PROTEST AGAINST LOCKDOWN!

Actually I'm libertarian, but I do like individualist anarchist, not red-anarchist who are nothing but Marxist using an anarchist front. I stand for liberty, unlike you, who wants to be healthy in a cage.

I don't actually. If you bothered to read my comments you'd know I'm against many things the Democratic governors are doing. I do understand why they think they're necessary especially when there are people who are ignoring the issue rather than trying to minimize it's impacts.

Again, I'm against releasing violent criminals.

I'm against fines for disobeying ordinances.

And I'm against locking people up for assembling.

I still wear a mask in public when I go grocery shopping every three-four weeks.

I'm also libertarian but I don't think people with opposing opinions based on facts are dangerous. Nor would I say people with differing political opinions effect my opinion of their intelligence. Maybe anarchist, but if they believe in even a modicum need for government then I don't really mind.

If this is true, you should be attacking authoritarians, instead of people like me, who only advocate liberty. The point of my memes is to get people not to be ruled over by silly false models.

I don't attack anyone based on their political opinions. I attack people who make factual errors, or generalizations. Just because we share some overlap in a political philosophy doesn't mean we'll always agree with each other.

I'm not sure what you mean by false models. Are you talking about the statistical data which proves that this crisis is happening or are you referring to people who are wearing a mask?

No, I'm talking about the Neil Ferguson model, that this is all based on. Which was not only wrong, but this guy has a history of being wrong. I suggest you do your homework. Remember, this was the same model that originally claimed Covid-19 would take out 2.2 million people.

I'm aware of the Neil Ferguson model. He is not the sole reason why everyone across the globe are taking this seriously. The statistics alone prove this virus has a higher than normal fatality rate among infected. Most seasonal flu only have a .3% virus at the very least, this is the first virus in the US in over 100 years that has a fatality rate of 1% or higher. That means at least one in hundred infected will die. If every person were infected with Covid-19 in the United States, that is potentially 30 million deaths.

Ferguson's model, though highly questionable, only claims less than a tenth of that will die. Likely calculating those at risk such as the elderly and those with diabetes. 47 million make up the elderly in the US and 1.2 million make up those with type-1 diabetes. It is far more likely his model takes this into account to allow people to plan accordingly. Even if you dismiss the Ferguson model, which I think you should as there are far too many variables to hold it reliable, you can at least follow the fatality rate as it fluctuates to determine how much of a risk there is in being exposed to the virus as well exposing other to it.

At this time, we do not know the final fatality rate so it is not recommended to factor population into it as the number of people could increase, and allow the fatality rate to hopefully drop or unfortunately increase.

There you go talking too much again. You must hate Haiku poems. lol I'm not going to keep talking, since you just proved you don't know what your talking about. I will tell you this, someone told me on the side, that your a trouble making troll, so you're on ignore. BYE!

Unfortunately, blocking me doesn't really prevent me from commenting on your memes or replying to your comments.