far more alarming motive.

https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2019/07/15/lawsuit-claims-julian-assange-confirmed-dnc-emails-received-from-seth-rich-not-a-russian-hack/

FFS - Crowdstrike, the company given the server by the FBI to analyse it - the CEO in a Congressional enquiry, said UNDER OATH - there was "no evidence of any data being removed by Russian hackers"

Leftist tards are so predictable, so unimaginative and so boring with their constant lies.
That's what happens when you have absolutely nothing positive to offer the populace.
It's why they are going to lose the elections in a huge backlash against their insane lies.

No, this is a liberal meme, because liberals know that Crowdstrike said there was no hack of the DNC server. A leftist knows this, as liberal is just a sneaky conservative and agrees with most of what you do.

So you're saying Democrats are mad their treachery got Publically leaked? So that everyone could see the lies & hypocrisy? Mannnn Russia sure is bad.

I remember in 1980s when Russia was trying to take us down, lets rekindle that useless war again. Nice meme

They never stopped trying to take us down - they just convinced the Republicans to help by showing how it would mean they'd get to be the autocrats.

Lmao - that's rich. If they wanted to take us down, they would help the Democrats.

Yeah, they should totally use the Americans who actively fought against their hostile invasion instead of moronic goons like Manafort and Rudy who supported their aggressions for cash.

I said if they wanted to destroy us.... Not that they wanted Americans to prosper. Oh noes. Someone I never met made money.

Anyways