Americans Should Stand Up Against Democrat White Supremacist Nancy Pelosi and Protest For Impeachment

Please yes lol

Half the misery of our times is attributable to this fetid creature. So, you have my vote on that!

Hilarious!

that motherf**ker needs to be out of office

This is true, but people get rallied behind the word "impeach".

Technically, no member of Congress has been removed.

It has to be voted on.

Since she controls the majority of Congress, it will never happen.

The ONLY way it will happen is if enough people protest in the street to call attention on it to where the other Democrats want to distance themselves from her.

Basically, allowing the cancel culture that she helped create, to cancel her out too.

https://imgflip.com/gif/4aaye4

Let's start with who she backs...

Then you have her own supremacy ties...

Then toy have ALL the other evidence...

Prove that she's NOT a racist.

Don't know who you gonna believe.
White Nancy
Or
Her Black Accuser

That's all it takes? You sound like a black supremacist.

Oh, so black supremacists ARE real?
Gosh, last week when I posted a meme about it - I was told that I'm making things up.

Which is it?

Okay, you are strawmanning me here quite a bit. All I said is that saying a black person said something so that must be fact is pretty ridiculous. Don't support the Marxist black supremacist Burn Loot and Murder and I despise Pelosi. But I fail to see how she is a white supremacist. Her party is the anti white party if anything.

Well given the history of her party...
I would say Democrats are the party for the "people of color" is simply NIT true.

Democrats ARE and have always been the party of racism. Just because Edward Bernays took over the public relations and marketing of the Democrat Party in the 1940s to give a spin so they can have a hold over Congress and Senate over the next two hundred years doesn't mean that they are still not racist.
They simply hold onto a mask of public relations very tightly.

Furthermore, Nancy Pelosi hasn't done much for minorities.

Not only that, but she has been caught on hot mic saying racist things.

In conjunction with that, her family has racist ties - especially to the Confederate statues she is allowing to be torn down.

She was/is ALSO a supporter of Robert Byrd, who is a known KKK member.

I'm sure if I took more time, I could find a lot more proof on the statement "Nancy Pelosi is a White Supremacist".

Nonetheless, in this age of 2020...

apparently, some random person can say something on Twitter and it is a fact.

Since the Liberals and Democrats like to USE these rando statements as "fact", I found one and used it as fact against Octavia.

Aside from that one rando statement, there is a slew of other information provided on this thread providing further proof to my argument that Nancy Pelosi is indeed a white supremacist.

Go back and read the entire thread, and you will see that it is certainly not strawman.

However, I agree posting that 1 Twitter screenshot could be considered "strawman".

I'm simply taking somebody's strawman argument and throwing it right back at them using the liberal in 2020 era tactics.

Fair enough. Like Alinsky said, make them live up to their own standards.

I don't take everything I see on "Snopes" as truth considering how biased they are.
Can't find anything else "debunking" other than that.
Can you provide this magical proof from a legitimate source?

There...
There ya go.
That's how you do it.l!
Congratulations.
*golf clap*

I think it's pretty well accepted that it's a Photoshop. Not that he wasn't wearing one once.

You know looking at that picture I posted of the old man holding the KKK hood...
Um... old man Robert - it CERATINLY wasn't taken in the 1940's.

By your theory, Byrd, was 23 when he "left" the KKK. If THAT theory IS indeed true, then WHY is he proudly hooded-up as a person who is at least in their 60's?

The non racist *smirk* "exalted cyclops" spoke out about Clarence Thomas in 1991. Guess he didn't want no blacks mangs as a Supreme Court Justice.

On that note, in reviewing our discourse:

When somebody posts a statement, it is YOUR burden if proof if you disagree with their statement. They don't have to continuously prove their point with cited material.
YOU DO!

THAT'S how debate works.

I don't know if you've ever been involved with forensics, BUT in debate you start with a topic:
i.e. "Nancy Pelosi"

THEN the first person starts with the argument point:
i.e. "Nancy Pelosi is a White Supremacist"

Of course, usually providing proof. (Given this is a meme, the proof is ALL OVER THE INTERNET if one "Octavia" wasn't such a narcissist -they could get off their pedestal for 2 seconds, take their little thumb and open up a new tab on their phone to look up "Nancy Pelosi white supremacist" before offering a counter argument.)

THEN:
When the other person offers their counter argument, they can't simply "how?" nor "this isn't true" and leave it at that.

They actually HAVE to post/state/say that IN CONJUNCTION with facts they have researched AND cite those facts to counter the meme.

Otherwise, you're just a keyboard masturbator i.e. NOT as intelligent as you think you are as you cannot follow the proper format of a debate, and/or a proper discourse.

If one were to take the time to know how to properly debate, then they would know if a person like YOU were to leave a counter statement, the burden of proof is on YOU.

Furthermore, you suggested she's not a white supremacist, the burden of proof is in your hands.

Provide the forum/thread lurkers ALL information YOU can find to prove Nancy Pelosi is NOT a white supremacist.

Otherwise, the meme statement stands as a FACT since I took the time to provide "proof" to back up the "theory" upon your request.
*facepalm*

Again, in debate, when somebody provides "proof" you MUST provide counter proof.
NOT just your opinion, or uncited digital word vomit.

Now you have two things you need to prove:
1. Nancy Pelosi is NOT a white supremacist
2. Byrd wasn't in the KKK as an older man

You can't prove a negative, but you can disprove a positive.
They should be providing sources and facts to counter your sources and facts.

Agreed.

Nonetheless, all I'm recieving is conjecture, and feelings as a counter argument.

*sigh*

Aside from the "fake" stuff...
There is the REAL proof such as her hot mic tirade.
*facepalm*
However, I see why you would want to focus on ONE point and NONE of the other points addressed.
Nonetheless, by YOUR standard of "there's pretty much no way to prove someone isn't a white supremacist"...
Then Trump MUST be a white supremacist and if HE is, so is Nancy because there is NO actual proof of Trump being a racist against Black Americans...
Not even a hot mic tirade and a person's own words as in Nancy's case.
Biden (a candidate she supports) is a white supremacist too considering his documented comments on Black Americans in 1984.
*shrugs*
I suppose it IS easier to prove somebody is...
Rather than isn't.
You are correct about THAT point.