Jesus, will they stop at nothing? Google and Facebook: The first evil sheetzes against the wall ven da revolushin comes

So, I'm doing an experiment to see if this is true. I'm not going to share the video nor am I going to publish it. I am clearly marking what the video is and if it gets taken down, I'll let you know. I'll be posting screenshots daily.

Made a stream so I can debunk this claim without taking up my posts in Politics.

imgflip.com/i/42s6ot?nerp=1590432162

Stream here:

imgflip.com/m/Plandemic-in-GDrive

Actually... what's causing the video to be deleted is that it's getting flagged by the algorithm for being either shared too many times or for being published. If you look in the terms of agreement, published material gets scrutinized more than private material. If you don't believe me, upload your video of Plandemic to your account and then don't do anything. Let it sit there. You can view it as many times as you like but once it's download numbers go up to more than say 1000 IPs a day. Poof. There it goes. This is done primarily to prevent illegally downloaded movies from being shared.

The reason facebook and youtube have been cracking down on the video is due to the numerous misinformation found within it. The last time there was this much misinformation being shared across facebook and youtube, the FCC had a field day with them. So, mostly to protect themselves from potential legal battles in the future, it makes perfect sense why they're taking those videos down.

"Misinformation." According to Official Sources. At least you admit that Big Brother has the right to make his Ministry of Truth determinations.

If this had been some "insider tells all about Trump" thing, you know perfectly well the ACLU would be screaming like a b*tch, but they maintain stunning double standards how.

Preposterous how people claim they have the right to watch and make determinations and think for themselves.

So, you didn’t upload a copy of the video to your personal google drive, I take it?

No privacy is absolute, the backdoors on most computers allow them to be read as long as (1) they're connected to a power source even while off and (2) they're in range of a 3g network, but yes, I don't let either of those two evil empires control or index my data. The teaser/promo copy I downloaded locally. Didn't finish watching yet, but it was obvious as hell after the first two minutes the doctor in the first five minutes all but certainly had way more technical competence in the field than those who would be her detractors. Had you seen it yet yourself?

Two minutes to figure, five for confidence, you get the idea.

So, you didn’t even finish watching the video before staking a claim on it? Tsk tsk tsk. I admit, I have a collection of media that is banned by governments and religions around the world. Books mostly. Some times I do collect a movie or two. Like the theatrical edit of Star Wars, or a tv-episode like the recently scrubbed Simpson’s episode featuring Michael Jackson.

If you’re unwilling to preform the experiment to test of your freedom is being exploited, I’m more than happy to fall on that grenade for you.

I don’t usually get my information from videos. And I use to find YouTube conspiracy videos enjoyable until they became to repetitious, and their audience couldn’t tell the difference between facts and fiction. I once called them modern science fiction but now I think they’re more akin to science porn. Not actual science but great guilty pleasures that an intellectual mind should take with a grain of salt, if at all.

I watched about ten minutes. Which is apparently ten minutes more than you did. Snarky repartee parried ;-)

And I expect you understand the existence of fluff conspiracy does nothing to disprove the substantial stuff. If we have different experiences in that respect, we have different experiences. I am more than content enough with my answers for the sometimes ridiculous stock dismissals of "tinfoil hattery" to all but totally disregard them. I consider myself capable of making critical judgments for myself.

Don't passively sign away your right to do the same either. The stolen rights of others you approve can just as easily be taken from you in reversed circumstances.

I think you may want to avoid the word ‘confidence’ when it comes to describing your experience with watching it. An educational video doesn’t usually inspire such things but rather simply informs.

Kind of a petulance. I clearly imply based on the first third or half I had confidence in the informing that remained to be done by the balance. Which again was more direct basis than you claimed for yourself.

And I obviously plan to watch the rest too, but I enjoy no paid vacation luxuries at this time.

It wasn’t my intention to be petulant. I simply do not factor feelings into an equation until after the fact. Then I acknowledge a bias, and try to leave it out if I’m in the midst of a debate.

There is no balance in facts. It is either substantiated or non-substantiated. Your level of confidence is irrelevant unless you’re prone to being conned is what I mean.

I suggest you re-watch the video from the beginning with a more objective mindset. Be skeptical. Remain skeptical. Follow up on it’s sources. Then form an opinion. How you feel about an informative video minutes in is irrelevant.

I already explained to you that that's what I did.

"Feelings" never entered into it.

I for my part suggest you watch it at all.

Apologies for the delete/repost. I accidentally said twitter was taking these down. And a quick search says... yes, yes they are. Woof.