Anti American Matt Gaetz reveals himself as a pro censorship doofus

Like?

Yes. You can't just say something without substantiating it.

How? This should very easy for you to answer, given your confidence. This is an intentional defection from my question. Even if you were to prove that I was biased, that doesn't prove that what I said is incorrect.

It is highly likely that your interpretation of my meme is tainted by your own bias. I could argue like this for basically anything. This is extremely unproductive. Claiming that I'm biased without evidence contributes very little to this conversation.

Well, if I'm biased for holding a political belief, than you're biased for holding a political belief. Hell, everyone is biased for holding a political belief! What a groundbreaking discovery! See, this is why I think this is unproductive. It is a distraction from the actual content of my meme. If you want to doubt the validity of my meme, I'm not gonna stop you. Go right ahead.

1. Sometimes comments don't have a reply option so I reply to my own comment. Other times, like the one before, I had to add an argument.

2. You said that I had a well-established leftist bias, meaning that you are implying my bias from the fact that i am a leftist, a political belief.

3. I made the claim that you were biased in the application of the bias argument because personally saw many of your comments on biased, right wing memes. I have never seen you explicitly question the validity of a right wing meme. I could probably spend hours digging up specific comments of yours explicitly praising right wing biased memes if I really wanted to. However, that is extremely time consuming and I have to sleep anyway. Again, if what I've said is wrong, provide a specific example of where you questioned a right wing meme for their perceived bias. I'm not afraid to point out inaccuracies in left leaning memes if they make an inaccuracy.

4. It is impossible for my source to be biased towards Matt Gaetz because it is literally the Matt Gaetz official website. Are you assuming that my source agrees with me without any further research? If you did minimal research, you would find out that my source does NOT agree with me, I just screenshoted the headline.

Also, I believe that your interpretation/observation (whatever you want to call it idrc) is biased is because you probably don't apply this standard of questioning someone simply for holding a bias for people you agree with. You probably up vote or leave a positive comment, even if it is abundantly clear that the creator of the meme is biased. If this is a mischaracterizatuon of what you do, then my bad, but I'm fairly confident that you only invoke the bias observation for memes you don't agree with.

Examples plz

You can have free speech and still face repercussions. I can freely yell fire in a crowded theater but will face the consequences. Let the bitches kneel and then pull their funds. They can still kneel as a poor person too. Same for any sport. Take away their millions but let them kneel. We will see then how committed they feel. Just ask LaBron with China. He stfu fast when faced with losing money.

Letting the government disincentivize people for kneeling by pulling funds is by definition abridging freedom of speech/expression and deeply unconstitutional. The whole point of free speech is that the government cannot penalize you for simply speaking out.