But That's None Of My Business

Because the police aren't allowed to execute people who have been to jail, for the four thousandth time.

Choose your adventure for why summary executions of suspects by agents of the state are illegal and unconstitutional.

As for Floyd:

Yes, he did the crime and he did his time. At the time of his death, he had recently lost his job due to the pandemic and was perhaps passing counterfeit bills to get by. He also may have struggled with a drug addiction as do millions of Americans.

None of these offenses separately or together warrant what Derek Chauvin did to end his life.

So I suggest you spare some of your outrage for the cop.

sLaVe oWnErS wErE BaD, bUt So WaS gEoRgE fLoYd, CHecKmAtE LiBtArDs!”

but people are naming parks and streets after a criminal

And? They’re naming it after George Floyd because he was unfairly killed by police violence, and the catalyst to the protests. Whether he had past crimes is completely irrelevant. Police should not be the judge, jury, and executioner

And you're upset that they're being named after a guy who committed aggravated robbery, served his time, reformed himself, got involved with his local ministry and was then murdered by the police, rather than being named after what? Slave traders?

how do you know "he reformed himself"

It was reported on, have you read anything about him that doesn't have a right-wing bias?

how is "right win bias" thats literally the facts. He should have been in jail that day

What are you talking about? Read what I actually said, I suggested you read something about him that isn't biased, you might learn something. He served a 5 year sentence.
Stop being so lazy and do some research.

doesnt mean he "reformed" himself. He was doing a criminal act at the time of his death. I'm not saying he should have died but he was high on drugs and was using a fake 20 dollar bill. So dont give me that reform bull shit

There's no evidence that he knew it was fake.

but he was still doing it. even if its on accident it is still a crime

Are you trying to argue that a crime done without knowledge or intent is equivalent to one done with knowledge and intent?

If an old white lady had been high on her prescription drugs and accidentally used a fake note she'd been passed, do you think the outcome would've been the same?