Dem Pundits on Jobs

Yeah... Wuhan Flu kinda stopped the world for months. People seem to somehow forget that.

You don't get credit for putting out the fire you started.

hahahahahaha. Yeah because he invented the virus and brought it here.

And you don't get credit for brainlessly parroting empty campaign slogans like "trump caused the China virus" hahaha what a joker!

Here is a fact review for you.
--Obama Fauci -- offshored the researched Whuan
--Obama Fauci - funded 3.7M in Wuhan research
--Virus strain engineered in Wuhan China, not Trump tower
--Fauci in January - We have nothing to worry about
--Trump's reaction time 9 days from first reported case in America
--Shut down flights from China (opposed by ALL democrats)-- saved tens of thousands of lives
--Supplies of PPE left depleted by O'Failure and corrupt NY Governor despite money in the trillion dollar joke stimulus that lined his campaign donors' pockets
--In record time, trump ramped up PPE production, built multiple hospitals
--Half of deaths resulted from Dem governors intentionally locking covid positives into nursing homes.
--Job losses 20M immediately resulted from Democrat Governors and Mayors needlessly shutting down economies for 5 months.

Only a fool believes trump caused the coronoa virus or 5 months of needless shut down

Wake up. That "whistle" sound is air going in one ear and out the other.

1) you are not an "awake researcher" you have an internet connection and watch shitty youtube videos.

2) no one offshored shit to Wuhan.

3) No one funded research.

4) No one engineered the virus.

5) yes, he did say that. And then when new information was learned, he changed what he said. Like you should do- not keep saying the same thing when you learn you were wrong.

6) he stopped SOME travel from China. Specifically, only Chinese nationals coming from Wuhan. But if you were returning from China- including Wuhan- you were allowed in to the country.

7) Oh, you mean the PPE stockpiles that the Obama administration requested funds to restock and the Republican led house and senate denied? Those stockpiles?

8) the "stimulus" for the states? When the Federal government seized the supplies the states had bought, then sold it to contractors who then forced the states to bid against each other for those supplies? You mean that? Because that's what happened.

9) you mean the hospitals he spent $660 million on and immediately shut down without admitting a single patient? Those hospitals?

10) What choice did they have but shut down? Trump was literally saying "we're a back up, I don't take responsibility" for leading the country. What else were they supposed to do but shut down? The point of a shut down, is to slow the spread in order to buy time to create and execute a national plan.

Like every other country in the world did.

But not here? What was the plan? What is the plan now? Can you say what's the plan to stop this?

Close to 190,000+ people are dead. Millions are jobless. Many are facing evictions right now. All because Trump's failure of leadership. What few actions he took, he made things worse.

You can hear him in a recording he knew was happening say how deadly it was and that he was going to downplay it. He told people it was a hoax. That it wasn't that bad. That "soon the cases will go down to 0." That it was under control.

Its all public knowledge. Please go do some research using something other than google.

I refer you to point 1.

I refer you to go do some actual research like I did. I do not watch videos I read articles and go to sources to find the information. The only videos I watch are of the actual events and I watch the full clip, not some cut up CNN clip.

I'm interested in your "research." But we're going to focus on one:

-Obama Fauci -- offshored the researched Whuan

You need to provide a link to an accredited institution or news source that documents this "offshored the research."

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/news/u-s-governments-3-7-million-grant-to-wuhan-lab-at-center-of-coronavirus-outbreak/

A study found Children's Health Defense was one of major buyers of anti-vaccine Facebook advertising in December 2018 and February 2019.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/health/2019/11/15/majority-anti-vaccine-ads-facebook-were-funded-by-two-groups/

They're anti-vaxxers. There's nothing accredited or factual about them.

You know what? I'll do this for you. If you had put some REAL effort into it, you would have found the Daily Mail story.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8211257/Wuhan-lab-performing-experiments-bats-coronavirus-caves.html

BUT the Daily Mail is a rag like the National Enquirer. so it's not a valid source. Moving on.

However, if you had done just a bit more digging you would have found the USA today story.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2020/05/04/fact-check-obama-administration-did-not-send-3-7-m-wuhan-lab/3061490001/

That's a credible source. They're apolitical too.

So, looking through the story and checking all of the links the provide... you would have seen that the Obama Administration in 2014 did approve a grant to EcoHealth Alliance, a research group that tracks emerging diseases, overseen by the National Institutes of Health.

The EcoHealth Alliance is a nongovernmental research group that focuses on emerging diseases caused by human and animal interactions. The National Institutes of Health has consistently funded the organization for projects since at least 2002.

(meaning GW Bush Administration is now involved).

So, we have $3.7 million being distributed to a US research group overseen by the US National Institutes of Health. Which is very specific- they have to meet certain guidelines, etc. They're not just handed the money. And it's spread out over 5 years.

You can read ALL ABOUT EcoHealth's funding at https://www.nih.gov/grants-funding.

What you will find is EcoHealth was one of several groups overseen by the NIH and only received $133,000 in the first four years and about $66,000 in the second.

Now, it's that "the second" 4 years that I found really interesting.

Because if you do some math...2014 + 5 = 2019. The Obama-era funding ran out in 2019. How did they get more money and a second 4 years?

The Trump Administration re-upped the grant.

Ooops. I guess if you're continue with your easily disproved conspiracy, it's actually Trump's fault (but it's not, becasue it's BS).

So basically if you don't agree with their politics they aren't a good source? No, that's not how it works. You should be focusing on verifying/debunking the facts they present otherwise we'll simply negate all sources brought forward by either side.

Your sources are all left leaning and not credible.

However I did go through a bunch of articles and searched the facts. The 3.7 Million was split up between a lot of different labs, but they sent the virus to the Wuhan Lab knowing they did not follow proper safety protocols.

Yep, GW Bush is just as guilty as Fauci and to an extent Obama, but Obama did the right thing when he made it illegal to do gain of function research in the US. At that point Fauci sent the virus to a number of labs (including Wuhan).

Yep, Trump re-upped the grant. One of the few legitimate criticisms that can be brought against him. The issue is he didn't know the details of what was going on.

The facts are that Fauci transfered the virus and funding over to Wuhan and then Wuhan released it to the public.

USA Today is a non-partisan news outlet. They pride themselves on not having a bias. It's like the Associated Press and Reuters.

Anti-vaxx isn't politics.

It's anti-science. It's anti-intelligence. It's murder.

It's condemning people to death or a life of pain and disfigurement from diseases that are preventable.

Anyone who is an anti-vaxxer should be dismissed as an idiot because they are a f**king idiot.

So, when an Anti-Vax site says that the virus was "off-shored" to be produced I know that they're dumb and can't be relied upon to pour piss out of a boot with the instructions written on the heel.

The virus was not created in a lab. It was not sent to Wuhan.

This is conspiracy theory nonsense being peddled to you by the same people who want you to believe that Hlllary Clinton is running a satanic pedo ring from the basement of a pizza place where you can order a kid via a discount furniture website. (and a co-founder is Tom Hanks).

"USA Today is a non-partisan news outlet. They pride themselves on not having a bias. It's like the Associated Press and Reuters.

Anti-vaxx isn't politics.

It's anti-science. It's anti-intelligence. It's murder.

It's condemning people to death or a life of pain and disfigurement from diseases that are preventable.

Anyone who is an anti-vaxxer should be dismissed as an idiot because they are a f**king idiot.

So, when an Anti-Vax site says that the virus was "off-shored" to be produced I know that they're dumb and can't be relied upon to pour piss out of a boot with the instructions written on the heel.

The virus was not created in a lab. It was not sent to Wuhan.

This is conspiracy theory nonsense being peddled to you by the same people who want you to believe that Hlllary Clinton is running a satanic pedo ring from the basement of a pizza place where you can order a kid via a discount furniture website. (and a co-founder is Tom Hanks)."

The first issue is that almost no one is 'anti-vaxx'. We are pro science, pro truth, and the facts are that vaccines barely protect you and have a ton of really bad side effects. In some cases they might be needed, but in most (like the flu) they are worthless or deadly.
If they sold a 'clean' vaccine that had nothing in it but a weakened version of the strain of virus, then most of us wouldn't be averse to taking them. What we object to is all the chemicals a biologicals added to vaccines.

Lokiare don't waste any more of your time air whistling through his empty cranium. That's how libtards operate. You could see that coolaid vomit coming a mile away when he asked for "accredited institutions". LOL. If Obama was on film raping a nun and robbing a bank, leftist zealots like this would exercise their cognitive dissonance by saying FOX NEWS or OAN camera man, right wing, conspiracy theory, not accredited, unverified by additional cameras, instead of acknowledging whats plainly on the video. Usually they quote the same article used by FB's fake left wing fact checkers they go off on a mumbo jumbo saying not all of the money went directly to the lab but to multple firms who do work at the lab but whose total work is not limited to the lab. Today FB's fake left winf political fact checkers declared the first hand eye witness account from an epidemiologist that was interviewed on Tucker "false information." Same thing with America's Frontier doctors, board certified physicians with actual experience treating CV patients "fact checked" and "debunked" by a room full of liberal journalists that wouldn't know their own anus from their epiglottis.

"Lokiare don't waste any more of your time air whistling through his empty cranium. That's how libtards operate. You could see that coolaid vomit coming a mile away when he asked for "accredited institutions". LOL. If Obama was on film raping a nun and robbing a bank, leftist zealots like this would exercise their cognitive dissonance by saying FOX NEWS or OAN camera man, right wing, conspiracy theory, not accredited, unverified by additional cameras, instead of acknowledging whats plainly on the video. Usually they quote the same article used by FB's fake left wing fact checkers they go off on a mumbo jumbo saying not all of the money went directly to the lab but to multple firms who do work at the lab but whose total work is not limited to the lab. Today FB's fake left winf political fact checkers declared the first hand eye witness account from an epidemiologist that was interviewed on Tucker "false information." Same thing with America's Frontier doctors, board certified physicians with actual experience treating CV patients "fact checked" and "debunked" by a room full of liberal journalists that wouldn't know their own anus from their epiglottis."

I'm mostly doing it for the people reading the comments so they don't think that what this person is saying is true.