Imgflip Logo Icon
15 Comments
2 ups, 4y,
1 reply
Nice representation of the heads I win, tails you lose lefty mentality.
3 ups, 4y
and yet that's exactly what dem leaders are saying, and you vote for them so...
0 ups, 4y
Look up the several times this has happened, there are multiple videos and articles.
0 ups, 4y
And I agree,bit is incredibly stupid...
0 ups, 4y,
1 reply
What would you do though. Just say, rob me? You not providing a logical solution.
[deleted]
1 up, 4y,
1 reply
0 ups, 4y,
1 reply
Nice, that's common sense. Liberals should be more vocal that they support the police force, and the contribution that the police make towards a civil society. Without that strong support for a service that is a basic necessity to society, it makes dems lose votes. I wish more dems can openly support the police like you do, and start to sound logical, until then Trump is grabbing votes too easily from the dems.
1 up, 4y,
1 reply
notice the closer a leftist gets to the right the more reasonable they are. too bad they never realise it.
0 ups, 4y
That is very true. Moderate leftists are quite reasonable, but are getting rarer these days as the media polarizes Americans into two camps. It's very concerning.
0 ups, 4y,
1 reply
Clearly you have a deep misunderstanding of what defund the police actually means...
0 ups, 4y,
1 reply
A strong well funded police force is a non negotiable to all good humans with common sense. Trump has an endless source of votes because Dems do not emphasize this truth.
1 up, 4y,
1 reply
No, what is non negotiable to all good humans with common sense is the betterment of society through rehabilitation of those in need of help, and effective services to help with any emergencies.
Setting aside the racist beginnings of the American police, they are entrusted with far too many responsibilities that they are not thoroughly trained for, including mental health calls, drug busts, and domestic calls. The training police do receive is in how to view themselves as predators and how to view the general public as potential prey. They are told that they must be prepared to take a life in any possible circumstance and are not held accountable when excessive force is used. Not only that, but officers that speak out against the lack of accountability are often shamed and scrutinized for criticizing their “brothers” and their careers can be completely destroyed. This is why there are no “good cops”. There are bad cops, and the cops that would have otherwise been good either stay silent or are silenced. All of this put together results in a police force that, at best, is highly ineffective in prevention of drug use, handling of mental health issues, and potentially destructive in domestic abuse cases. At worst, it’s a cult with a superiority complex that’s been given a badge and a license to kill that’s trained to view the rest of the world as potential prey.
Defunding the police would mean that the police departments as we know them would have a single responsibility: responding to emergencies that cannot be handled by other government organizations. Drug offenses would be handled by a new, separate branch. Mental health calls would be handled by trained professionals and field psychologists. Non-violent domestic issues would be handled by trained counselors. Hell, even traffic stops would be handled by specialized officers similar to but separate from the cops. Violent crimes, robberies, and other situation where people are in immediate danger would still be handled by the cops, but not without a complete change in the way they’re trained. The Police Unions would not have so much power that officers cannot be held accountable for wrongdoings, and the “good cops” that we so rarely see would actually be given a voice and praised for their bravery in being able to hold themselves, their superiors, their colleagues, and their precinct accountable. This is what defund the police means.
0 ups, 4y
Every country has a police force. Digging into "racist beginnings" seems a little irrelevant now, eg school systems in colonial countries often favored the colonialists at first, this doesnt mean modern budgets should be adjusted because of the racist roots. Every country needs a police force, simple as that. Every dept in the police force needs a budget, eg detectives, drugs, street presence etc etc. Weaken any one dept, and you weaken that particular essential service. (that's pretty obvious)

Sure there are many other needs in society, that's a non - negotiable as well, I agree. And some of those are neglected. But to take from police funding, when those depts already have a budget for a reason seems a little idealistic and risky. One should look at the entire national budget, and redistribute the funds according to national priorities. (that's pretty obvious too). Makes sense?
0 ups, 4y
Pick one!
Created with the Imgflip Meme Generator
IMAGE DESCRIPTION:
YOU WANT TO DEFUND THE POLICE; YUP; NO, GUNS CAUSE VIOLENCE; SO WE CAN USE FIREARMS FOR SELF-DEFENSE? SO WHAT DO WE DO IF WE'RE BEING ROBBED? CALL THE POLICE