Global Warming does exist, but it's not the problem here!

EXCELLENT work...I need more Mutombo meme's stat =)

Wildfires absolutely have something to do with climate change. You're just ignorant on how.

Sources with science please?

https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2018GL080959
https://www.carbonbrief.org/explainer-how-climate-change-is-affecting-wildfires-around-the-world
https://climate.nasa.gov/news/2912/satellite-data-record-shows-climate-changes-impact-on-fires/
https://yaleclimateconnections.org/2019/07/wildfires-and-climate-change-whats-the-connection/
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2020/01/200114074046.htm
https://www.pnas.org/content/113/42/11770
https://www.newscientist.com/article/2229902-analysis-confirms-that-climate-change-is-making-wildfires-worse/
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1023/B:CLIM.0000024667.89579.ed

I could continue, but you get the idea. There are dozens upon dozens upon dozens of scientific literature supporting the idea that climate change exacerbates wildfires. It's an objective, inarguable fact.

Link 1. Cites "17 climate models" many of the anthropomorphic climate models have been debunked, or are not shared publicly so they can be peer-reviewed by the public. Anything depending on these models is suspect.

Link 2. Cites a study that compare the 2019/2020 weather with 1900 weather, which may or may not be a low or high point in drought. Its not a valid study unless it compares to a range of years such as 1900 to 1950 where you can get the average weather for those years. Cherry picking a single year will give you the results you want.

Link 3. This one appears like a valid study because its based on actual weather and wild fire data collected within the past century and not on climate models. Its conclusion is that the wild fire 'season' has lengthened over the past few years. This doesn't show a connection to anthropomorphic climate change like you want though. It only shows that recently the weather has been more favorable to wild fires. It does not show any comparison to years before 1950 or so.

Link 4. This is just another article about Link 3's study.

Link 5. "Human-induced climate change promotes the conditions on which wildfires depend, increasing their likelihood -- according to a review of research on global climate change and wildfire risk published today." This one assumes human induced climate change rather than just saying "The changing climate". Doesn't connect anything.

Link 6. "We use modeled climate projections to estimate the contribution of anthropogenic climate change to observed increases in eight fuel aridity metrics and forest fire area across the western United States." This one also assumes human-induced climate change as if it were fact. No actual connection to anything but the recent weather change.

Link 7. This one cites the Nasa study already discussed above. No actual evidence.

Link 8. Connects recent droughts with higher fire risks. No one is disputing that. The dispute is a connection to human-induced climate change.

No one is arguing that the localized change to climate over the past few years is causing better conditions for wild fires. We are arguing that human induced climate change has nothing to do with it as it is an unproven hypothesis in a handful of suspect models that don't accurately predict anything.

Wait so most of your counters is just you denying anthropogenic climate change......which is even more of an undeniable fact. This is a widely accepted fact by a consensus of scientists worldwide and most reasonable people. There are literally thousands of studies supporting this and listing them all is a waste of time.
https://climate.nasa.gov/scientific-consensus/
https://climate.nasa.gov/evidence/
https://www.climate.gov/news-features/climate-qa/isnt-there-lot-disagreement-among-climate-scientists-about-global-warming

Actually many scientists have proven human-induced climate change isn't real. Also several scientists have came out or been outed faking evidence on which all of the climate models are based.

https://www.newsmax.com/FastFeatures/anthropogenic-global-warming-debunked-facts/2014/11/14/id/607290/

https://www.naturalnews.com/2019-07-12-climate-change-hoax-collapses-new-science-cloud-cover.html

https://www.rt.com/news/464051-finnish-study-no-evidence-warming/

https://www.forbes.com/sites/uhenergy/2016/12/14/fact-checking-the-97-consensus-on-anthropogenic-climate-change/#5dc9f29e1157

http://www.globalclimatescam.com/opinion/top-ten-reasons-climate-change-is-a-hoax/

https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Climategate

1.
a. https://skepticalscience.com/global-cooling-january-2007-to-january-2008.htm
b. I'll have to look more into that one.
c.https://skepticalscience.com/antarctica-gaining-ice.htm
d.https://www.skepticalscience.com/lu-2013-cfcs.html
e. Own link says that study does not debunk climate change
More recent study shows deep ocean is warming: https://phys.org/news/2020-05-deep-ocean-slowlybut.html#:~:text=The%20deep%20ocean%20is%20warming%20slowly%E2%80%94but%20dramatic%20changes%20are%20ahead,-by%20University%20of&text=The%20world%27s%20deep%20oceans%20are,by%20University%20of%20Queensland%20Ph.
https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/2016GL071661

2. Thoroughly debunked here:
https://climatefeedback.org/claimreview/non-peer-reviewed-manuscript-falsely-claims-natural-cloud-changes-can-explain-global-warming/
https://skepticalscience.com/clouds-negative-feedback.htm

3. Same as 2

4. This is not debunking climate change, just doubting the exact 97% scientific consensus

5.
a. weather not climate
b. weather not climate
c. weather not climate
d. Al Gore is not a climate scientist, but the consensus among them is that the ocean is rising
e. https://skepticalscience.com/polar-bears-global-warming.htm
https://polarbearsinternational.org/research/research-qa/are-polar-bear-populations-increasing-in-fact-booming/
f. Have to research more, but I doubt this "debunks" climate change
g. Link doesn't work in the article but here are some debunks to the intro:
https://skepticalscience.com/co2-increase-is-natural-not-human-caused.htm
https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-51464694
h. Very outdated but temperatures have been increasing
https://www.noaa.gov/news/2019-was-2nd-hottest-year-on-record-for-earth-say-noaa-nasa#:~:text=NASA%20also%20found%20that%202010,second%20warmest%20for%20the%20globe.
i. irrelevant

6. Haven't heard of "climategate" before, but a cursory google search reveals it to be a myth.
https://www.ucsusa.org/resources/debunking-misinformation-about-stolen-climate-emails
https://www.factcheck.org/2009/12/climategate/
https://www.desmogblog.com/2014/11/19/climategate-five-years-later
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/climategate-scientist-cleared-in-inquiry-again/

That's your main issue. You are using google. Do some research on your own using other engines. Also watch Plandemic 2, much better than the first. They show that most of those fact check sites are owned by a very few groups of leftists and that they constantly lie. They also show how lots of media sites will put out almost identical articles to "debunk" something and it turns out they are tilting at strawmans.

What is that something?