THINGS YOU WILL NEVER HEAR A LIBERTARIAN ADMIT

147 views • 2 upvotes • Made by Truth88 5 years ago in politics
things you will never hear a libertarian admit
9 Comments
lokiare
2 ups, 5y, 1 reply
Nope. You can be as offended as you want.
Truth88
0 ups, 5y, 1 reply
they want no consequences, which is why they cry anytime they can't go to a debate, or get kicked off social media for their racist/fascist ideas.
lokiare
2 ups, 5y, 1 reply
By they do you mean Libertarians? If so you are way off base. Libertarians welcome debate.

Getting kicked off social media for racist/fascist ideas has nothing to do with libertarianism.

Libertarianism is about person freedoms as long as you don't interfere with someone else's freedoms.

So speaking whatever ideas you want on social media doesn't bother them at all.

Do you instead mean liberal? What people call liberal these days are really leftists which is the far left political spectrum which is actually socialism and communism. They have issues with people saying anything that doesn't agree with them.
low rated comment (click to show)
Truth88
0 ups, 5y, 1 reply
lokiare
1 up, 5y, 1 reply
Mmmm no. They aren't suing for that. They are suing for discrimination. It doesn't matter if they are spreading fascism, socialism, or communism, or God forbid free market capitalism and democracy. It matters that they are being silenced unequally with others on their platforms.

Most people don't understand this:

First they came for the socialists, and I did not speak out—

     Because I was not a socialist.

Then they came for the trade unionists, and I did not speak out—

     Because I was not a trade unionist.

Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out—

     Because I was not a Jew.

Then they came for me—and there was no one left to speak for me.

First they came for Alex Jones, then they came for conservatives, and now they are coming for middle of the road liberal democrats. When they come for you will there be anyone left to defend you?
Truth88
0 ups, 5y, 1 reply
https://www.politico.com/blogs/under-the-radar/2016/08/judge-rejects-suit-against-presidential-debate-commission-226720

There are dozens of examples of them suing a private group, to say they should be able to participate. Thus they want the GOVERNMENT To force this private group to let them participate, so they can stand on stage and say why the government should not be able to force private groups to let people participate.

Here is the first one of hundreds of search results.
lokiare
0 ups, 5y, 1 reply
Its not a private group. They take government money and facilitate communications on a scale only rivaled by the phone companies. For all intents and purposes they are the public square. The supreme court already ruled on this. Even if the public square is private owned. Then they still have to allow free speech.
Truth88
0 ups, 5y, 1 reply
yep, a private group.

You want the Government to force the private group to let you debate. That's what I said. The opposite of libertarianism. You morons hate it when your own ideas are inflicted back on you.
lokiare
0 ups, 5y
A private group propped up by the government running the communications of people all over the country. The same legal basis that we broke up Bell telephone company for.

Here's the deal, I wouldn't care if they never featured people they don't like on their front page or whatever, but totally kicking people off is illegal.
Show More Comments
Caption this Meme
Created with the Imgflip Meme Generator
IMAGE DESCRIPTION:
MY IDEA OF FREE SPEECH IS THAT I CAN SAY ANYTHING AND NO ONE IS ALLOWED TO BE OFFENDED