By the way, the technology for abortion has always been around.

They were able to suck babies brains out with a vacuum back then, huh? Never knew that.

No, " the tech... has always been around" doesn't mean they had vacuum pumps or refrigeration like the modern clinic. However, the people who practised delivering abortion created devices and tools to perform an abortion long before the established medical profession existed. In a similar fashion to the way a barber was performing surgery such as amputations before doctors..
There unfortunately has always been someone wanting an abortion and often enough been somebody to administer it. The tools of the amateur may have been something as simple as a coat hanger in the last century and whilst I won't claim to be intimately familiar with the arsenal of tools you can be go research their existence in the distant past.

Yeah, I know, I just wanted to throw his vacuum of death in his face. Thanks.

"No, " the tech... has always been around" doesn't mean they had vacuum pumps or refrigeration like the modern clinic." I think you mean "No, " the tech... has always been around" doesn't mean they had vacuum pumps or refrigeration like the modern concentration camp." A clinic is a place where people are given medical treatment, not a slaughterhouse.

Yeah I was thinking they hadn't thought that one out hahaha.

You do see it pushed around sometimes, like abortion is a symptom of our modern decadence enabled by technology going too far. It plays well among certain crowds.

And like all things based on a misconception, there are two types of people - those who go "oh, it's always been a thing? Didn't know that. Well you haven't changed my mind but how interesting, I'll keep that in my head" and those who go "no, you're stupid, that's paid lies being spread by George Soros".

Yeah no. The things Soros pays for are verified because he does it through his charities which are required by law to have open books.

And if the scientists who had held everyone back with incorrect theories and methodologies had been aborted, it might even have taken less time to get there!

You mean like 'scientists' on 'gender' theory?

The ones pushing gender confusion are not scientists.

But how can you tell which one will be which?

You don't. Like, "I'm just trying to accelerate the invention of flying cars" is just not the purpose of the decision. If it were, we'd be throwing all kinds of freebies into the education system to try to maximize the benefit of bringing the next Paul Dirac to term.

Then Liebniz's face would be in your meme where Newton's is.