The confessed criminal and his rigged jury running against the aquitted. Will justice prevail?

Remember Joe bragged about how he withheld aid from Ukraine. Kamala thinks that is illegal!

By giving an actual quid pro quo to Ukraine to have the prosecutor fired from investigating his son's corrupt company. HELPING THE WORLD. lol Burisma's American lawyers apologized for framing Shokin as corrupt.

https://thehill.com/opinion/campaign/463307-solomon-these-once-secret-memos-cast-doubt-on-joe-bidens-ukraine-story

We've been over this multiple times but again, you're just sticking with an argument that makes no sense.
1. The timeline does not correspond with your conspiracy theory.
2. There was no investigation going on when Biden made the ultimatum.
3. Because there was no investigation, to make the ultimatum actually increased the chance of an investigation (if there was actually anything on his son)
4. The man was corrupt.
5. He was corrupt and there was no investigation (This would make Biden want to KEEP him in office

You'll have to do much more to convince me that Joe leveling a quid pro quo over a lawyer looking into his crackhead son's company, while he was in charge of watching over Ukraine, isn't ethically wrong. Especially as you argue Trump asking for something and not getting it was impeachable.

You have zero proof the man was corrupt except for allegations. Had Trump done this, you'd be howling... oh wait, he did far less and you howled anyway.

The, "Lawyer" was NOT looking into corruption. That is why the world wanted him removed and why Joe gave the country the ultimatum.

"The world" lmao. Is that like Hillary's 19 intelligence agencies confirming Trump Putin collusion that Mueller couldn't find after 2 years and thousands of interviews? lmfao

The world, meaning the entire free world.

Okay, that's some appeal to fictional popularity.

Why do you even bother responding when you are so clearly wrong?

1. There was no investigation into Biden's son being run
2. The man was corrupt and was not investigating known corruption
3. Biden was doing the work of our nation, requesting the man be removed
4. The entire free world wanted the man removed
5. There can be no quid pro quo when Biden personally got NOTHING for removing the man

Time for you to continue.

You obviously have not read a single stick of evidence regarding this whole fiasco.

Remain ignorant. It's where you thrive.

1. Not if Biden had a say.
2. Prove it. Is that like how all the intelligence agencies said Saddam had WMD? LMAO
3. Prove it
4. Prove it. LMFAO
5. Yeah, he got a prosecutor removed after threatening to withold funds LMFAO x10

You are a f**king hypocrite.

The entire free world wanted the man gone because he was corrupt and not prosecuting corruption. Deny, deny, deny.

Bipartisan report released yesterday regarding Trump/Russia and Manafort's role.

https://www.npr.org/2020/08/18/903512647/senate-report-former-trump-aide-paul-manafort-shared-campaign-info-with-russia

Yeah, yeah, keep trucking with that to excuse Biden's actual quid pro quo.

I think Picard is aptly expressing how most feel about that line of thinking :)