Stalin says

Now you see why the steaming pile of Trump is opposed to mail-in voting during a pandemic?

Because he wants a real election and not one counted by dems?

No, he does not. He has been pushing for voter suppression and low voter turnout. And that's based on his actions, not what the media says.

what? sources please!

https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2020/may/26/donald-trump/no-california-not-sending-mail-ballots-anyone-stat/
https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2020/apr/09/donald-trump/donald-trumps-dubious-claim-thousands-are-conspiri/
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/04/08/us/politics/republicans-vote-by-mail.html
https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefings-statements/remarks-president-trump-vice-president-pence-members-coronavirus-task-force-press-briefing-22/

Lol Politifact.
1st link: irrelevant. https://www.cnn.com/2020/05/08/politics/california-mail-in-voting/index.html
2nd link: Trump never said that. He has said its very dangerous and prone to fraud. Actual reports of fraud that have been investigated show its rampant. https://www.dailysignal.com/2020/05/09/database-swells-to-1285-proven-cases-of-voter-fraud-in-america/
3rd link: I read about half the article. 0 sources or references.
4th link: typical MSM the reporter won't let him answer and when he quotes where the fraud has been proven in court, they ignore it.

The objective facts I posted don't care about your feelings.
1st link: relevant
2nd link: You are ignoring things he actually said and citing a source which actually demonstrates bias in its reporting.
3rd link: Just because the NYT used facts it does not mean you can simply ignore reality.
4th link: The only fraud provable in court is that perpetuated by the steaming pile of Trump. The voter fraud proven in court was statistically insignificant.

Stop spreading disinformation.

Nope more fake news. You've been revealed leftist.

Just because you call actual facts "fake news" it does not make reality go away.

Of course, you're going to ignore objective reality and retort with fake news which is actually provably false, or throw some kind of other dismissal, denial, fallacy, or ad hominem attack.

Oh, and I'm a centrist. I prefer actual facts rather than editorials. My preferred news source is Reuters.

www.reuters.com/trump-effect

Perhaps you failed to read this:
1st link: irrelevant. https://www.cnn.com/2020/05/08/politics/california-mail-in-voting/index.html
2nd link: Trump never said that. He has said its very dangerous and prone to fraud. Actual reports of fraud that have been investigated show its rampant. https://www.dailysignal.com/2020/05/09/database-swells-to-1285-proven-cases-of-voter-fraud-in-america/
3rd link: I read about half the article. 0 sources or references.
4th link: typical MSM the reporter won't let him answer and when he quotes where the fraud has been proven in court, they ignore it.

"Then why have I used objective facts that are vetted and confirmed? You proved my assessment of you correct."

I just proved it wrong.

I'd also like to add that its really sad you copy the NPC meme and put a MAGA hat on it and think you somehow scored points. It really just makes you look worse.

Then why have I used objective facts that are vetted and confirmed? You proved my assessment of you correct.

"nope, I read it. I also provided facts and evidence refuting it. You are using fallacy and being willfully ignorant."

No, you didn't use facts or evidence, you listed articles that have long since been debunked.

nope, I read it. I also provided facts and evidence refuting it. You are using fallacy and being willfully ignorant.

Just saying its facts doesn't make it true. These are long debunked articles. I'm not sure why you posted them.

I am saying they are facts because, yes, they ARE objective facts, and you are willfully ignorant.