Imgflip Logo Icon

What is in the vaccine. How was it made so quickly, and should we blindly inject ourselves with it?

What is in the vaccine. How was it made so quickly, and should we blindly inject ourselves with it? | Trump ll RNC ll 2020: 

"Most importantly we are marshaling the nation's scientific genius to produce a vaccine in record time... Under operation Warpspeed, we have three different vaccines in the final stage of trials...Years ahead of what has been achieved before. Nobody thought it could ever be done this fast... My very concerned question is:; WHAT IS THE VIRUS MADE OUT OF, THAT THIS VACCINE COULD BE MADE SO FAST? The Ebola Virus struck on March 25, 2014. A vaccine was produced in December 2019...Roughly 4 years. The H3N2 Virus stuck in 1968. A vaccine was produced using MANY other vaccine strands in 2005 and 2006...Roughly 38 years until an efficient vaccine was found. THE SPANISH-FLU STARTED IN 1918 AND ENDED IN 1920. A VACCINE WAS DEVELOPED IN 1945 AND WAS DISTRIBUTED TO CIVILIANS THE FOLLOWING YEAR. MY POINT IN LISTING THE TIMES OF WHEN MAJOR VIRUSES AROSE AND WHEN VACCINES FOR THOSE VIRUSES WERE FOUND, IS THE EXTREME TIME DIFFERENCE BETWEEN VACCINE DEVELOPMENT EFFICIENCY THAN AND NOW. I AM NOT INJECTING MYSELF WITH A VIRUS THAT DOES NOT HAVE A DOUBLE-PLACEBO TEST AND HAS ONLY TAKEN 6 MONTHS TO DEVELOP AND MANUFACTURE. THINK FOR YOURSELF, WOULD YOU INJECT YOURSELF WITH SOMETHING YOU DON'T KNOW THE CONTENTS OF JUST BECAUSE OF FEAR? | image tagged in blank white template | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
236 views 3 upvotes Made by Frush91_novai 5 years ago in politics
26 Comments
2 ups, 5y,
1 reply
Ebola became known since 1976 and the vaccine was approved in late 2019. A good 43 years later. So we had a bit of a jump start when there was a resurgence outbreak in 2014. The same could be said of Covid-19 since it is a Coronavirus, similar to the SARS-CoV from 2003.

It took 27 years to develop a vaccine for Spanish Influenza in 1918
It took 38 years to develop a vaccine for H3N2 in 1945
It took 43 years to develop a vaccine for Ebola in 2014

It may take 6 months to a year to develop a vaccine for Covid-19 in 2020.

Rather than this be because they are able to develop one so fast because it was "man-made" it is likely that the reason is because it has the funding and the priority it needs to move testing forward. Advanced technology may also be a contributing factor.

If you don't like Octavia_Melody's car analogy... think of it like this... (Especially if you're not a fan of the likes of Bill Gates, I'm sure this may tickle your fancy.)

1918 was 38 years before the creation of the first hard drive.
1945 was 11 years before the creation of the first hard drive.
1956 was the creation of the first hard drive which had a capacity of 5MB.
1980 was the first time hard drives reached a capacity of 1GB, 24 years later.
2007 was the first time hard drives reached a capacity of 1TB, 27 years later.

And we're estimated to see the first 1PB hard drive in about 5 years, about 18 years later.

It can be reasoned that with the faster processing of data there may be a reason why we may be able to more quickly develop a vaccine for this virus. Maybe not to inject some kind of malicious tracking device rendered ultimately redundant by mobile phones, or some other nefarious means.

And even then, experts were saying months ago that it could still be 4-5 years before an effective vaccine is developed for Covid-19.
0 ups, 5y,
1 reply
Well of course. I do believe that we have greater technology, yes.

But there is a great issue with all of this. If the government allows things like 5 g towers which let off extreme radiation and mess up bodily patters through frequencies, then I wouldn't trust them to stick metal into me and give me a dead virus that I already have complete immunity to.

Did you know that there is a great possibility that 50% of America had already had an immunity to COVID, because of past viruses like it?

Plus, if none of the above is true, it doesn't matter. People up to the age of 60 without pre-existing conditions experience COVID like the cold.
2 ups, 5y,
1 reply
Do you know what G in 5G stands for?
0 ups, 5y,
1 reply
Yes, I do. 5g itself does not cause cancer, the towers themselves do, plus the machines that use them.
2 ups, 5y,
1 reply
You say you understand what the G stands for but you did not explain what it stands for so I'll assume you don't since you also don't know that there isn't any conclusive evidence that cellphone towers cause cancer.

A new generation of cellular standards has appeared approximately every tenth year since 1G systems were introduced in 1979. Each generation is characterized by new frequency bands, higher data rates and non–backward-compatible transmission technology.

1G was an analog telecommunication system that was established in 1979. It typically modulated to frequencies of 150 MHz and up.

2G was a digital communication system that was established in 1991. It not only modulated to higher frequencies but enabled more users per frequency band. It also provided a theoretical maximum transfer speed of 40 kbit/s.

3G referred to wireless mobile telecommunications technologies that became commercially available by 2001. It commonly operated on a bandwidth of 2,100 MHz. It's transfer speed was at least 144 kbit/s.

4G referred to broadband cellular network technology. It had an even wider range of frequencies that enabled more users per frequency band. It's fastest transfer speed anywhere between 50-500 Mbit/s.

5G is the natural progression of the standards offered by 4G, now offering GHz speeds, instead of just MHz; and Gbit/s instead of Mbit/s transfer.

In short, G or Generation, is just the acknowledgement of the advancing technologies. Usually in the congruence of faster transfer of data and wider band of frequencies of which to select where you want the data to go.
0 ups, 5y,
1 reply
Well, all of the first paragraphs was a complete assumption. Let's say I don't know, that doesn't mean all of a sudden that 5G gives cancer and messes up bodily frequencies.

I don't know what else to say, it causes cancer, it is bad for humans. This is not debatable and has been proven.
2 ups, 5y,
1 reply
Proven by whom?
0 ups, 5y,
1 reply
I am not even going to attempt to argue with you on basic facts. Look it up for yourself.
2 ups, 5y,
1 reply
In logic, you can only prove if something does exist, otherwise it does not. I realize you're a person of faith, but this isn't about faith. This is science, which means that you must adhere to the realm of logic. And logic states that in order for something to exist, like evidence that cell towers cause cancer, then you must need proof to back up that claim, otherwise it is a lie.

Here is what I've found from my own research. This website contains a lot of information bundled up here so I wouldn't be too quick to dismiss it. That will just make you look like a science denier. What you can do is find counter-claims... which if your claim is true, then you should be easily able to provide the evidence for which I ask.

https://www.cancer.org/cancer/cancer-causes/radiation-exposure/cellular-phone-towers.html

In summary:

"Some people have expressed concern that living, working, or going to school near a cell phone tower might increase the risk of cancer or other health problems. At this time, there isn't a lot of evidence to support this idea. Still, more research is needed to be sure."

They acknowledge that there is concern and risk, but so far there hasn't been any conclusive evidence over the last 50 years. In fact, cell phone towers put out less radiation frequencies than microwaves. So until we pass THz, we're not even technically in uncharted territory. And even then, THz are not on the ionized radiation spectrum (Or harmful radiation).

So, if you do not provide the evidence to back that up, then you're only unwittingly acknowledging that cell phone towers don't cause cancer.
0 ups, 5y,
1 reply
I know that, but people like you don't "adhere" to the truth. I can give you a million articles, and you won't be convinced.

No, I actually don't need to answer. I have argued with you before, and I am not wasting my time trading blows.

Proverbs 26:4-14 Don't answer the foolish arguments of fools, or you will become as foolish as they are.
2 ups, 5y
As I predicted. You have nothing.

So, you willingly concede the argument that there is no evidence that cell phone towers are harmful in anyway.

It was a pleasure arguing with you.
[deleted]
2 ups, 5y,
3 replies
0 ups, 5y
Or maybe it's the difference between driving an automatic all your life and being given a stick shift and sent out into traffic.

Either way I'm rooting for a vaccine but I'm not putting it in my bloodstream.
0 ups, 5y
That is not enough. The very fact that a popular eugenicist is funding one of these vaccines (with millions upon millions) troubles me. The Corona-virus already proves to have a great deal of evidence to be created and released, rather than natural and occurring.

With that evident knowledge, I am not about to inject a vaccine with little to no knowledge of its ingredients.
Normal vaccines for the flu and the cold already have preservatives that are horrible for the human body and can even double your chances of getting the (disease, virus, etc.) sickness.
What do you think the kind of things that is in a vaccine funded by one of the greatest supports and enders of life, Bill Gates?!
0 ups, 5y,
1 reply
I just cannot trust them. The only one I can trust with these life or death things is God. No one else.
[deleted]
0 ups, 5y,
2 replies
2 ups, 5y,
1 reply
That is a good question and a bad question at the same time.

This is going to be hard to explain to someone who does not have knowledge of God.

God wants the best for us but allows us to have free will. If God chooses for me to not get sick, I won't get sick. If he allows me to get sick, I'll get sick. He can use the medicine I take to work his will.
[deleted]
1 up, 5y,
5 replies
0 ups, 5y
t, they could not follow him and him alone.
0 ups, 5y
There are many other examples of God showing that he is the one true God. I will give you articles to these, because I just spent 45 minutes writing 25 verses.
0 ups, 5y
voice. No one answered; no one paid attention. Then Elijah said to all the people, "Come near to me." And all the people came near to him. And he prepared the altar of the Lord that had been thrown down. Elijah took twelve stones, according to the number of the tribes of the sons of Jacob ((the tribes of Israel)), to whom the word of the Lord came, saying, "Israel shall be your name," and with the stones he built an altar in the name of the Lord. And he made a trench about the altar, as great as would contain two seahs of seed. And he put the wood in order and cut the bull in pieces and laid it on the wood. And he said,"Fill four jars with water and pour it on the burnt offering and on the wood," And he said, "Do it a second time," And they did it a second time. And he said, "Do it a third time." And they did it a third time. And the water ran around the altar and filled the trench also with water. And at the time of the offering of the oblation, Elijah the prophet came near and said, "O Lord, God of Abraham, Isaac, and Israel, let it be known this day that you are God in Israel, and that I am your servant, and that I have done all these things at your word. Answer me, O Lord, answer me, that this people may know that you, O Lord, are God, and that you have turned their hearts back." Then the fire of the Lord fell and consumed the burnt offering and the wood and the stones and the dust, and licked up the water that was in the trench. And when all the people saw it, they fell on their faces and said. "The Lord, he is God, the Lord, he is God." And Elijah said to them, "Seize the prophets of Baal; let not one of them escape." And they seized them. And Elijah brought them down to the brook Kishon and slaughtered them there.

Now, you may be wondering, if the "gods" were completely fake, then why did God care?
First of all, the "gods" are not gods at all. They are representations of fake distractions made by demons. When Lucifer (or Satan) revolted against God and convinced many Angels to follow him, he pretty much committed himself to "kill, steal, and destroy." He also committed himself to turn everyone possible away from God. These idols that people worshiped were not gods at all, but demons meant to distract the Israelites from the one true God. There is something you have to understand, though. The Israelites were supposed to be a nation unlike any other. They were supposed to not indulge in the worlds sinful ways. But, even when God was literally presen
0 ups, 5y
Sorry I had to start a new section let me finish before you respond.
0 ups, 5y
That is the issue with you. You don't know God so you don't know why I believe him so.

When you come to the truth that everything could not have just been an accident, you have to acknowledge that there is a creator.
But, good question. Which one?

There are very good examples in the Bible of this.

Before I give you an example, I will tell you that God knows that people think that we should share gods and that no gods are better than other gods. So, to prove that he is the only God existent and the Lord God Almighty, he crushes these pagan Gods, showing in broad daylight that: "There are no Gods before me."

Example: Elijah and the Priests of Baal (This is skipping some major story since I have to type most of this chapter, for the main point to be made).
1 Kings 18:20-40
So Ahab sent to all the people of Israel and gathered the prophets together at Mount Carmel. And Elijah came near to all the people and said, "How long will you go limping between two different opinions? If the Lord is God, follow him; but if Baal, then follow him" And the people did not answer him a word. Then Elijah said to the people, "I even only, am left a prophet of the Lord, but Baal's prophets are 450 men. Let two bulls be given to us, and let them choose one bull for themselves and cut it into pieces and lay it on the wood, but put no fire to it. And I will prepare the other bull and lay it on the wood and put no fire to it. And you call upon the name of your god, and I will call upon the name of The Lord, and the God who answers by fire, he is God." And all the people answered, "It is well spoken." Then Elijah said to the prophets of Baal, "Choose for yourselves one bull and prepare it first, for you are many, and call upon the name of your god, but put no fire to it." And they they took the bull that was given to them and they prepared it and called upon the name of Baal from morning until noon, saying, "O Baal, answer us!" But there was no voice, and no one answered. And they limped around the altar that they had made. And at noon Elijah, mocking them saying, "Cry aloud, for he is a god Wither he is musing, or he is relieving himself, or he is on a journey, or perhaps he is asleep and must be awakened(😴😴🤫😂)." And they cried aloud and cut themselves after their custom with swords and lances, until the blood gushed out upon them. As midday passed, they raved on until the time of midday passed, they raved until the time of the offering of the olbation, but there was no
1 up, 5y,
1 reply
I do trust God greatly. One day, I will go to the unreasonable mobs that are destroying America and TRY to reason. I will evangelize if it is what God seeks. If it is, he will protect me. If it isn't then I won't go in the first place.
[deleted]
0 ups, 5y,
1 reply
0 ups, 5y
No one ever said God was a divine butler and would always keep you safe. If God wanted someone to come HOME then if that person didn't die of natives, then a monkey would kill him, and if not the monkey, then the spider.

If God wanted the person to live in those circumstances, then, since he is the Lord God Almighty, he would be able to do these things.
Created with the Imgflip Meme Generator
EXTRA IMAGES ADDED: 3
  • download (1).jpeg
  • Blank White Template
  • Blank White Template
  • Blank White Template
  • IMAGE DESCRIPTION:
    Trump ll RNC ll 2020: "Most importantly we are marshaling the nation's scientific genius to produce a vaccine in record time... Under operation Warpspeed, we have three different vaccines in the final stage of trials...Years ahead of what has been achieved before. Nobody thought it could ever be done this fast... My very concerned question is:; WHAT IS THE VIRUS MADE OUT OF, THAT THIS VACCINE COULD BE MADE SO FAST? The Ebola Virus struck on March 25, 2014. A vaccine was produced in December 2019...Roughly 4 years. The H3N2 Virus stuck in 1968. A vaccine was produced using MANY other vaccine strands in 2005 and 2006...Roughly 38 years until an efficient vaccine was found. THE SPANISH-FLU STARTED IN 1918 AND ENDED IN 1920. A VACCINE WAS DEVELOPED IN 1945 AND WAS DISTRIBUTED TO CIVILIANS THE FOLLOWING YEAR. MY POINT IN LISTING THE TIMES OF WHEN MAJOR VIRUSES AROSE AND WHEN VACCINES FOR THOSE VIRUSES WERE FOUND, IS THE EXTREME TIME DIFFERENCE BETWEEN VACCINE DEVELOPMENT EFFICIENCY THAN AND NOW. I AM NOT INJECTING MYSELF WITH A VIRUS THAT DOES NOT HAVE A DOUBLE-PLACEBO TEST AND HAS ONLY TAKEN 6 MONTHS TO DEVELOP AND MANUFACTURE. THINK FOR YOURSELF, WOULD YOU INJECT YOURSELF WITH SOMETHING YOU DON'T KNOW THE CONTENTS OF JUST BECAUSE OF FEAR?