Looking for that Supreme Court case that will shut up your Second Amendment absolutist friend? Well: Here it is.

How concealable a gun is has zero basis on how deadly it is. SBR laws are f**king retarded. Not to mention if short barreled rifles are so much more dangerous because they’re easier to conceal, then the fact that rifle rounds lose velocity in shorter barrels making it theoretically less deadly…they should cancel each other out on the dangerous level scale and just be treated as normal damn rifles

lol, what? I'm confused. I don't see how a shotgun can't contribute to the common defense just cause it's a few inches shorter.

Ok I just don't get it. I can't wrap my head around this. So would you like to see people with 105mm anti-tank guns? Cause that's a liiiiittle over 18 inches and I'm sure it could "contribute". (please don't try and make an assumption on whether or not I would like to see that based on this)