"Her failure to win the presidency nonetheless due to the geographic distribution of said votes wouldn’t happen in any other country in the world"

Well yes but there are other systems which could produce a similar result through preference systems which are not geographically related but produce the same end result.

In a 2 party preferred system, where you have one candidate who gets the highest number votes and then a 2nd highest vote scorer. And there are then say 4 candidates who scored a share of total votes. They then have preferences for where their won vote will be placed with other candidates in race. If any or all other candidates decided to rank candidate 2 as their preferred candidate and this made candidate 2 who didn't score the highest natural vote to have the highest vote tally. Then candidate 2 would be the winner. This problem of 2nd place winning the seat tends to be in/ at a county state level rather than a national level where the system is in place.This is 1 example but their are other systems i wont detail.

I guess my point of informing you of this is to highlight that every system of voting for candidates to rule us around the world has flaws. You pretty well have to live with the flaws inherent because usually when you try to iron out the percieved flaws you all too often create unintended new flaws.

"Her failure to win the presidency nonetheless due to the geographic distribution of said votes wouldn’t happen in any other country in the world"
We have the electoral college because the Founding Fathers explicitly wanted the geographic vastness of the country to be taken into consideration. (If we were a small, dense country like most of Europe, it would be less relevant.) Without it, the 13 Colonies would never have agreed to become a single country.

Texas alone is larger than any European country (except Russia of course). Rhode Island is larger than 6 European countries.

If, for example, you remove just California, Trump would've won the popular vote by far as well. You can drive from coast to coast without passing through a single county that voted for Hillary. The same is not true the other way around.

Hillary failed to win the electoral vote because she felt cosmically entitled to be the first female president, and was unashamedly condescending and alienating toward middle-America.

"As for your other comments, seems you regard becoming a head of state as a va**na-having person as a noteworthy achievement for Africans and Nikki Haley, but not Democrats."
Leftists assert that America hasn't had a woman president because the country must be seething with misogyny. If that's the case, then why have countries that are objectively far more misogynist had female presidents?...

The Democratic party has failed to run a candidate that could win the election by the rules established in the Constitution. And I'm pointing out the irony that Republicans will now probably get the first female president... and thus strip Democrats of playing the woman card against Republicans.